Three civil rights and interest groups filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday criticizing the recent move by the Trump government to severely restrict asylum for migrants on the southern border.
"Lee learned Deputy Director of Immigrants' Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement announcing the lawsuit." It clearly violates national and international law and can not exist.
The ACLU joined the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Center for Constitutional Rights in California on behalf of immigrant rights groups – the East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, Al Otro Lado, the Innovation Law Lab, and the Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles ̵
The lawsuit demands a statement "for the interim final The provision is unlawful and invalid" and a provisional and permanent A However, do not try to seek asylum there first.
The profound change was the latest policy of President Donald Trump, which aimed to restrict the influx of cen US families seeking asylum on the southern border, but many of the migrants from all over the world to the border between the US and Mexico could come.
The rule, published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, should come into force immediately and apply to immigrants entering or arriving at the US border on or after the effective date. This is a factor that drives irregular migration to the United States and allows the DHS and the DOJ to handle cases from the southern border faster and more efficiently, resulting in fewer people on a dangerous journey through Mexico travel.
Attorney General William Barr called the interim final a "lawful exercise of Congressional powers to restrict asylum".
McAleenan and Barr are also named in the lawsuit, along with Ken Cuccinelli, Acting Commissioner for Customs and Border Management, John Sanders, and Matthew Albence, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Control.
The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comments
In the past, federal judges have blocked other attempts by the government to change asylum policies, in particular the President's efforts to deny protection to anyone who not entered the US through a legal port of entry.
The rule provides for three limited exceptions for migrants who have been denied asylum in at least one other country from the US, who can demonstrate that they meet the definition of a "victim of a serious form of trafficking" or migrants who cross countries in The United States does not become party to three international treaties on asylum and refugees
The provision does not prevent migrants from engaging in two different forms of protection, namely the retention of deportation or exemption under the Convention against Torture have a much higher standard of proof than the standard in credible interviews, the first step in the asylum procedure, and are more limited than asylum.
The change is a one-sided move by the Trump government and has not been agreed by Mexico, and American officials negotiated a similar agreement with Guatemala, after which immigrants from El Salv ador and Honduras had to apply for asylum there. But this deal and a meeting with Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales were abruptly canceled after the Guatemalan Constitutional Court ruled against the proposal.
Immigrant rights groups denounced the rule as the "most outrageous" and "most extreme" policy proposed by the President aimed at asylum.
Under US and international law, a person may seek asylum on grounds of persecution or justified fear of future persecution on grounds of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or belonging to a particular social group. As a signatory to an international asylum agreement, the US is required by law to provide protection and certain rights to persons seeking asylum at the border.