We all knew that Amazon would not stand to lose the common defense infrastructure contract. Now – just weeks after the government awarded the $ 10 billion project to Microsoft – the company took the first step to defend itself against what it saw in the Pentagon's decision-making process as " unmistakably ".
The technology giant has filed a protest with the US Court of Federal Claims, citing its plans to question the outcome which was published in . Andy Jassy, CEO of Amazon Web Services, announced the news for the first time at a corporate meeting on Thursday that was held by Federal Times and the company later confirmed that it had filed documentation last week.
"Numerous aspects of the JEDI evaluation process contained clear deficiencies, errors, and unambiguous distortions, and it is important that these issues be investigated and corrected," an AWS spokesman told Gizmodo.
I usually take a salt-spit PR game, but in that case, that statement pretty much sums up the matter. The JEDI contract aims to bring the cloud computing infrastructure to the Department of Defense, and Amazon has remained a clear leader for most of its years (especially in comparison to competitors such as the United States) due to its experience and its significant market share Microsoft, Google) and Oracle). Several competitors even argued that the contract was apparently tailored to the company.
Amazon, however, is also run by Jeff Bezos, a man our president really does not like . Probably because he's the owner of the Washington Post, which has barely reported on this government so far, but frankly, it has never cost much to anger Donald Trumps (usually heavily taunted).
The Federal Act on Takeovers prevents politicians from outsmarting Libra With such contracts, Trump and other government officials have decided against Amazon securing the project. Last summer, the president retweeted a link to a Fox News segment calling the JEDI contract Bezos Bailout. In a recent book, a speech writer from former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, Guy Snodgrass, claimed Trump was trying to convince Mattis to "screw" Amazon out of business.
AWS seems to mention this controversy directly in its statement: "We also believe that it is crucial for our country that the government and its elected leaders manage procurement objectively and in a manner that is free of political influence . "
In July competitor Oracle also alleged that a" conspiracy "(1
In this case, Amazon has to make a formal protest in a federal court, in which its arguments for the impartiality of the Pentagon are further elaborated.