قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / Avengers: Endgame Review – Is anyone really dead in the Marvel movie?

Avengers: Endgame Review – Is anyone really dead in the Marvel movie?

Editor's note: There are spoilers in this story.

There is a point in Avengers: Endgame when Thanos learns of the flaw of his plan, which was to snap his fingers and kill half of all living beings to make the universe a better place do. Why destroy half of the universe if it destroys and rebuilds the entire universe as it does without these annoying avengers? After all, the life he gives and the life he takes away is less important than the end result.

It is striking that this is exactly the concept on which Marvel built the three Avengers films, where nothing is important and there are no consequences. not even in life or death.

Back in the late evening hours, the Marvel brand was in trouble. "It seemed like something old. Comics were a niche. Nobody has seen the value of it, "said Marvel Studios' original boss, Avi Arad, in an Vanity Fair Oral History of Iron Man . It did not help that in those days the characters for whom Marvel had the rights were what a headline called "B-List Heroes". Today's Marvel Studios boss, Kevin Feig, recalled Comic-Con in 2006: "If anyone asked," is The Avengers possible at all? "We had no real plans at the time. It was a pipe dream. "

No one expected that more than a decade later, this pipe dream would become the world's most popular and profitable franchise ̵

1; one of 22 interconnected films. It's a spectacular achievement that has fundamentally changed the fundamentals of the entertainment industry. Everyone wants a cinematic universe: Star Wars DC, Jurassic World Game of Thrones Harry Potter The Joker (?), Universal Monsters etc

The Dream is to create an endless entertainment object that never dies. When it comes to the massive, Avengers: Endgame which, along with the upcoming Spider-Man movie, completes this phase of Marvel films, whatever that means – it feels hard to actually end anything , Since we are very clear, the Marvel Cinematic Universe will never end. Our great-grandchildren will enjoy compulsory Iron Man screenings remastered at Disney State University for immersive VR. Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop will eventually use a human fetus to create endless clones of Chris Hemsworth to make sure he can be Thor for all eternity (not a terrible idea, frankly speaking).

  null "title =" null "class =" Lazyimage Lazyoad "data-src =" https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/lst1960-v070-trl-1106 -1556123675.jpg? Crop = 0.532xw: 1.00xh; 0.254xw, 0 & resize = 480: * "/> </picture></div>
<div class=
Robert Downey Jr.'s Tony Stark floats in space and dies the first time in this movie that he dies almost, but does not die.


So what's Avengers: Endgame the end of exactly?

I'll jump right here, consider this as a spoiler alert For those who did not expect this to happen.

Seriously, big spoilers will come, so stop reading if you do not want to know.

Here they come …

  Los Angeles World Premiere by Marvel Studios

Jeremy Renner and Scarlett Johansson at LA premiere of Avengers: Endgame on April 23. Renner's character Hawkeye gets a shocking amount of time in the film.

Alb erto E. Rodriguez Getty Images

Iron Man dies. Tony Stark uses the Infinity Gauntlet to destroy Thanos and his army and save humanity. Captain America gets … old. He travels back in time to spend the rest of his life with Margaret Carter. Black Widow dies and sacrifices himself so Hawkeye can get the Soulstone.

This seems to be a very clear ending for characters we've known for a decade. This seems to be the end we gave in Avengers: Endgame . But it's not really that, is it?

Avengers: Infinity War ended with Thanos & # 39; Snap, who killed half the universe – including a number of Avengers that we know already have movies. The fans literally sobbed in the theater. They felt real feelings. They mourned for these characters. But half way through Avengers: Endgame this snap is reversed, as many fans (and those who knew Disney had more Black Panther and Guardians films) guess.

To stop Thanos, the remaining Avengers use the Quantum Empire to return in times when they knew they could find an Infinity Stone and pack it before Thanos. In the end, Captain America travels on his own into the past to cover the rocks (supposedly setting the timeline in a way I do not really buy), but decides to stay and live his life. I would like to watch a concurrent drama about the normal life of Captain America if he destroys the universe a few times and does nothing about it. There is another new movie idea, Disney.

Like the danger of introducing time travel into a film that does not explicitly refer to time travel, it creates a paradox that makes it difficult for viewers to connect with the film. They experienced the emotional trauma of Thanos' snapshot, but narratively said, the resolution in Avengers: Endgame is a simple solution that essentially addresses the events of Avengers: Infinity War makes no sense. Even Gamora, who seemed completely dead to the soul stone after the sacrifice of Thanos, was brought back in a way thanks to time travel.

  null "title =" null "class =" Lazyimage Lazyoad "data-src =" https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/jtt3180-v017-1060-1556126327 .jpg? crop = 0.52739130434781xw: 1xh; center, top & resize = 480: * "/> </picture></div>
<div class=
These two are much in the new movie! They will not die, you'll see more of them forever.

Marvel [19659012] Is Theoretically not possible for The Avengers to travel back in time to a certain date and rescue Natasha or Tony or get the other Captain America or other infinite possibilities – should we truly believe that somebody is really dead at some point in time? ?

The idea of ​​time travel completely destroys the entire narrative The Marvel Cinematic Universe ensures that there can never really be any consequences for an action The Avengers failed in Avengers: Infinity War and then Why is not Infinity War important? Why is everything important? (I understand that there is a precedent for time travel and the multiverse in the comic source material, but it was mainly used to explain the jumbled universe of Marvel comics, which for thousands is a viable solution to comics, but one A comparatively tight collection of films deviates from Marvel's obsessively narrow narrative structure.)

Avengers: Endgame is a fun movie, but it's impossible not to frustrate how Marvel tripped on the landing. [19659030] These are the questions I could not avert during the entire time Avengers: Endgame . For three hours I had a kind of superhero existence crisis. Am I thinking too deeply about this topic? Absolutely not, because the MCU requires you to think too deeply into it. Fans spent a full year writing in-depth scholarly articles analyzing the tactics the Avengers could use to defeat Thanos.

If we know anything about the Marvel Cinematic Universe, there is no mission and nobody really dies. If it is so easy to bring back someone who is dead, do we really have to grieve? If people get bored with the new heroes in ten years' time, could Disney not revive Tony Down by Robert Downey Jr.? It's hard to feel anything at all when the light from Arc Reactor disappears into his chest. Shall we mourn for Scarlett Johansson's Natasha Romanoff if she has her own solo movie? Yes, this is supposed to be a prequel, but if things go well, would not Disney tend to bring them back?

It does not help that the movie is essentially split into two unequal halves. Part one is the grieving avengers, who deal with their failure and try to work out a plan. This part also devotes a shocking time to Hawkeye just to lay the foundations for the upcoming Hawkeye series with Jeremy Renner. Is anyone interested in Hawkeye? I certainly do not know, and Renner does not see it that way either.

In the second half, with a very abrupt moment, everyone is back and everyone is fighting against Thanos with little to no warning. After the tedious lengths in which the first half of the movie explains the timeline and the quantum realm, none of these details really makes sense. I wish all of my parents good luck trying to explain to their six-year-old the quantum mechanics and the butterfly effect of time travel. Because this movie does not do that at all.

I am absolutely impressed by what Marvel has been doing for the last ten years – from almost obscure to the biggest thing in the world. They did it in a spectacular way and found the perfect formula to make each of these films perfect. Avengers: Endgame does what all the great Marvel movies do – it's a fun and funny action movie made by people who are experts. However, it is impossible not to fret about Marvel stumbling on the landing – he has not been able to build actual stakes in this universe, instead introducing concepts that break the foundations of the story they are trying to narrate. It is an insult to all fans who cried at the end of the Infinite War (19459005). This is a movie that makes Infinity War essentially meaningless. This is a movie that ends in the same battle we've already seen. This is a movie that ends with the defeat of the greatest evil villain these heroes will ever encounter. But then they fight against another, who is also big and bad, but maybe bigger and more evil than Thanos.

What's next? Well, more Marvel movies. More X-Men movies. Other Black Panthers and Guardians and Captain Marvel films. Other villains of lesser importance to Thanos, or perhaps more villains that are getting stronger. There will be more heroes, more villains, more CGI bouts, more deaths (maybe?), More deaths (likely), more sequels and spin-offs and TV series and toys and money and more money.

Source link