قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Sports / Conley encore? Why adding another star is possible, but complicated

Conley encore? Why adding another star is possible, but complicated



Even after the unofficial announcement on Wednesday that Mike Conley will join jazz via a summer blockbuster trade, jazz fans were not done with dreams. By far the most common question in the wake of the business news was a variation on this question: Can the jazz win another star player and still let the agreed Conley deal through as negotiated?

Immediately after trading, I wrote that the mechanics of this trade are likely to mean that jazz has already taken a big step forward for the summer, and they are now concentrating on filling the squad. That's probably still the best short answer.

But let's get creative or specific … or creative specific or specific creative. There are opportunities for jazz to operate the Conley trade and still add a significant piece. It's just that they are all associated with significant logistical losses and significant costs in terms of the depth of Utah. But for the sake of completeness, let's examine it here.

Let's first set the conditions for this conversation with a few assumptions. Donovan Mitchell and Rudy Gobert go nowhere. For the sake of argument, I also assume that Joe Ingles will be in the jazz fitting room this October, as his value for his current club is likely to exceed his market value.

This leaves only Derrick Favors and Dante Exum to play, and I feel that jazz would only part with these two if something came in between that would be too good to get over it. Then there are Tony Bradley and three non-guaranteed players, whose salary is counted on trades only after the expiration date of the guarantee. Georges Niang and Royce O'Neale are not fancy anyway, as they both steal only $ 700,000 or more than a minimum stake. Neto ($ 2.1

5 million, not guaranteed until 7/9) is slightly more expensive and could therefore be included in a deal – or waive his salary and sign it again at least later.

I also go from 109 USD out of million cap.

OK, that's preparing the stage. Now we are getting weird. In the following legal scenarios, Utah Conley AND could add someone else, along with the specific complications of each scenario and the question of why this is a good or bad idea.

Option 1: Make the Planned Conley Deal and then Make Room for a Second Tier Free Agent

The Special Features: After jazz completed the Conley Trade announced Wednesday, they essentially become cut. Two minimum roster fees bring their crew salary back to the upper limit.

However, due to the late warranty date, they are flexible in contracting with Favours and could certainly find a buyer for Exum when needed, especially after some teams miss their favorite Free Agent destinations. Irrespective of the salary that jazz pays out after the trade is completed, it must spend on the open market, minus a fee for each additional job it opens.

The Resulting $: If the Jazz Forfeit favors, they must spend a little over $ 16 million. If they renounce him and trade Exum into someone's room, about $ 25 million. If they do both and cut Neto, just over $ 25 million.

The catch: None of these scenarios open a maximum slot, even for the lowest category of max players. If Bradley were ferried into space, they would be close to the maximum of 0-6 years, but they would probably cost an asset as well.

Players they could theoretically target: From high teens to mid-20s, you can probably end up with a Bojan Bogdanovic or Harrison Barnes type. And someone like Julius Randle or Nikola Mirotic should come cheaper than these two. They could also keep favors and simply swap exumes into space, which would enable them to join the MLE market (they would have essentially $ 8 million and change) for people like Al-Farouq Aminu or DeMarre Carroll.

Pros / Cons: This allows Utah to add a starting caliber that shoots forward. But without being able to reach the maximum range, talk about people who do not necessarily need to upgrade their favors in a vacuum. Utah's main goal after the agreement on Conley should be to increase the depth again and send Favors and Exum to a deal that is essentially a lateral movement to steer the depth in the opposite direction.

Option 2: Complete the proposed Conley deal, and then add a free agent using the sign-and-trade rules.

The Special Features: Once a team is back on the limit, it can continue to trade for as long as they match the incoming salary with the outgoing players. So when jazz handled the Conley deal on July 6th, they could turn around and use players – again, we're probably talking mostly about favors and exum, though Bradley could be used as a paymaster – to bring them back more salary.

The resulting $: It depends on who you are dealing with:

  • You can trade favors (after July 7th) and bring back $ 22.65 million.
  • You Can Trade and Return Exum $ 14.6M
  • You can trade Favors + Exum together and bring in just over $ 34M – a maximum slot for a veteran of 0-9 years!
  • Favors + Bradley $ 24.5
  • Exum + Bradley $ 16.5M
  • All three $ 36.6M

Players they could theoretically target: It depends on which scenario they use above However, theoretically, they could also target a maximum player like Tobias Harris or Khris Middleton (but no maximum player with that goal) 10+ years of experience like Al Horford).

The catch: The team that currently holds the pl The rights of ayer would have to bring Utah's assets (Favors + Exum) back on the market. The player must say yes AND the reigning team must be inclined and motivated to facilitate the deal. That is rarer. Only three NBA players have signed their current deals as a sign-and-trade transaction – and only one player is anywhere close to the max (Danilo Gallinari).

Pros / Cons: If the right player calls jazz on July 1st, he says, "Hey, I want to come, make it happen!" Then it's worth exploring. Once again, this road takes the depth of jazz and works only in collaboration with another team.

Option 3: Make the planned Conley Deal and then use the same over-the-cap rules to win a player under contract.

The Specials: The same baseline scenario as above, except you add this time A player already under contract is less complicated.

The resulting $: The same scenario as above: from teenagers to the maximum of 0-9 years, depending on who they trade.

Players they could theoretically target: It's hard to know which players are actually available. Gallinari costs $ 22.6 million, but I've insisted all summer that he does not fit. Kevin Love costs $ 29 million, but has gotten old. He has 60 missed games and is guilty of $ 120 million over the next four games. Then there are people like Gorgui Dieng and James Johnson who probably are not worth it, as they would not replace Favors' production and impact.

The catch: The other trading team would have to agree with Utah's desired sequencing, as this hypothetical deal would have to be done after the Conley swap and possibly also after Favors's guarantee date.

Pros / Cons: This lacks the complications associated with a sign-and-trade, but I just do not see any realistic deals that feel like safe upgrades.

Option 4: Sign a maximum player first, then add a third team to expand the Conley deal.

The Special Features: The current context of the Conley deal is an under-the-cap trade from the Utah perspective. But Memphis should not mind that as long as they have the agreed stuff. If Utah has changed the way deals are handled on July 6 after the expiration of the moratorium, they can add a non marquee AND Conley agent – but this costs them favors and execrations. This is how it would work:

Jazz would have to revoke (and revoke) its free agents and renounce Favors and Neto to create a pay gap of $ 32.7 million for veterinarians ages 0-9 Years represents the maximum. After signing a guy, they just have to find a team that wants to trade in Memphis and take Exum for free. The inclusion of Exum would allow Utah to complete Conley trading as an over-the-top deal without changing the already negotiated parts that go to Memphis.

The resulting $: $ 32.7 million

Players they could theoretically target: All up to and including the Harris / Middleton class of free maximum agents with nine or fewer years of experience.

The Hook: The potential deal breaker here is that Memphis should be willing to take Korver with full guarantee so that his entire salary is jazz. They may regard this as a significant departure from their agreed terms of trade, since otherwise they would be able to acquire and waive Korvers and pay less than half of their salary. The other (minor) catch is that Memphis and the team that buys Exum would somehow "touch" each other in the trade. Here's a simple solution: just add a top 55-protected selection or design right to a type that is unlikely to join the NBA.

Pros / Cons: Along with the similar profound concerns of losing both favors and exhumance for a single player, this one has the additional difficulty of only working if Memphis is involved. That said, there are probably players in the market for whom jazz would handle this headache.


All of these scenarios would cost Utah the much-needed depth and all provisions could prove insurmountable. For example, the sign-and-trade sounds great to Harris, unless Philly does not want favors and no exhum. Then Utah could investigate how to include Exum in the Memphis deal and make it over the limit, but if Memphis refuses to guarantee Korvers $ 7.5 million then it will be dead on arrival.

For that reason, I still think most likely scenario is that (and I say 83% jokingly) "boring" scenario.

Unless a differentiator, whom Utah loves positively, picks up the phone on July 1 and says, "Come and get me." The standard scenario most likely to come to the fore is this:

Option 5 : Make the Conley Deal, keep Favors and Exum, improve the list on the edges.

The Special Features: The experts already see this as jazz title contenders after landing Conley. So, do you have to run the risk of seeking another acquisition at the expense of Rotary-caliber talent? Utah could decide that it is more important to reach the quality of the players at the rotation points six to nine than a nominal revaluation (or, frankly, a lateral movement) of the fourth best player. Is Barnes better than favors in which it makes sense to decimate the bank? Is he even better? That is questionable.

Would you do it now for Harris, Middleton, or other people in this shift? Maybe yes. But I think if any of these guys are unavailable, Utah, with favors and exum that complement their new core, will go into October and meanwhile use smaller exceptions to find well-fitting, affordable rotation types.

The resulting $: The $ 4.76 million room MLE and minimum wage slots.

Players they could theoretically target: Utility player to fill in the background of the rotation. [19659002] The Hook: Nothing short of the hard work of finding rotary caliber dispensers at $ 1 million to $ 5 million. This is the least "catchy" of all scenarios as the Conley framework already exists.

Pros / Cons: In reality, Favors is a very good player. It's probably fair to call him Utah's third-best player from 2018-19 1 and he's better than most players who could realistically produce jazz through the capricades described in options 1 through 4. Sure, it sounds like more and more stars like a funny idea, but Gobert-Mitchell-Conley is a title worthy core with the right complementary pieces and with continued growth of Mitchell. If the perfect goal can not be found, there is a real case for not thinking it over.

  Dan Clayton

Dan has studied jazz basketball at close range for more than 10 years, including as a radio analyst for The Team's Spanish-language broadcasts from 2010 to 2014. The native Utahn lives in New York today. Dan Clayton “/>

  Dan Clayton

  • Utah Jazz

    19. June 2019

    The jazz did not wait until Julys free agency period to try their hand at breaking the ladder in a sudden … Read More

  • Utah Jazz

    17. June 2019

    NBA Design Week is Here, and Utah Jazz is poised to gain talent with their Turn, 23rd overall. It's by no … Read More

  • Utah Jazz

    14. June 2019

    You've heard it before: The NBA is a copycat league. Once a franchise company breaks new ground on the mountain top … Read More

  • Utah Jazz

    12. June 2019

    It should be fun to follow an NBA team, and Jimbo Rudding makes sure it is. Jimbo is our Salt City Hoops-based mailbag artist … Read More


Source link