Many experts said WHO should accept what some have termed the “precautionary principle” and others “needs and values” – the idea that the agency will accept the worst of the virus, use common sense and the best, without definitive evidence Protection should recommend possible.
“There is no undeniable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted or significantly transmitted by aerosols, but there is absolutely no evidence that this is not the case,” said Dr. Trish Greenhalgh, general practitioner at Oxford University in the UK.
“Right now, given the uncertainty, we have to make a decision, and gosh, if we do something wrong, it will be a disastrous decision,”
After all, WHO appears to be ready, the idea that the virus could be transmitted from surfaces without accepting much evidence, she and other researchers found, even though other health officials have resigned and stressed this path.
“I agree that the transmission of Fomite for this virus is not directly detected,” said Dr. Allegranzi, WHO’s technical director of infection control, referred to objects that may be infectious. “However, it is known that other coronaviruses and respiratory viruses are transmitted and have been shown to be transmitted through contact with Fomite.”
The agency must also take into account the needs of all of its member states, including those with limited resources, and ensure that its recommendations are mitigated by “availability, feasibility, compliance, resource impact,” she said.
[[[[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.]]
Aerosols could play a limited role in the spread of the virus, Dr. Paul Hunter, member of the Infection Prevention Committee and professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia in the UK.