New Unauthorized Diving Risks
Last week, the FAA released a statement on a new risk that Boeing must mitigate. The new risk does not affect the MACS, but could lead to similar results, according to the Seattle Times.
The Federal Aviation Administration noted that data processing by a jetliner computer could cause the aircraft to submerge in a manner that pilots had, according to two intrigued persons who requested it, Unless they were named, they recovered only with difficulty.
The problem was not related to the maneuverability augmentation system that has been linked to the two accidents since October that killed 346 people. According to a person who was not authorized to discuss the matter, it could be an unauthorized dive similar to the crashes.
David Learmount, flight safety officer at Flight Global and former Royal Air Force pilot, said details of the new issue are patchy, but it is possible that it could further delay MAX's return. "The implication is that this is another piece of software in another control computer that has similar symptoms," he said. "Controlling an airplane with computers, as we do now, is always a danger."
Boeing agreed with the findings of the FAA, but has not yet presented a solution to the FAA.
DoJ Probe Expands Dreamliner
The Seattle Times DOJ probe is said to go beyond the Boeing 737 MAX, including 787 Dreamliners.
The US Attorney's Office has summoned Boeing's records of production of the 787 Dreamliner in South Carolina, which allegedly contained allegations of inferior vehicles, according to two sources familiar with the investigation.
The summons was issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ), sources said. DOJ is also conducting a criminal investigation into the certification and design of the 737 MAX after two fatal crashes of the aircraft. The 787 subpoena significantly extends the scope of the Boeing DOJ security review.
MAX's investigation by the grand jury was kept secret, but some Ministry of Justice activities were known as summons by prosecutors for documents. Allegations regarding the 787 Dreamliner, according to the third source and according to the prosecution, focus on poor work and cuts at the plant in South Carolina.
a person in South Carolina who also spoke on the condition of anonymity because it is a delicate matter. This could include the pressure to sign erroneous work to avoid delays in delivering aircraft to customers, the source noted.
The entire [Dreamliner] fleet was shut down in January 2013 following two battery overheating events: a battery fire on an empty 787 parked at the gate of Boston Airport, then a smoldering battery on a flight in Japan Forced landing forced. The FAA laid the foundation in April 2013 after Boeing modified the jets with charged batteries, containment and venting hoses.
In the 737 MAX investigation, prosecutors seem to be receiving information from someone who knows the plane's development on the questions they are asking, the third source said.
$ 9 per hour Programmer with no flying experience
Sloppy work and rough edges? Uh … Yes.
Bloomberg reports [Boeing’s 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers] (Boeing's 737 Max Software was outsourced to engineers for $ 9 an hour).
The mystery remains at the heart of Boeing Co's 737 Max Crisis: Like a The company known for its meticulous design apparently made basic software bugs that resulted in two deadly crashes. Long-time Boeing engineers said the effort was made more difficult by outsourcing work to low-paid contractors.
Max Software, plagued by issues that could keep the planes on the ground for months after the US regulators uncovered a new flaw this week, was developed at a time when Boeing dismissed experienced engineers Suppliers urged to cut costs.
Increasingly, the famous American aircraft manufacturer and its suppliers trusted temporary workers to provide only $ 9 per hour for developing and testing software. Offices opposite the Boeing Field in Seattle have recently been released by the Indian software developer HCL Technologies Ltd. hired college graduates occupy several desks, said Mark Rabin, a former Boeing software engineer who worked in a flight test group supporting Max.
HCL's coders were typically designed to Boeing specifications. Still, "it was controversial because it was far less efficient than Boeing engineers who just wrote the code," Rabin said. Often he recalled: "I did not make many rounds because the code was not properly made ."
Boeing not only benefited from cheap programmers who did not know it Bloomberg notes that Boeing's cultivation of Indian companies seemed to pay other dividends.
Boeing received several orders for Indian military and commercial aircraft in January 2017, including a $ 22 billion contract for the delivery of SpiceJet Ltd. 100 737-Max 8 jets, representing the largest Boeing contract ever undertaken by an Indian airline in a country dominated by Airbus.
Reason to Accept
The Wall Street Journal reports that the Boeing 737 MAX was expected to be groundless by the end of this year.
Boeing Co.'s troubled 737 MAX fleet is expected to remain flat due to the recent flight control problem reported by US aviation security regulators by the end of this year.  029] At least the setback is likely to cause additional disruption to US and overseas flight schedules, with around 500 aircraft idling for months longer than previously projected.
During simulator testing of certain emergency procedures, FAA pilots uncovered a potentially dangerous situation they had not experienced before. According to the Boeing official and the airline, the crux of the problem is that failure of a chip in the aircraft's flight control computer may result in unauthorized movement of a panel at the rear of the aircraft, nose down. 19659031] Testing the emergency procedures to address this so-called out-of-control stabilizer condition has shown that average pilots would take longer than expected to identify and counteract the problem.
Damn these simulators
If you use real flight simulators instead of having problems with the iPad. Boeing has always insisted that iPads are all pilots needed for training.
No new parts required
"We believe that this can be updated through a software fix," said a Boeing official.
Of course it is like this.
It could take many months if the 737 fleet needed new parts.
What can possibly go wrong?
Boeing adopted a 1964 draft and overloaded him with huge engines that made the aircraft unstable. then depended on poorly designed software that can not simply be overridden to protect the aircraft from crashes while training can take place on an iPad.
What could possibly go wrong with this series of cost savings decisions?
Unfortunately, we just found out.
But even after the second crash, Boeing asked the FAA to keep the plane on duty.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock