قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Business / Apple received a legal strike when Qualcomm was awarded $ 31 million by the jury

Apple received a legal strike when Qualcomm was awarded $ 31 million by the jury



  Qualcomm Headquarters-3

Apple and Qualcomm are in a heated lawsuit.


James Martin / CNET

Apple has violated three Qualcomm patents and should pay $ 31 million to the chipmaker for violating its technology, a jury on Thursday said that will give Qualcomm a boost as it enters another litigation with the iPhone next month. Manufacturer device.

Qualcomm filed In July 2017, Apple had used its technology in some versions of its popular iPhone without permission. The jury awarded Qualcomm the full amount requested at the beginning of the two-week trial in San Diego .

A controversial Qualcomm patent relates to a technology that allows a smartphone to quickly connect to the Internet as soon as the device is turned on. Another is concerned with graphics processing and battery life. The third technology deals with a technology that shifts the traffic between the app processor and the modem of a phone.

$ 31 million in losses is a decline for Apple, which has shrunk to $ 1 trillion last year. However, it is an important win for Qualcomm, which is recognizing its reputation as a mobile component innovator. The win also adds credibility to the view that the company's innovations are reflected in the iPhones.

The ruling sets the stage for a highly anticipated process between the two companies, scheduled for next month in San Diego. The quarrel over Qualcomm's patent licenses with Apple is billions of dollars and will be a crescendo in the far-reaching legal history of tech giants.

The conflict between Apple and Qualcomm began two years ago when the Federal Trade Commission accused Qualcomm, with the support of Apple and Intel, of being a monopoly in fashion chips. The FTC argued that Qualcomm's royalties prevented competitors from entering the market and that telephone prices rose. The trial took place in January and the parties are currently awaiting a decision.

The study next month will also review Qualcomm's licensing business.

Thursday's patent proceeding, chaired by US District Judge Dana Sabraw, is more technical and less prominent than the other parts of the litigation. Nevertheless, this could affect how your phone is made and how much it costs.

The General Counsel of Qualcomm, Don Rosenberg, praised the decision.

"Today's unanimous jury verdict is the latest victory in our worldwide patent litigation, which blames Apple for using our valuable technology without paying for it," said Rosenberg. "The technologies developed by Qualcomm and others have allowed Apple to enter the market and be so successful so quickly."

Apple said the verdict was "disappointed".

"Qualcomm's continued campaign against patent infringement claims is nothing more than an attempt to deviate from the major problems that they have faced in investigating their business practices in federal courts and around the world," a spokesperson said.

The two sides spent much of the process to fight the boot-up patent. Apple argued that one of his engineers, Arjuna Siva, made important contributions to technology and should be mentioned in the patent. Apple said Qualcomm stole the idea when the two companies worked together to launch Qualcomm's chips into iPhones. The process took a notable turn last week when Siva, who now works for Google, apparently resigned then revoked the decision at on Monday .

The jury suppressed Apple's argument that Siva should have been named as the inventor.

Apple argued that the trial was not just patents. During closing arguments on Wednesday Apple lawyer Juanita Brooks said the "true motivation" for the lawsuit was a retaliation for Apple, which launched Intel as the second chip maker in 2016. She said Qualcomm was upset because the two companies had previously had an exclusive relationship since 2011.

Now, Intel has completely replaced Qualcomm on iPhones.

"Qualcomm went into a drawer, dusted off some old patents, and threw them against the wall to see if they would stick." Brooks said. Qualcomm lawyer David Nelson said, "We have the right to get back our intellectual property."


Source link