قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / 5 battles after the publication of the Mueller Report

5 battles after the publication of the Mueller Report



This release will be a big deal – our first real glimpse of what the Russians were up to in 2016, how much (or little) the Trump campaign was playing, and whether President Donald Trump (or anyone in) was his circle ) made efforts to get in the way of the probe.

This is undoubtedly and an end. But do not fool yourself: this is not the end . No matter what the Müller report says – or how much of it we will actually see after the editors – it will continue to be a source of massive clashes in our culture, with tentacles not only in the political world (up and down the Pennsylvania Avenue), but also into the legal range.

* The Red Action Fight : In a statement to a House Committee last week, Barr made it clear that he did not intend to submit the full, unadjusted report to Congress. (He said he would be willing to talk to the chairmen of the Senate and the House Judiciary Committee about what is not included in the revised version.) Barr also said that there were four categories of edited information: 1
) Grand Jury Material 2) Information 3) Information about ongoing tests and 4) Information that could harm "external third parties" in the investigation. The Democrats have already made it clear that they want to see the full report, and have already approved a summons in case Barr does not approve.
* The Obstruction Fight : We know from the Barr Supreme Letter that "evidence" exists on both sides of the debate as to whether Trump or anyone associated with him intended to conduct the Mueller investigation into Russia's interference to obstruct on purpose. And the letter from Barr also quotes Mueller, who says: "Although this report does not conclude that the president has committed a crime, he does not relieve him." Barr decided not to prosecute Trump for disability, and Mueller made no recommendation, as Barr said last week before the congress. why did he do that? And why did not Müller make a recommendation for obstacles? Another: What evidence do we speak on both sides of the obstacle question?

* The Rebuttal Fight : Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani has been promising for months that the White House will present its own report as a way to answer what Müller has put together. Giuliani told CNN's Dana Bash on Sunday evening that the White House is still awaiting the publication of a refutation report and that it will be released after the Mueller report is released. Is there even "there" in this refutation report? Or is it simply Trump's tweets with a few legal contributions thrown in there? Does it matter in the broader debate on the Müller report? Or is it simply dismissed as a garbage chute and forgotten within a day or two?

* The Russia Fight : If "no collusion" had taken place between the Trump campaign and the Russians, Barr's summary of Mueller's report made it clear – why the hell were so many Trump employees in the 2016 elections? Russians in contact? (According to CNN reports, at least 16 Trump employees had contacts with Russians during the campaign or transition.) And why did so many of them (Michael Flynn) lie or remember (Jeff Sessions) about the depth and breadth of their interactions with Russians? Was that just the biggest coincidence in the world? This central issue is likely to be torn up and down Capitol Hill as Democrats seek to back Muller's expected agreement in search of answers.

* The Steele Dossier Fight : The Opposition The research document compiled in many ways by former British spy Christopher Steele is at the center of the controversy between the two parties over the entire investigation. The Democrats consider Steele the most important thing regarding Trump and find that former FBI director James Comey said under oath that the Justice Department could independently validate parts of the Steele dossier. On the other hand, the Republicans consider the Steele dossier to be a partisan funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee. They insist that the dossier is the reason that the FBI has launched an investigation into counterintelligence, which led primarily to the Müller Special Prosecutor. And that's a problem, because many Republicans think that many of the allegations of the dossier are untrue. This disagreement has nothing to do with it because it is too strong for both sides to let go.


Source link