قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / Dan Coats, director of the National Intelligence Service, is expected to resign

Dan Coats, director of the National Intelligence Service, is expected to resign



The former Senator, at a difficult time, became director of the National Intelligence Service – for a president who repeatedly made clear his distaste and distrust of intelligence services – and spent his administration term, contrary to Trump, to a constellation of over one Dozens of agencies that the President has publicly mocked, ignored and dismissed. The disturbing momentum has sparked one of Trump's more unusual presidential manifestations and raised questions about his motivations, particularly in connection with investigations into possible agreements between Moscow and members of his 2016 presidential campaign.

In May, Attorney General William Barr was ordered to review the Political Justice Department on the beginning of the investigation in Russia and the role of the intelligence services in this process.

At that time, Coats announced that Barr "All necessary information" to review the intelligence services in the Russian election attacks, but he warned the Attorney General Also, from being outclassed with what he outclasses, "long standing standards for protecting highly sensitive classified information whose disclosure would jeopardize our national security," Coats said in a statement.

Trump's apparent hostility and distrust of his own intelligence services made Coats his job as a director, arguably one of the most politically charged in Washington. His departure is just the last time that the highest officials of the President turned away.

Coats, former Indiana Ambassador and Republican Senator, praised his nonpartisan professionalism and served as the head of US espionage agencies and acted as Chief Adviser to the President on intelligence services in March 201

7.

Vice President Mike Pence was one of Coats' closest associates, as the two men share a long history dating back to their time in Congress.

But Trump and Coats Never Forged a Close Relationship The President repeatedly expressed disappointment over Coats and told the advisers that he saw Coats in line with other top officials, including former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis and the former chief of staff White House, John Kelly, Wanted to Hold Back Over a year, Trump confidants suggested coats could be fired.

Coats against Trump in North Korea

While Trump Was Complaining Regarding Coats in the past, White House officials seriously began to prepare for his dropping after Trump over a weekend on Presidents Day Had reported friends and consultants of coats.

Trump was still steaming out statements coats and other officials had made three weeks earlier when they presented an annual report on global threats to Congress. Coats reviewed the intelligence services and undermined the president's claims on topics such as Iran to Russia, climate change and IS status.

Trump was most irritated by Coats' assessment of North Korea. Despite the President's claim that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un would give up his nuclear weapons, Coats and the other officials said it was their assessment that Kim would probably never do so.

In the days before Coats's dismissal His supporters and the president's patrons turned to the media to frame the affair. Coats' allies worked to defend the former senator, while the president's friends tried to raise doubts about Coats and set the stage for Trump's move.

Chris Ruddy, a longtime Trump confidant, told CNN Christiane Amanpour on February 18 that he had "heard from White House sources that Director Coats's president was only generally disappointed. that there may be a change of leadership in this position. "

In the run-up to a second meeting between Trump and Kim scheduled for late February, Ruddy said:" I believe that on the eve of the North there is generally deep concern in Korea (Summit ) To have your director of the National Intelligence Service in open hearings that undercut your position was a very bad form. "

Coats' former colleagues came in his defense and questioned Trump's ability to deal with information that do not confirm his belief.

When rumors surfaced that Coats might be dropped, Senator Angus King, a man independent of Maine, told CNN's John Berman on February 19, "If Dan Coats is actually driven out, which I deeply hope will not be the case, because he is a great civil servant, but if he is – the message is, do not give me the facts. "

Republican Senator Susan Collins from Maine tweeted the following day:" DNI Coats is a good friend, former Senate colleague and integrity leader who has always served our country Frankness to lead our intelligence community. "

Ultimately, Trump quickly overhauled the discord and continued, leaving Coats in his role.

But the president seemed to revive the talks about the possible removal of Coats in July, and brought the idea to confidants and warm-up of old disappointments about the intelligence chief.

A high-ranking White House official confirmed at the time that there was some discussion that Coats is leaving his position because he has been in office for more than two years and is retiring.

Life in politics

The 76-year-old coats were used by the military for law studies. He joined the House of Representatives in 1981 and then joined the Senate before being appointed US Ambassador to Germany in 2001 during the first term of President George W. Bush. Coats returned to the Senate in 2011, where he served on the Intelligence and Armed Services Committees in 2017.

Prior to his election, Trump was asked in an interview with Fox News in August 2016 if he trusted intelligence services. "Not so much of the people who did it for our country," Trump said. "Look what's happened in the last 10 years, see what's happened in the last few years, it was catastrophic."

He continued, saying, "In fact I will not use some of the people who meet your standards … I will not use them because they have made such bad decisions."

Trump's response showed a misunderstanding of how secret services work, they do not take decisions or do manual work, they just offer their assessments of the situation so that political leaders can make the best informed decisions

After the CIA announced in December 2016 that Russia had intervened directly in the elections in hopes of accommodating Trump in the White House, the president did not dismiss him. However, the reporting instead attacked the CIA and said that these are the same people who claim that Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction.

In January 2017, Trump compared the intelligence services to Nazis after news leaked that they had informed him of potential Russian attempts to blackmail him [19659003] In March of this year forder Trump Coats and Michael Rogers, director of the National Security Agency, to publicly push back the investigation by then-FBI director James Comey of a possible coordination between Moscow and its president. Coats and Rogers were dissatisfied with the nature of the President's request and refused to comply with sources with knowledge of the situation, CNN said.

Coats against Trump over Moscow

In July 2018, maybe Trump stood next to Russian President Vladimir Putin and said publicly he doubted the US spies' assessment that Russia was trying to get into the To intervene and declared that Putin had subsequently

issued a statement reaffirming the conclusion that Moscow has actually worked to influence the election results. Shortly thereafter, as he stood on stage at a conference, the intelligence director was visibly surprised by the announcement that Trump wanted to invite Putin to Washington.

"It's going to be special," Coats joked, later apologizing and saying he did not mean to be disrespectful.

The worldwide hearing of threats in January, which was annually held by Congress, seemed to mark a turning point. The officials must sincerely respond under oath to matters that are unclassified and can be discussed in an open framework. Their answers highlighted the wide gap between the intelligence agencies' assessments and the President's statements on a number of national security issues.

Trump ripped off coats and other leaders in a series of tweets the next day, while his allies said secret service officials should not publicly broadcast ratings that differ from those of the president.

about ISIS, North Korea, Iran, etc., but if secret services do so publicly, they undermine the administration, "said Fred Fleitz, former National Security Council chief of staff, to Fox News.

Coats and CIA director Gina Haspel testified that Iran continues to abide by Trump's international nuclear treaty, adopted by Trump in May 2018, and warned the president that they are "extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran."

While Trump insisted Coats told Congress that "ISIS intends to resuscitate and continue to issue orders to thousands of fighters in Iraq and Syria.

Coats and his colleagues also highlighted the climate change implications that the President rejects, stressing the threat of Russian attempts to undermine US elections and democracy, an attitude the President undermined or opposed

This story has been updated.

CNN's Kevin Liptak, Sarah Westwood, Jim Sciutto, Evan Perez, Stephen Collinson, Ted Barrett, Dana Bash, Jeremy Diamond, and Joe Ruiz all contributed to this report. [1965] 19659041]
Source link