A court ruling in California ordering coffee companies to put cancer labels on their products does not change the minds of scientists and health professionals who say that there is no credible evidence (19659004) Some say that, despite a well-intentioned intention, which may have prompted Judge Elihu Berle of the Supreme Court on Wednesday to unnecessarily confuse and even scare people.
Many studies bind a chemical, acrylamide ̵
"The substance is contained in many of our foods, not just coffee," says Lichtenfeld, who has been involved in oncology for decades. "There was a slight fear that it would be in French fries and foods cooked at higher temperatures, it's very difficult to show a direct cause of cancer, you always have to put a [suspected] risk into perspective."
I'll come right back and say we have other areas that we need to pay more attention to, "he said. "Smoking and obesity are some of those [risky] areas."
The Council on Education and Research on Toxic, a nonprofit group, sued Starbucks and about 90 other companies, including grocery stores and retail outlets, under state law requiring alerts on a variety of chemicals that can cause cancer. One of these chemicals is acrylamide, a carcinogen found in coffee.
The coffee industry claimed that the chemical is present in harmless quantities and should be exempted from the law, as it naturally results from the cooking process necessary to make the beans spicy.
The decision came despite the concern expressed in recent years about the possible dangers of coffee, some studies found health benefits.
In 2016, the International Agency for Research on Cancer – the World Health Organization's cancer agency – has moved coffee out of its "potential carcinogen" list.
Studies show that coffee is unlikely to cause breast, prostate or pancreatic cancer, and it appears to lower the risks for liver and uterine cancer, the agency said. The evidence is not sufficient to determine its effect on dozens of other cancers.
"Coffee is linked to cancer development by the fact that coffee is sometimes drunk by living people and only living people develop cancer," said Robert A. Weinberg oncologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology at the Los Angeles Times
Kathryn M Wilson, a cancer epidemiologist at Harvard University who has studied the effects of acrylamide on humans, told the newspaper, "I think the evidence that acrylamide makes a difference to human cancer risk is pretty weak … it's much more helpful For example, she noted that coffee is a source of antioxidants and has been shown in credible studies to have significant benefits, such as reducing the likelihood of liver cancer and type 2 diabetes
critics The lawsuit and, now, verdict, say it continues to feed on California's preference for rules about what they say is trivial d
For example, parking garages have to post the respiratory air there, so that motorists are exposed to carbon monoxide and gas and diesel exhaust and people should not stay longer than necessary. Among other things, there are also warnings in elevators and at airports.
"I remember seeing one in a parking garage during my first state visit," writer Alexander Nazaryan said in a commentary in the Los Angeles Times. What should people do, not park their cars? "
Lichtenfeld said California's laws and regulations are" often different than in other parts of the country. "
The state, he said, was in In some cases B has been helpful as it has been sensitized nationwide to the benefits of reducing car emissions.
"But sometimes you can get so far into the weeds that you have a law or regulation that is well meant, but where the practical application in our lives is very limited," Lichtenfeld said.
Too many health warnings can also have the inadvertent effect of overpowering and confusing people, causing them to miss both important and less urgent information.
"It might be counterproductive, people are starting to pay less attention."