Home / US / AOC warns Trump-Biden Democrats about lifestyle change: “There’s no going back to brunch”

AOC warns Trump-Biden Democrats about lifestyle change: “There’s no going back to brunch”



MEP Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has prepared her supporters for a very different future than expected – even if presidential candidate Joe Biden and other Democrats prevail in November.

“There’s no going back to brunch,” the New York Democrat warned in an online post.

The progressive congresswoman confirmed that Republicans are determined to occupy the seat of the Supreme Court of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a conservative election, and told her 8 million Twitter followers that democracy itself is at stake in the upcoming election.

“Our democracy is in a weak heartbeat; it was broken before Trump. But as long as we can save lives, I believe we have an obligation to do so if we are building a new world, ”she signed her Twitter video.

AOC SAYS GINSBURG̵

7;S DEATH SHOULD ‘RADICALIZE’ THIS: ‘I need you to be ready’

“And after we’ve worked to get the win in November, people need to realize there is no going back to brunch,” she added, which means progressives can’t get complacent even if they win.

Ocasio-Cortez, who replaced Senator Bernie Sanders during his presidential candidacy and was visibly lukewarm at Joe Biden’s candidacy, feverishly went on her social media accounts after Ginsburg’s death from cancer on Friday to summon progressives that it was up this choice is about survival. ”

LINCOLN PROJECT CONDEMNS HARMFUL POSSIBLE SCOTUS NOMINATION BY TRUMPF

“Voting for Joe Biden is not about whether you agree with him,” she said into the camera. “It’s a vote to let our democracy live another day.”

While Sanders built a progressive youth movement during his runs in 2016 and 2020, Biden struggled to get younger voters excited about his more moderate politics.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Congresswoman told reporters on Saturday that if Republicans manage to enforce conservative justice and Biden wins, “we should leave all options on the table, including the number of Supreme Court justices.”


Source link