قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Author of Ohio abortion bill believes court will welcome it 'with open arms'

Author of Ohio abortion bill believes court will welcome it 'with open arms'



A bill that would ban abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected what approved this week by the Ohio Senate, the first step in what the bill's author says is the controversial legislation. Supreme Court "with open arms."

But many legal experts and women's groups say the bill has no chance of surviving in the nation's highest court – even with the president of Donald Trump's conservative nominations have ushered in.

Ohio's so-called heartbeat bill would ban abortions from the moment a heartbeat is detected in a fetus, which can be as early as six weeks into a pregnancy – before some women even they are pregnant. [19659002] Its author, president and founder of pro-life network Faith 2 Action Janet Porter first introduced the bill in Ohio in 2011 and has described it in the past years as the "arrow in the heart of Roe v. Wade," The 1973 case that legalized abortion nationwide.

"The bill itself is one that the Supreme Court is ready for," Porter told NBC News on Friday.

The Ohio House and Senate made similar statements in 2016 but what veto ed by Republican Gov. John Kasich.

"My hope is that Gov. Kasich returns to his pro-life roots and keeps beating hearts," she said.

The heartbeat bill is one of two abortion restrictions that Republican Ohio lawmakers have sent to Kasich. The other bill bans dilations and evacuation abortions,

Kasich has indicated he will veto the heartbeat bill. Even if he does not, many say the odds of the Supreme Court,

Related: Protests for and against abortion in America

19659011] 19 PHOTOS

Protests for and against abortion in America

See Gallery

An anti-abortion protester with tape over her mouth demonstrates the US June 27, 2016.

(REUTERS / Kevin Lamarque)

Demonstrator hold signs outside the US The Supreme Court as the court is due to issue its first major abortion ruling since 2007 against a background of unremitting divisions among Americans on the issue and a long-term decline in the rate at which women terminate pregnancies in Washington, U.S.. June 27, 2016.

(REUTERS / Kevin Lamarque)

Demonstrator hold signs outside the U.S. The Supreme Court as the court is due to issue its first major abortion ruling since 2007 against a background of unremitting divisions among Americans on the issue and a long-term decline in the rate at which women terminate pregnancies in Washington, U.S.. June 27, 2016.

(REUTERS / Kevin Lamarque)

Protesters demonstrate in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on the grounds that the procedure was carried out in Washington, March 2, 2016. [19659016] (REUTERS / Kevin Lamarque)

Anti-Trump demonstrator protests at abortion rights rally in Chicago, Illinois, January 15, 2017.

(REUTERS / Kamil Krzaczynski)

Pro-choice activists celebrate on the steps of the United States Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 in Washington, DC. In a 5-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down one of the nation's toughest restrictions on abortion, a Texas law group said it would close more than three quarters of the state's clinics to close.

[Photo by Pete Marovich / Getty Images]

Pro-life activists gather outside the Supreme Court for the March National Rally in Washington, DC, US January 27, 2017.

(REUTERS / Aaron P. Bernstein)

Pro-life activists gather for the National March for Life Rally in Washington January 27, 2017.

(REUTERS / Aaron P. Bernstein)

19659031] Pro-Choice supporters of Planned Parenthood rally outside a Planned Parenthood clinic in Detroit, Michigan, US February 11, 2017.

(REUTERS / Rebecca Cook)

A man holds up a rosary in front of competing demonstrators displaying pro-life and pro-choice signs as the annual March for Life concludes at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC. January 27, 2017.

(REUTERS / James Lawler Duggan)

Siberian Husky Tasha Wears a "Huskies for Choice" sign by Her Pro-Abortion Owner Michelle Kinsey Bruns in front of the Supreme Court during the National March for rally life in Washington January 22, 2016. The rally marks the 43rd anniversary of the US Supreme Court's 1973 abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade.

(REUTERS / Gary Cameron)

A man stands during an anti-Planned Parenthood vigil outside the Planned Parenthood – Margaret Sanger's Health Center in Manhattan, New York, US, February 11, 2017.

( REUTERS / Andrew Kelly)

Karen Lieber joined anti-abortion activists protesting in front of Planned Parenthood, Far Northeast Surgical Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, February 11, 2017.

(REUTERS / Charles Mostoller)

Anti-abortion supporters Marian Rumley, Taylor Miller and Sophie Caticchio from Minnesota listen to speeches at the March National Rally for Life in Washington January 22, 2016. The rally marks the 43rd anniversary of the US Supreme Court's 1973 abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade.

(REUTERS / Gary Cameron)

The Franciscan Friars Minor gathering between The Supreme Court of the United States and The Capitol Building during the 44th Annual March for Life January 27, 2017 in Washington, DC. Anti-abortion advocates descend on the US capital on Friday for an annual march to the largest crowd in years, with the White House spotlighting the cause and throwing its weight behind the campaign.

(ZACH GIBSON / AFP / Getty Images )

Pro-choice and pro-life activists demonstrate on the steps of the United States Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 in Washington, DC. In a 5-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down one of the nation's toughest restrictions on abortion, a Texas law group said it would close more than three quarters of the state's clinics to close.

[Photo by Pete Marovich / Getty Images]

Pro-life activists pray on the steps of the United States Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 in Washington, DC. In a 5-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down one of the nation's toughest restrictions on abortion, a Texas law group said it would close more than three quarters of the state's clinics to close.

[Photo by Pete Marovich / Getty Images]

Pro-choice demonstrators at the US Supreme Court cheers as they learn to stagger down the Texas abortion law on Monday, June 27, 2016.

[Photo by Bill Clark / CQ Roll Call]

View of demonstrators in front of the United Nations as they protest abortion ban in Poland, New York, New York, April 17, 2016.

[Photo by Chuck Fishman / Getty Images]




HIDE CAPTION

SHOW CAPTION

"This is a ban on This is blatantly unconstitutional based on more than 40 years of precedent that has been reaffirmed by the Supreme Court over and over again, "said Brigitte Amiri, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union Reproductive Freedom Project.

From there, the 1965 "The ACLU has come to terms with the bill's constitutionality." Ohio almost wants to have the case reviewed again, said Drexel University's professor of law, David S. Cohen, the co-author of a forthcoming book, "Obstacle Course: The Struggle to Get Abortion in the United States. "

" The lower courts will say that the law's unconstitutional. "There's no wiggle room on that," he said.

From there, Cohen said, it could take several years to reach the supreme

But in the meantime, there's a possibility that the Supreme Court wants to hear a number of other challenges to Roe v. Court. Wade first, seeking as Indiana's ban on abortions for fetal anomalies, as Down Syndrome and Alabama's proposed prohibition on a second-trimester abortion procedure.

"Ohio is obviously doing something radical and unconstitutional, but they're doing something that they Roe v. Wade, "Cohen said."

Porter, the bill's author, said the legislation is "crafted in such a way." that it actually does not have to bring down "Roe v.

Currently, Roe v. Wade but rather changes that mark the Supreme Court uses for determining life in unborn babies. The mark that the court It's a great big guess, "Porter said.

Carol Sanger, Columbia University's a law professor and author of "About Abortion: Terminating Pregnancy in 21st Century America," said states have a chance to pass by Roe v. Wade.

"It's like a badge of honor," she said.

She said it was "unlikely" the Supreme Court would take on the Ohio bill and felt that would result in Roe v. Wade being overturned did not exist in this case.

But Porter expressed confidence that the high court would hear it.

"This is the heartbeat bill with open arms "Porter said. "I trust that Gov. Kasich wants to ruin his political future and never be able to call himself pro-life again."


Source link