قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Brennan says he's ready to take Trump to court for security clearance

Brennan says he's ready to take Trump to court for security clearance



Former CIA director John O. Brennan said on Sunday he was ready to bring President Trump to justice to prevent other current and former officials from lifting their security powers, a dispute over whether the president holds power Abused

"I will do everything I can to try to prevent these abuses in the future, and if it means going to court, I'll do that," Brennan said in an appearance on NBC News "Meet the press."

Brennan, who is among Trump's most outspoken critics, abruptly revoked his White House security check last week. Since then, Brennan said on Sunday, a number of lawyers have contacted him and given advice to prosecute a possible injunction to prevent Trump from undertaking similar actions in the future.

"If my clearances ̵

1; and my reputation as I am" I'm being pulled through the mud now – if that's the price we have to pay to stop Donald Trump doing this against other people, that is a small prize for me, "said Brennan.

He Did not (19659006) When interviewed by Fox News Channel about a possible lawsuit filed by Brennan during a Sunday Morning Futures event, Rudolph W. Giuliani described Trump's personal lawyer, this as a welcome opportunity

"I would voluntarily take this case for the president. I would love to have Brennan oathed, "Giuliani said. "We'll find out about Brennan and we'll find out what a terrible job he has done."

On Friday, 14 former CIA directors and deputy directors of Republican and Democratic governments, as well as a former director of National Intelligence, called Trump's revocation of Brennan's release a blatant attempt to "stifle the freedom of speech" and an "inappropriate and profound send regrettable "signal to other officials.

As the turmoil around Trump intensified, the president showed no sign of support. According to high-ranking government officials, the White House has written documents that revoke the clearance of other current and former officials who have punished Trump for criticizing him or played a role in the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 elections (19659010) "Meet interviewing the press, Brennan also defended his previous statement Trump's performance at a summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki last month as a "traitor." Some of Brennan's critics have argued that the remark his criticism of Trump in the non-partisan urged territory.

"I called his behavior" treacherous, "which is to betray his trust and help and support the enemy," Brennan said. "I am very much in favor of this claim."

Brennan received support from Mike Mullen, a retired Navy Admiral and former Chief of Staff, on Sunday. He said Trump's threat to revoke the security clearance of those critical of him is a sign that the president "made a list of political enemies."

Mullen said that while Trump has the authority to extract the security clearance from former national intelligence agencies and other officials, it is incredibly problematic. "

" It immediately brings back the whole concept of the "enemies list" under President Nixon, "Mullen said in an appearance on" Fox News Sunday, "adding that it also recalled the anti-communist crusade in the 1950s He was led by Joseph McCarthy,

Mullen said he does not support Brennan as critically as he was with Trump, but believes that the former CIA director and others need not fear that this is the case because of their criticism of them

"I'm worried about the whole question of freedom of speech. And as long as John does not reveal any secret information he should not divulge, I believe he has the right to speak, "Mullen said.

Former CIA Director Michael V. Hayden, whose security service warned the White House, insisted Also at risk of revocation, CNN said during a State of the Union appearance that the relationship between the president and the national security community was "dangerously close to being permanently broken."

"Frankly, though, John's situation That's the obvious reason for us signing and protesting all the letters, I think it's another straw that overcomes the keg, "Hayden said." Our complaint is not just about it. It's all about the tone, the tenor and the behavior of the government.

Former National Intelligence Director James R. Clapper Jr. sounded similar and said on CNN that Brennan's rhetoric "has become an issue in and of itself," his remarks are indicative of "genuine concern over the Endangering or threatening our institutions and values.

Others gathered on Sunday morning for Trump's defense.

National Security Advisor John Bolton supported the idea of ​​formally reviewing whether former officials should retain their safety clearance and said that Brennan "may have crossed the line." [19659020] "I think some people have said that he could not be in the position to criticize President Trump and his – secret collusion with Russia, unless he used secret information," Bolton said in an interview ABC News "This Week," although he added that he has no knowledge of a single concrete instance

"What I know was when he was director of the CIA, I was very worried about his behavior, through remarks he made had made in public and through its politicization of intelligence agencies, "the national security adviser added.

Bolton said he was one Political disagreement is not considered to be sufficient reason for an official to have obtained security clearance, but breach of the separation between intelligence and politics would be justification.

He said that "senior intelligence officials officials from career reporting who come out of the government" should "keep this wall of separation between intelligence and politics, and Brennan did not do that, Bolton later added," There is a line and someone can cross it. "

Bolton said it was time to review safety clearance guidelines for former US officials.

" I think it is certainly appropriate at a time when we see what I believe is unprecedented They have top secret information to ask how many people have clearances, how many people have received this very sensitive information, both within the government and in the case of former officials, "he said," so I do not see that it would be a mistake if it were determined to go so as to review the policy of past officials. "

In an interview on" Fox News Sunday, "Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) defended also revoked Trump's revocation of Brennan's release, saying that the former CIA director "misused his privilege" by describing Trump's behavior as "treacherous."

"He is one of the leaders of the resistance movement. I understand why President Trump is quite frustrated, "Johnson said.

Elise Viebeck, Karen DeYoung and Josh Dawsey contributed to this report.


Source link