قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / A Guide to the Investigation of Scott Pruitt, E.P.A. boss

A Guide to the Investigation of Scott Pruitt, E.P.A. boss



calls on Scott Pruitt, the chief of the Environmental Protection Agency, to step down the escalation on Wednesday, when nearly 170 Congressional Democrats demanded his departure.

A resolution sponsored by Senator Tom Udall of New Mexico and Representative Kathy Castor of Florida The resignation of Mr. Pruitt attracted 39 co-sponsors of the Senate. According to Kara Baer, ​​an editor of the Senate Library, it was the largest number of senators ever to call for a resolution demanding the dismissal of a cabinet official.

The resolution will probably go nowhere without republican support that it lacks. However, he underlines the pressure that Mr. Pruitt has already experienced through nine investigations ̵

1; from the Congress, the White House and his own agency – whether he has misused taxpayers' money or violated other legal standards.

This week, the Government Accountability Office, often referred to as the Watchdog Arm of the Congress, has determined that E.P.A. broke the law when it spent $ 43,000 on a secure phone booth for Mr. Pruitt. And on Wednesday the director of the White House Management and Budget Office told Congress that he also wanted to examine Mr. Pruitt's spending habits.

Jahan Wilcox, an EPA spokesman, said in a statement Mr. Pruitt remained focused on his job. "Administrator Pruitt is focused on driving President Trump's regulatory safety and environmental agenda," he said.

Here's a guide to the investigations:

Meeting with the industry

The E.P.A. Inspector General has also commenced an investigation into a meeting that Mr. Pruitt held with the National Mining Association.

Office Upgrades

The G.A.O. has already decided that the purchase of a secure phone booth by Mr. Pruitt has broken the law.

In particular, the examiners found that the E.P.A. was required to inform Congress about purchases of more than $ 5,000 for office construction and that the agency also violated the Antideficiency Act, which aims to prevent unborn spending.

But the investigations are not finished yet. Democrats in the House and Senate have asked Mr. Pruitt to respond to allegations by Kevin Chmielewski, the former E.P.A. Deputy Chief of Staff that the Administrator also exceeded the spending limit on art loaned by the Smithsonian Institution and the framing of an American flag

Salary increases for AIDS

On Monday, the E.P.A. Inspector General stated what is likely to be the first part of an ongoing investigation into the use of a clean drinking water provision to hire former lobbyists and increase political aides.

Initial documents released this week show that Pruitt's chief of staff, Ryan Jackson, had signed substantial salary increases for two consultants who had previously worked for Mr. Pruitt in Oklahoma. Two Democratic senators have the G.A.O. Also to investigate the surveys, although this investigation is pending the full outcome of the Inspector General's report, aides said

Scientific Advisory Councils

The questions surrounding Mr. Pruit's travel and spending decisions include an investigation on a very different topic: his selection process for members of a Scientific Advisory Board.

More specifically, the G.A.O. It accepted a request from two Democratic senators to deal with the dismissal of panelists who advise on health and scientific affairs. The G.A.O. said that it will look into the role, the political appointee at the E.P.A. Emagazine.credit-suisse.com/app/art … = 157 & lang = DE When selecting a new list of advisers, it was more likely to be guided by industry and government regulators than university researchers. Englisch: emagazine.credit-suisse.com/app/art … = 263 & lang = en.

Undisclosed Email Addresses

In recent days, a watchdog group warned lawmakers that Mr. Pruitt had two secret email addresses other than two known.

Democrats have a

Separately, Senator John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, has berated Mr. Pruitt and asked him to declare his email usage. by the Inspector General, although one was not opened. "During your confirmation hearing, I specifically requested you not to take any action that would make it more difficult for the public or prevent you from accessing your formal written communications under the Freedom of Information Act," Mr. Barrasso wrote to the Administrator.


Source link