ATLANTA – John R. Bolton, former National Security Advisor to President Trump, is aware of "many relevant meetings and talks" in connection with the pressure campaign in Ukraine, which investigators are still unaware of, said his lawyer Friday to the legislators.
The lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, did so in a letter to the Lords Attorney in response to the House of Commons chairmen who had challenged Mr Bolton's testimony in their impeachment trial, but did not agree to appear in court to obtain one, pay attention to it to force it.
Mr. Cooper did not elaborate on the meetings and conversations he referred to, leaving the House Democrats to guess what he might know.
The House Chairmen have withdrawn a subpoena for Mr. Kupperman, stating that they would not look for Mr. Bolton because they said they did not want to be involved in protracted legal proceedings. Instead, the Democrats have suggested that Mr. Bolton's and Mr. Kupperman's refusal to testify be used as evidence of President's obstruction of Congress. Mr Kupperman denied that they were trying to postpone the proceedings and insisted that their legal counterparts be Position is not aligned with the White House. Mr Cooper argued that if the house was serious about an investigation, Mr Bolton would be a logical person to be questioned.
Bolton "personally participated in many events, meetings, and conversations that you have already witnessed, as well as many relevant discussions and discussions that have not been discussed in the testimonies," Cooper wrote in the letter.
Many witnesses who have testified so far put Mr Bolton at the center of the main events and described him as angry over the efforts of the people around the president – led by his personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani – under pressure Ukraine investigates against Democrats. He said he wanted nothing to do with the "drug deal", he said, orchestrating the other presidential adviser, and called Mr. Giuliani a "hand grenade that will blow up everyone".
He Also Called Helpers Report to a White House lawyer about her dealings with Gordon D. Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union involved in the pressure campaign. He also rejected Mr. Trump's decision to suspend $ 391 million in security aid to Ukraine and the decision to call President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on July 25. do us a favor "and examine Ukraine's ties to Democrats in 2016 and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son Hunter Biden.
Unlike most who have testified so far, Mr. Bolton would, however, bring in knowledge of what the President himself said about the matter. Most witnesses have described what the people around the president said, but few reported direct talks with Mr. Trump. As his national security adviser who visited him daily, Mr. Bolton could probably bring investigators to the Oval Office, as none of their witnesses did.
The House Democrats have argued that the ongoing lawsuit is forcing Donald F. McGahn II, the former president, to overturn a White House lawyer speaking on other matters to Mr. Bolton and Mr. Kupperman. But Mr. Cooper said a final verdict on Mr. McGahn would still not answer the question of whether his clients should testify because they would be questioned on national security issues as Mr. McGahn would not.
Mr. Cooper cited McGahn's own statement by the House Judiciary Committee, stating that the jury's interest in the former White House lawyer "did not address the sensitive issues of national security or foreign policy."
"Unlike McGahn's information on national security and foreign affairs are at the center of the impeachment investigation of the committees, and it is hard to imagine which issue the committees to Mr. Kupperman or Mr. Bolton would not affect these sensitive areas, "Cooper wrote.