A federal appeals court rejected an offer by former US intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning on Monday for dismissing him from a jail for failing to testify before a grand jury investigating Wikileaks.
The Tripartite Judge's Unanimous Decision The United States Constitutional Court's panel in Richmond rejects both of Manning's arguments that she had been falsely tried in civil contempt and her claim for bail while the referral decision is in court.
Manning has since been detained at Alexandria Detention Center on March 8, after refusing to testify before the Wikileaks Grand Jury.
Since their detention, charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange have been lifted and US officials have requested his extradition. Manning's lawyers argued that their testimony was partly unnecessary because Assange had already been charged.
Manning spent seven years in a military prison for delivering military and diplomatic documents to Wikileaks before then-President Barack Obama evicted the rest of her 35 years in prison.
Manning's attorneys also claimed that she told the authorities everything she knew during her judicial war investigation, and that her detention was unnecessarily cruel because the prison can not provide adequate medical care in connection with mating the male gender
The prosecution responded that it was of the opinion that Manning, who had been granted immunity for her testimony before the grand jury, could say more about her interactions with Wikileaks than previously announced, and that Manning was not included in the Able to disturb the grand jury. She simply goes into her speculation that she will be eliminated for harassment. They also say that the prison has done everything to satisfy their medical needs.
The prosecution has named Manning's leak at Wikileaks as one of the biggest compromises in classified information in US history.
Monday's statement was issued by judges Allyson Duncan, a candidate appointed by George W. Bush; Paul Niemayer, a George H.W. Bush appointed; and Robert King, an employee of Bill Clinton.
Manning said in a statement made by her legal team that she was considering an appeal to either the entire Fourth Circle or the Supreme Court.
"I have nothing to contribute to this or any other big jury," she said. "While I miss home, they can continue to hold me in jail, with all the damaging consequences this brings, and I will not give up."
Her attorney Moira Meltzer-Cohen said she does not believe that Manning's testimony is necessary to the grand jury.
"The probable purpose of their subpoena is to help the prosecutor undermine a possible testimony as a defense for a pending Assange lawsuit," she said.
Under the conditions of the judge's contempt for disrespect, Manning remains detained until she agrees to testify or until the grand jury term is completed. This date is unknown.