قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Technology / 2018 iPad vs. 2017 10.5-inch iPad Pro

2018 iPad vs. 2017 10.5-inch iPad Pro



Apple has just released a refreshed 9.7-inch iPad for 2018. The new Slate is Apple's first budget model that supports Apple Pencil and offers a fast A10 Fusion process. Watch this video for how it compares to its larger 10.5-inch iPad Pro sibling.

Apple Pencil support is a huge proposition for users who want to write or draw with Apple's pressure-sensitive pen, but were unwilling to pay more than $ 600 for it – the 10.5-inch iPad Pro for 2017 be exact $ 649.

There are some differences in display technology that can actually make a difference when using the Apple Pencil. The 201

7 iPad Pro features ProMotion, a technology that refreshes the screen at a rate of 120 times per second instead of the normal 60 Hz seen on all other Apple devices. The difference is immediately apparent in slow-motion shots, which show that the iPad Pro's display is much smoother when interacting with Pencil.

When testing the Apple Pencil response time, it takes much longer for notes to appear on the 9.7-inch iPad screen compared to almost instant response on the iPad Pro.

Another big difference is that the iPad Pro's display is completely laminated, giving the impression that the LCD panel is part of the cover glass. It also helps to increase contrast and color reproduction. The budget-priced iPad has a non-laminated display that looks a bit gray compared to the deep blacks the Pro can play.

Even with the cheaper model you can easily see a gap between the display and the glass. If you use Apple Pencil, the gap becomes much more noticeable because you focus on the pen tip. This can lead to accuracy issues, especially when drawing detailed graphics when you are not looking directly at the iPad. On the iPad Pro, however, the gap between Apple Pencil and LCD is almost non-existent, so it feels like you're actually drawing on a piece of paper.

So the Apple Pencil is definitely better on the 10.5 -inch iPad Pro, but is the Pro worth twice the price?

The 2017 iPad Pro Display includes P3 Wide-Color Gamut support, so colors really pop. The screen of the Pro is also much brighter, which is especially helpful when using the device outdoors. In addition, the iPad Pro has an anti-reflective coating that helps to reduce glare. Another great display feature of the Pro is True Tone, which automatically adjusts the white balance of the display to the ambient light.

The new iPad 2018 comes with Apple's A10 Fusion processor, a quad-core processor coming directly from the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus, while the 2017 iPad Pro features the A10X chip, Apple's first six-core mobile processor.

In Geekbench 4, the iPad Pro achieved a 13 percent higher score in a single-core test, something you really can not think about. However, there is a big difference in the multi-core test, with a 57 percent better score for the pro. The iPad Pro has more than doubled the graphics performance of the iPad 2018, resulting in dramatic improvements in rendering and multi-core processes.

In Antutus Benchmark the Pro scored 19 percent more than the low-priced iPad. Similar results were found in the 3DMark Slingshot Extreme benchmark. The iPad Pro scored 20% more than the iPad. We also tested browser performance, and there was not much difference.

In Octane 2.0, the Pro scored only about 10 percent more. In Antutu's HTML5 browser benchmark, there was an even smaller difference, with 6 percent better scores on the pro. This is not surprising, because the iPad 2018 did so well in the single-core test of Geekbench 4 and only one core is used for the browser benchmarks. However, as you start adding more tabs and switching between them, the extra cores of the iPad Pro really make a difference.

Since the iPad Pro ran so well in the graphics test, we decided to play the newly released Fortnite, which is now accessible to all, for an hour on any device. We noticed that the graphics quality on the Pro was higher and the game loaded faster than on the 2018 iPad. The gameplay was very fluid and we did not notice any frame drops. The colors have surfaced more on the pro, and the larger screen size has made the gameplay even more insistent.

On the other hand, it was much more comfortable to play on the iPad 2018, as it is not that wide. We noticed that the screen on the 9.7 inch iPad reflected more, which sometimes was annoying.

After an hour of Fortnite gameplay, the battery of the iPad Pro fell to 80 percent. It dropped to 87 percent on the iPad in 2018, so we can see that the extra horsepower consumes more battery life while performing processor-intensive tasks.

Both iPads weigh about a pound, but the iPad 2018 is actually thicker than the 10.5-inch Pro. For a screen that's almost an inch bigger, it's not much taller thanks to sleek frames all around. The pro camera sticks out a bit, which can be annoying for some. There is also no backward flash on the cheap iPad.

The Pro also has 4 speakers instead of two on the 2018 iPad, and they sound much better. Although the iPad 2018 has stereo speakers, it is located at the bottom of the device and makes the stereo output in landscape mode a non-starter.

The Pro also gets Apple's Smart Connector, which transfers both power and data to a variety of Apple and Logitech accessories

Both phones have a physical Home button with Touch ID, although the Pro Apple's second-generation technology Apple gets. We tested the Touch ID speed and released the Pro system much faster and more reliably than the budget-priced iPad, which often can not be unlocked if you do not keep your finger on the sensor.

Even with the cameras, there are big differences. The Pro gets a 12MP sensor that can record 4K video. The iPad 2018 gets only 8MP and can record up to 1080p. Photos are more detailed and the colors look better on the Pro. Also, the video on the iPad Pro looks much more detailed than on the low-end iPad.

An even greater disparity can be seen in the FaceTime camera, with 7MP on the Pro in 1080p video and a rather poor 1.2MP on the iPad with up to 720P recording.

.


Source link