قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Sports / 2018 Stanley Cup Final – Why Game 1 between Vegas Golden Knights and Washington Capitals was peak hockey

2018 Stanley Cup Final – Why Game 1 between Vegas Golden Knights and Washington Capitals was peak hockey

Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Final between the Vegas Golden Knights and Washington Capitals was Peak Hockey, the epitome of what the NHL version of the sport can do Whether it is played at its most kinetisch Tempo and with its most dramatic undercurrents.

It was the kind of game that made illogical apathy to sport, like meeting someone who does not appreciate oxygen, for example. The kind of game that could make a non-believer dedicate his life to hockey. If the NHL were a television series, that would be the episode you show your friends to make them watch the rest.

Game 1

was top-of-the-line, because by the time the horn came out at Vegas' 6-4, they felt pretty exhausted. The flow was unbelievable and unyielding: the Capitals and Knights combined 135 shot attempts in the game. Even unsuccessful sequences were intoxicating, as defensive cover melted and players whirled around trying to make a game.

The Hockey Commentary was breathless:

With all the attention that has been put on impenetrable goalkeeping equipment over the years, the offensive flow does not only provide thrills in all the debates about the size of the network for the thrill of achieving it.

Although goals obviously help.

Ryan Reaves, No. 75, does not go down in history as one of the game's biggest scorers. But his count to tie Game 1 at 4-4 turned out to be a crucial moment. Ethan Miller / Getty Images

Game 1 was top hockey as the capitals and knights combined for 10 of them, the first time in eight seasons the first game of taillight produced many such results. These goals were Vegas, they were a figurative all-you-can-eat buffet: a few dislocations, a power-play tally, some pointy shots, some goals set on the pre-fight and hurry, players' goals Who had 43 of them in the regular season like William Karlsson and scored goals from players who had 31 of them in their eight-year career before this playoff run, like Ryan Reaves.

Game 1 was Peak Hockey because it accentuates one of the realities of modern NHL: that all four lines must help. Fifteen years ago, a player with far less skill than Reaves would have roamed the fourth row for a team like Vegas by going six minutes per game while waiting for someone. But in Game 1, Reaves and linemate Tomas Nosek scored the last three goals to tip the balance to Vegas.

"I like where I am," Reaves said. "I like my linemates, I'm not a firstliner, I've always been a scorer, only in the fourth row."

2 Related

Game 1 was top hockey, because despite these 10 goals, the goalkeepers … were actually good. Neither Marc-Andre Fleury (24 caps) nor Braden Holtby (28 caps) can be considered as a burden, although the game in the second round has reached the "preponderance" of sports betting. Seeing a goalie duel in a 10-goal game is like watching an Oscar-worthy performance in a Michael Bay movie in which it is completely drowned out by cacophony. But it happened between Fleury and Holtby, despite a pair of under 900 percentages. [1] Game 1 was top hockey because, despite the best effort of these goalies, no lead was safe. In fact, it was the first game in Stanley Cup Final history, the four leadership changes, according to the Elias Sports Bureau. For the impatient fan, the momentum was: The first goal of the game was at 7:15 clock in the first half, and any change in the lead after that was at least 7:15 after the opponent's last goal. In top hockey, no lead is safe. In Game 1, every lead felt temporary, until the delirious last three minutes, when the capitals put pressure on Holtby.

Game 1 was top hockey because mistakes were made. Peak hockey can never be a well-played chess game or direct goalkeeper championship, although both genres have their merits. Peak hockey needs pucks that bounce around on a roulette wheel with the unpredictability of a ball, resulting in 10 goals in a game. (Admittedly, top hockey probably needs better ice than in Game 1, but that's hockey in the middle of the desert in late May.) The fact that both teams hated their performances in an incredibly entertaining game speaks volumes about how a lack is mechanical precision leads to chaotic fun.

Game 1 was top hockey because the referees contributed to the better and sometimes worse to this mess. There were four minor penalties listed in Game 1, resulting in two power games and two minutes of 4-on-4 action. While the ideal could be at least two power-play opportunities per team, the absence of special teams made 5-on-5 action blossom. But it was also peak hockey because, frankly, you need something to get nervous about becoming an amateur. The missed countercheck on John Carlson, who, for example, set the goal of Reaves.

"Definitely one could have been called after the first punishment they called in the game, which is quite similar and leads directly to a goal." When comparing apples to apples, I think you're even worse "Capitals defender Matt Niskanen said."

And, as another example, the big punishment that Tom Wilson would have had to demand for this hit over Jonathan Marchessault

Game 1 was top hockey for as much as we pray can thrive the altar of the offensive and as much as we mourn cheap shots and hurting frontier games, top hockey needs the bit of controversy that a blow like Wilson can produce – not something that overshadows the game … though Admittedly, everything that concerns Wilson these days comes close. But something that adds a vulgar sidebar to the main story, as we see the attacked – "He hits me on the blind side, it's a bit late, the league will take care of it," Marchessault said – and the attacker – – "I think so 'It was a good, clean shot, it's playoff hockey, there will be hits,' said Wilson – Rashomon effect after-game traffic.

Capitals winger Tom Wilson found himself in another controversy for a borderline hit, this time against Jonathan Marchessault of Golden Knights. Bruce Bennett / Getty Images

Game 1 was top hockey because the emotions stirred in the crowd on the Wilson Dash were about one-hundredth of its total emotional output for the game. Peak hockey needs atmosphere, and few Stanley Cup final games lately had the volume of Vegas crowd that was 15 minutes from the puck without a player on the ice in a towel-waving frenzy . No Stanley Cup finals in recent history have had the cheesy glory of the Golden Knights, announcing the lineups and trebuchets and false sword fights with Michael Buffer, and [checks notes] a first 74th birthday celebration for Motown legend Gladys Knight

Stanley Cup Playoffs Central »
Expert selection | Schedule »

Conference Final Conference:

Semi-final conference results:

Round 1 Results:

Peak Hockey accomplishes the impossible that transmits the unparalleled energy within the arena through the television to viewers worldwide. What, as anyone who knows hockey knows, is not always easy. But there is a proven way to break the fourth wall while watching the game:

Game 1 was top hockey because top hockey needed a job.

It's why an Olympic medal game or a game 7 captivates. and it was one reason why Game 1 was such an incredible ride. Two teams that have played each other twice in their history are now locked in a series of ridiculous tempo that increase physicality and tangible spectacle.

The Expansion Vegas Golden Knights are now three wins from the Stanley Cup. Alex Ovechkin and the captains are three defeats away as they finish their journey just before the Cup, this time closer than ever to Ovechkin's career. This was not the game # 24 in late November. This was the last phase of the video game where both teams tried to reach the killing screen.

"It's going to be a long series, it's going to be a tough series," said Ovechkin.

And we & # 39; Everybody can see if the almost perfect mix of kinetics, whimsy and controversy of Game 1 was the tantalizing preview for an epic series or if we all saw the top hockey of this year's final.

Source link