قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Betsy DeVos kicks off in court

Betsy DeVos kicks off in court







  Betsy DeVos "(Betsy DeVos) /> </source></source></source></source></picture>
            </div><figcaption>
<p>
                  Education Minister Betsy DeVos and other conservatives said the former government's approach was too careless and too expensive for taxpayers. Alex Wong / Getty Images </p>
</figcaption></figure>
<div class=

Education

The judges have denied the Education Secretary's attempts to disrupt or change various policies of the Obama era.

Attempts by Minister of Education Betsy DeVos To the This is a roadblock: Federal Courts.

The judges have rejected DeVos's attempts to change Obama's policy, which includes everything from student loans to compulsory ones Arbitration agreements up to racial differences in special education

History below

As a result, the education department is forced To implement the Obama era policy that the Trump government has been struggling to stop – Stymyi DeVos's efforts to quickly make conservative federal education policy over the last two years.

The latest litigation occurred earlier this month when a federal judge unlawfully ordered DeVos to request a regulation urging states to identify school districts where there are significant racial differences between students enrolled in special education programs , Last week, Ministry of Education officials began implementing a comprehensive package of Obama-era student loan schemes after DeVos filed a lawsuit last fall.

The department has already spent $ 150 million on student debt under these guidelines, which DeVos believes are too expensive for taxpayers and unfair for higher education institutions. Department officials also instructed colleges not to sign compulsory arbitration agreements with the students and forced them to implement an Obama era policy that largely prohibited this practice.

Further legal challenges are in the pipeline. A federal judge allowed a challenge to the continuation of the DeVos rules for online colleges. And a lawsuit over Trump's delays in signing the Obama administration, which seeks to prevail against nonprofit colleges, is always ripe for a decision.

The judges in the cases decided so far said the Trump administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act and ruled that the department's efforts to postpone the guidelines were arbitrary or had no substantiated basis.

"There is a reluctance or inability for the Department of Education to comply with the Basic Law on federal behavior," said Toby Merrill, who heads the Harvard Law School on Predator Credits, which has filed some of the lawsuits against DeVos.

Every government has gains and defeats in court, Merrill said, but most have done better to ensure that they comply with the street's regulatory rules.

"At least they are crossing their points and scoring is and therefore less prone to some of the procedural challenges that have so many of the Ministry of Education's guidelines been destroyed," she said.

The rejection of Trump's efforts Government delaying the policy, the judges have largely oriented procedural problems.The federal judge, who had defeated DeVos' shift in regulations for student loans, called them delays as "unlawful", "procedurally invalid" and "arbitrary and moody" The judge, who refused to delay a special training rule, accused DeVos of failing to give "reasoned reasons" statement "for stopping the directive.

The government is committed to correcting the regulatory overreach of the previous administration, and will continue to be just and fair Implement regulatory reform in court, "said education spokeswoman Liz Hill.

Many of the directives at issue in the lawsuits deal with student loan awards. The Obama administration began to pay the debts of some students who were cheated out of college after the collapse of Corinthian Colleges, a massive for-profit chain of colleges.

DeVos and other conservatives said the former administration's approach was too lenient and too expensive for taxpayers. However, efforts by the Trump administration to reduce the amount of loan forgiveness for some betrayed student loans have been blocked in court.

The judge ruled in this case that the Department of Education violated the Federal Data Protection Act when it came up with a new formula for loan forgiveness that set the level of debt relief that a borrower with an average graduate income would receive academic program. The Trump government has appealed the verdict to the Ninth Circle, where it is pending.

In another case, which included provisions from the Obama era calling for more consumer disclosures to students from online colleges, a judge chastised the Trump government's arguments for a delay.

The judge wrote that "the chutzpah" is required for the education department to say that it would be too burdensome for the universities to communicate the disclosures to the students and also argue that the students "should be able The judge did not decide on the merits of the case raised by a teachers' union, but admitted the lawsuit.

The Obama Education Division also had legal setbacks in its regulatory agenda A federal judge condemned the Obama administration's first attempt to tighten the rules for profit-making schools and other vocational colleges rewritten by officials during Obama's second term, and the Obama administration was similarly forced to adopt another set of rules for online Repeat college programs after a federal judge threw them out Recently, a federal judge found that the Obama administration's decision to unlawfully revoke a large accredited for-profit college accused tens of thousands of pages of evidence.

The Trump administration welcomed this decision and immediately reinstated the accredited academic.

And although the Trump Education Department also had some victories in court. A federal judge rejected the majority of a lawsuit filed by advocacy groups last year to challenge DeVos' new guidelines on how colleges must address sexual assault.

But the Trump administration has witnessed a particularly notable defeat in the courts overall. The Washington Post reports this week on data maintained by the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law.

The legal setbacks to DeVo's efforts to stop Obama's education-era policy are also due to the well-organized coalition of consumer groups, Democratic Attorney Generals and oversight organizations led by many alumni of the Obama administration Everyone is focused on questioning the Trump government's agenda at every turn.

"This government likes to pretend the rules do not apply to them," said Aaron Ament, a former official of the Obama Administration's Department of Education, who has tried DeVos as head of the National Student Legal Defense Network.

"The Administrative Procedure Act does not mean that you should contact the backers of your company and do what they ask," Ament said. "As long as DeVos continues to be based on political purpose rather than what is best for students, it will continue to face challenges and continue to lose in court."


Source link