قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Alaska man can use hovercraft during moose hunting, Supreme Court says

Alaska man can use hovercraft during moose hunting, Supreme Court says



On Tuesday, the judge in the US Supreme Court is said to have unanimously opted for an Alaskan moose hunter who overruled the jurisdiction of lower courts in his fight with the National Park Service (NPS).

"We return the decision down and desire [John] Sturgeon good hunting," said Justice Elena Kagan when she read a summary of the decision.

The Supreme Court ruling came from a 2007 incident when Sturgeon from Anchorage, Alaska, used a hovercraft The Associated Press reported hunting elks along the Nation River that runs along the Yukon-Charley River National River.

However, Sturgeon was reportedly informed by several Park Service Rangers at the time that the use of the hovercraft was unlawful. The agency had banned hovercraft in other states.

Supreme Court Warlike Conscience of the Partisan GERRYMANDERING

In collaboration with Sturgeon, the Supreme Court stated that the Authority had unjustly prohibited the use of an amphibious vehicle through a National Wildlife Sanctuary.

In its ruling, Justices cited the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, which provided 1

62,500 square kilometers of land for conservation purposes in 1980. The law has reportedly created 10 new national parks, nature reserves and monuments, but the Agency's rules would not apply to state or private land within non-federal protected areas.

"Sturgeon can bring his hovercraft back to the moose." Kagan wrote.

Sturgeon filed suit with Park Service Rangers about four years after the incident, even though his fight was denied to the lower courts The Associated Press.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Supreme Court reportedly had an impact on the matter in 2016, pointing out that the 1980 Act had several country-specific exceptions 9) Court of Appeal for reconsideration

Finally, this court ruled that the NPS had the regulatory authority of a river in a protected area. The Supreme Court judges rejected this conclusion.

The Associated Press contributed to this report i.


Source link