Prior to this season, the NCAA announced that they would kill the RPI – the boring metric to determine who should do the NCAA tournament – and replace it with a new metric called NET. The move was a good move at first glance: The RPI was a terrible ranking system that was only considered in terms of winning odds, while NET "match scores, strength of the schedule, location, scoring, net offensive and defensive efficiency and But while the change seemed like an improvement, the first edition of the NET Rankings appeared today after a few weeks of play, and boy, they look awful from:
The quickest look at Kenpom shows just how this rating is.The state of Ohio (26th in Kenpom) has two impressive wins and four cupcakes Victories, but is considered better than the winner of Maui Invitational Gonzaga or the opponent they defeated in the final Duke Kansas – the victories over Michigan State, Marquette and Tenness ee is undefeated – is somehow below Loyola Marymount, whose best win against low Georgetown is. Belmont even slips into 12th place over teams like Auburn and North Carolina, thanks to victories over fearsome schools like Lipscomb and uh, Kennesaw State. rank Ohio State. But as Myron Medcalf of ESPN points out, there are two quirks of the NET formula. First, margins for the win are limited to a maximum of 10 points, which should prevent large teams from raising the score for small teams, but also means that the most impressive win of the season so far – Duke's 118-84 Drumbing of Kentucky – is effectively neutralized. Second, efficiency statistics are not important for the opponent's quality, which means that the average of one point per possession of a ball against Duke is worth less than 1.1 points per possession against Boston College.
So freaking out because your team did not do this Planning ahead and destroying Kennesaw State may be a bit legitimate. But for now, give it some time and enjoy the joy of the phrase "61st Place Kentucky Basketball".