قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Health / Anti-soft drink measures are missing

Anti-soft drink measures are missing



It's no secret that carbonated sodas and supposedly healthy fruit juice drinks give those who consume them a sugar-sweet two-two punch – especially adolescents in their teens.

They are the main reason for the skyrocketing incidence of childhood obesity, heart disease and diabetes in this country.

At least as never before, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association have made a number of recommendations to reverse this disturbing trend. They include raising excise duty prices for sugary drinks, with revenues "partly aimed at reducing health and socio-economic disparities" – whatever that means.

In accordance with the proposals of the Academy of Pediatrics / Heart Association, they have produced two bills aimed at the consumption of sugary drinks by children.

According to State House News Service, Sen. Jason Lewis, Rep. Kay Khan and Hon. Jon Santiago have passed a law that would levy excise duty on sugary drinks, with the tax increasing with sugar content.

Among the bills (S 1

709, H 2529) are drinks containing 7.5 grams of sugar or Sugar would contain less per 12 fl oz, but those with 30 grams of sugar or more per 12 fl oz would be taxed at 2 cents per ounce, and drinks between these two sugar levels would be taxed at 1 cent per ounce.

Man estimates that these legislative moves will bring somewhere between $ 280 and $ 320 million a year.

The same three laws Suppliers have also submitted invoices (S 1291, H 1947) aimed at reducing adolescent access and exposure to sugary drinks. They would prohibit the marketing of sugary drinks at school and demand that sugary drinks be labeled with a warning that it is more common for obesity, diabetes and tooth decay associated with their consumption.

In each children's restaurant of a restaurant, water, sparkling water, flavored water, 100% juice without the addition of sweeteners or milk can be used. Customers could still request an alternative drink.

While it is good-natured for parents to take the path of least resistance or for their sugar-coated children to pay more for this extra glucose, this can bring millions, but this has a disproportionate impact on some of the population least afford.

This is because the list of poor and low-income Massachusetts families receiving cash benefits from the Department of Transitional Assistance can not use this EBT card because it covers everything from alcoholic drinks to recreational marijuana. but no sugar-saturated soft drinks.

Until the inclusion of soft drinks in this list, this legislation will not only help the financially and physically most vulnerable among us, but could actually worsen their condition.

The active approach contained in the other bills – prohibiting the marketing of sugary drinks in our public schools and requiring them to bear a health warning sign – would make the field of "socio-economic disparity" a campaign with just one message for make everyone competitive.

This is because sugar does not discriminate. its adverse effects pose a health risk to equal opportunities.


Source link