Home / US / Chief Justice John Roberts wants to show his cards

Chief Justice John Roberts wants to show his cards

It was a meager sum for a week in June, the last month of the annual meeting. In addition, two of the three voices were unanimous and no one made big headlines.

But the term will not end like this. And much of the weight of this momentous session lies on Robert's shoulders.

This is the first time in Roberts & # 39; 14 years as Chief Justice that he will likely be the deciding voice in several final, tense cases – a total of 24 in the next two weeks. Roberts landed in the ideological center of the court last year when Judge Anthony Kennedy retired after three decades in office. And because Roberts has long been on the right of Kennedy, the court is prepared for a sharp conservative turn.

Last Friday, Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the high-ranking liberals of the court, warned against a torrent of 5-4 decisions and said Kennedy's resignation would be "of the utmost consequence" for pending cases.

While close observers of the court predicted that such a prediction for nearly a year will have a different magnitude, emanating from a judiciary, the first-hand witnesses are the private votes of the court in its closed conference room. Ginsburg knows where the majority controls.

Two of the most politically charged cases where settlement is pending and the census issue is being considered by 2020 could lead to decisions that favor the interests of the Republican Party and strengthen the party-political nature of a court made up of five of them the GOP appointed and consists of four Democratic members.

is a signal that Roberts ̵

1; who always insists that the court is a neutral actor – does not want to send out, although in the past both would have put him on the Republican side.

  The Supreme Court may have already decided the census case. Will the new revelations play a role?

"People need to know that we do not do politics," he said at a Belmont University show in Nashville in February. "You must know that we do something else, that we apply the law."

Conflicts over such interpretations of the law and the seething environment in the nation's capital undoubtedly contribute to lengthy disagreements behind the scenes on Citizenship Question to the 2020 Census; whether the judges will be allowed to circumcise partisans that make it almost impossible to disempower the controlling party in a state; and whether a 40-foot cross, a World War I monument known as the Peace Cross, can remain in Maryland on public grounds can answer all three questions. It is certain that the nation is heading for another 5-4 decisions. It is also likely that the 64-year-old chief of justice, who worries about the Supreme Court Square in these volatile times, will try to neutralize any appearance of politics.

In June 2018, when Roberts wrote the Five Righteousness In confirming President Donald Trump's travel ban on nationals from certain majority Muslim countries, he deferred the executive branch and insisted (against opposition from the four liberals): "This is an act that any other president could have taken. " RELATED: Roberts treats Trump like a normal president. Sotomayor says no way.

Decision on the Census

June is always difficult because judges in the hardest cases end their opinions and decide which pending appeals should be scheduled for the next term, which begins in October ,

  John Roberts has voted in favor of abortion restrictions. Will he overthrow Roe for Wade?

Roberts has said he tries to persuade colleagues to make cases as close as possible, with the possibility of greater consensus. Some cases contradict this goal, sometimes because of the Supreme Judge's own interest.

In the dispute over a citizenship issue at the census, Roberts expressed his willingness in April to accept the government's claim that Trade Minister Wilbur Ross wanted the question added to help the Ministry of Justice enforce the Voting Rights Act.

The State of New York and Democrat-dominated challengers reject these reasons as fictitious, citing analyzes by the Census Bureau that such a question would reduce the response rate of non-citizens and Hispanics. This could have consequences for the political power and money of the US government. The ten-year count is used to split seats in the US House of Representatives and allocate hundreds of billions of dollars in federal and state funds.

  The Census Bureau begins its examination of the citizenship issue while awaiting the Supreme Court ruling.

Since these April arguments, the American Civil Liberties Union and others have joined the legal challenge against the Trump administration Having found new evidence that the trade was trying to help the Republicans. They cited a newly published study from 2015 by Dr. med. Thomas Hofeller, a republican redistricting expert, said that "it would be beneficial for Republican and non-Spanish whites to use only the elective population for redistricting purposes."

The Supreme Court did not respond to the revelation, which was forwarded in a letter to the judges. In verbal arguments, however, Roberts clarified that judges should consider material that was not part of the previous court ruling in the case.

In public appearances, Roberts has downplayed his role at the head of the US government Supreme Court of the Nation. "There were 17 supreme judges and I would be very surprised if people here could call them," he said at Belmont University. "My point is that you are not guaranteed to play a significant role in your country's history, and it's not necessarily a bad thing if you do not."

presidency. He is also able to decide on the outcome of cases. It is not yet known how he will reconcile his institutional and ideological interests.

  The Inner Story of how John Roberts negotiated the rescue of Obamacare

Supreme Court judges can be unfathomable, and on Monday neither Roberts nor revealed his colleagues in the behavior in the courtroom, which is expected between June 17 (when the nine should return to the bank) and June 17 at the end of the month.

Speaking in New York last Friday, Ginsburg pointed out that the court would drop a series of controversial decisions and that the absence of Kennedy's steady influence would result.

Ginsburg referred to comparisons between the census dispute and the latter time because of "travel ban".

She referred to the reverence that the Roberts majority had shown the Trump administration in the latter, and concluded her discussion of the former with this remark: The challengers in the census case have argued that a decision in favor of Secretary Ross would extend the homage beyond the border.

  Judge Ginsburg warns that the court will be sharply divided over final cases

What is to be read in Ginsburg's speech, regardless of whether she intended it or not, Ginsburg has a reputation for leaving behind-the-scenes hints outside the courtroom.

In mid-June 2012, she said in a speech: "The term was more than usual exhausting. "That was just before a slim majority of the judges, with Roberts giving the crucial vote, upheld the bill on affordable care based on the surprising justification for taxation in Congress.

Source link