قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / "An Existential Threat": Desperate efforts to start debates shatter Dem campaigns

"An Existential Threat": Desperate efforts to start debates shatter Dem campaigns







  Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand "(19659002) Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand is one of six Democratic presidential candidates who have met the eligibility criteria for debate through their polls but not their donors." Scott Olson / Getty Images </p>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<div class=

2020 Elections [19659004] Presidential campaigns use unusual tactics to qualify for the Democratic phase thanks to the new donor threshold.

The unconventional, often crappy arms race is part of the desperate struggle to cross a new threshold set by the Democratic National Committee (65,000 individual lenders) for the first primary debates in June and July. The debates on television could be make-or-break showcases for the presidential candidates of 2020, and the call has reshaped the strategy of the candidates who have endeavored to transcend the donor brand, change the priorities of the spending and the path of their campaigns to change.

Story To Be Continued

As important as the debates are, several presidential campaigns have decided to give Facebook advertising priority over hiring employees in early states, several campaigners said. Others noted that the rules of hunting for viral moments at the beginning of the campaign give precedence over the construction of traditional voting infrastructures in Iowa and New Hampshire. Proponents of the new rules, however, say they only forced campaigns to compete before the election year in the 21st century.

"The times of pure funding [a campaign] in Iowa and New Hampshire are over, especially in a 22-person area," said former DNC chairman Howard Dean, whose presidential campaign in 2004 was a pioneer in the online Fundraising for small dollars was. "I would say the candidates who have not crossed the threshold, get to work."

John Davis, a senior adviser to Delaney's campaign, said when the DNC requirements were released, "we have adjusted our plan."

"They start with the goal of winning Iowa, who won New Hampshire, but now we have to do that first, "Davis continued. "We always wanted to invest in a small dollar program but did not have a timetable."

"It will encourage candidates to focus on fundraising instead of hiring staff and traveling to key primary states," said New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, who ran in 2008 for the nomination of Democratic presidential nominees the rules of the DNC "disturbing". "This is clear for those candidates who have announced early or for candidates who have had fundraising bases."

Candidates You can also qualify for the debates by getting at least 1 percent in three approved surveys. However, campaigns also aim to reach the donor threshold because the DNC has limited the number of participants to 20. If more than these candidates meet the eligibility or donor criteria, the committee will prioritize the presidential candidates who have met. And there is a constant concern that the DNC will continue to improve the criteria for future debates that are not yet announced.

Six Candidates – Gillibrand, Delaney, Inslee, the former Governor of Colorado, John Hickenlooper and the Reps. Tim Ryan and Eric Swalwell – have met the eligibility criteria for the debate through their polls, but not through their donors. Senator Cory Booker and Julian Castro have each received 65,000 donors in recent days, a Victory Booker that FaceTiming personally celebrated with its 65,000th donor, a weapons reform activist from Minnesota.

"We stick to strategic decisions because it's about what the thresholds will look like [to qualify for] – debates three and four," said a presidential campaign helper granting anonymity to discuss the internal campaign strategy. "These rules are an incentive to be viral, to become national rather than to build an infrastructure in the states that can actually win a court decision."

Another presidential campaign leader called the requirement "an existential threat," especially in the face of concern that the DNC could accept the requirements and qualify them for future debates in 2019. The donor criteria can be "up to 90,000 or 120,000," the consultant said. "That's why it's so important to reach 65,000 even for those who have crossed the electoral threshold."

And several presidential campaigns are asking about the long-term effects of the rules, especially if they are prepared for the future. Debates could lead to a tense relationship with lenders who are not yet ready to commit to a candidate.

"These demands on small investors are a source of stress and I'm not sure this is the right way to connect with voters," said Jennifer Fiore, Senior Advisor to Castro's campaign. "Ultimately, the donors control whether the ideas of a candidate or a community are represented. If we do that for next year, it will be very stressful for voters and campaigns.

From the outside there is less sympathy for these positions.

"Support for social media and grassroots has become a metric that judges modern candidates, and they may not like it, but it is the new reality," said Patti Solis Doyle, a Democratic strategist who led the 2008 election Presidential campaign led by Hillary Clinton. "The game has changed, and you're either working inside the new system or need to get out."

However, there is also a clear intention to "avoid [repeating] what happened to the Republicans in 2016", a two-tiered system with debates "varsity" and "junior varsity," said the CEO by DNC, Tom McMahon's director during the presidential cycle of 2008, "when Trump mastered everything."

"So how do you set a fair criterion?" added McMahon. "It's not easy."

"The DNC led one Fundraising threshold at grassroots level to ensure that candidates in this historically large field have a fair opportunity to reach the debating stage, and because this reflects the work that is crucial to a successful parliamentary election campaign, "said Adrienne Watson, one Spokeswoman for the DNC, in a statement sent to POLITICO

The rules have also opened the process for unconventional candidates – at least for those who are online Feu he can catch. Andrew Yang, a businessman who works on a universal basic income platform and weighed against circumcision, has already met both criteria for the debate.

For candidates, the explicit challenge seems to be the best strategy. No one has used it more effectively than the mayor of South Bend, Pete Buttigieg, who cut a Twitter video shortly after his CNN Town Hall, urging fans to "wrap anything they want" to "put him in the Debate phase "bring more than $ 600,000 over the next 24 hours. Since then Buttigieg has promised followers that he will "respect your inbox" and will not send e-mails claiming "$ 3 or breaking hell by midnight," he said on Sunday in a South Carolina campaign.

unable to complete this unique viral moment, continues to appeal for $ 1 support. Booker joined Twitter this week to request 2,000 more posts before reaching his 65,000-donor goal. MEP Tulsi Gabbard from Hawaii sent an e-mail with the subject: "We are in danger of losing our place" – even though she qualified twice for the stage.

Even former Vice President Joe Biden, who leads the first election runs and incites over 65,000 donors on his first day of racing, still poses small dollar questions.

"Can you send $ 1?", Biden's campaign wrote a recent fundraising email.


Source link