Home / US / Dem committees gain new powers to investigate Trump

Dem committees gain new powers to investigate Trump

On Tuesday, Parliament voted to issue new legal powers to an important committee investigating the Trump administration, and gave the Democrats another tool in their fight to dig deeper into Robert Mueller Robert (Bob) Swan Mueller ship to intervene Hearing series to Mueller report According to ship, the Intel panel will hold a series of hearings to the Mueller report. The Key House panel faces the crucial week for Trump MORE's [19659003] s report on Russia's interference in elections and possible obstruction by President Trump Donald John TrumpTop Armed Services Republican plots crowd on the 0B defense budget Amash leaves House Freedom Caucus after the impeachment practice Amash leaves House Freedom Caucus after the impeachment practice MORE .

The 229-191 The vote was severely crushed by party-political standards without defections from either party, highlighting the stalled divisions on Capitol Hill between Democrats accusing Trump of conducting a "bay r-up" referred to Muller's Results, and Republicans struggling to protect their White House allies from a view of their political "witch hunt" by 2020.

The resolution authorizes the House Judiciary Committee to seek compliance with the subpoena in federal court Attorney General William Barr William Pelham BarrAmash leaves House Freedom Caucus after Trump's impeachment tensions between Democrats, justice for a day cool tensions between Democrats , Justice for a cool day MORE who refused to publish some parts of Müller's report and the underlying documents; and Don McGhan, the former White House lawyer, who resisted a Democratic summons to appear before the committee.

Yet in a late debate, Justice President gets Jerrold Nadler Jerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerWatergate character John Dean Laughter for answers to GOP lawmakers The Hill's 12:30 report – Presented by MAPRx – Nadler breakthrough agreement with DOJ on Mueller documents Hill & # 39; s Nadler's 12:30 report presented by MAPRx receives breakthrough agreement with DOJ on Mueller documents MORE (DN.Y.) announced Monday that he An agreement has been signed with DOJ officials to gain access to "Müller's main files."

The surprising agreement on the eleventh hour has defused some of the long-lasting tensions between Democrats and the administration. At the same time, before the vote on Tuesday, the Democratic leaders welcomed the resolution as a necessary and aggressive extension of their constitutional powers of control, suggesting that they might never need it.

"The timing will depend in part on whether the DOJ continues to cooperate with our legitimate powers to monitor and investigate under Article I," said the Rep. Hakeem Jeffries Hakeem Sekou JeffriesSteyer Group, which The Congressional Congress Against Steering Democrats Against Steering Congress The Steyer Group, which is taking action against 12 Democratic Congressional members, is blocking Trump's call for help in the midst of new obstacles. MORE (DN.Y.), Chairman of the Democratic Caucus.

"If they continue to work with us, I would expect us not to run to the courthouse."

This complaint does not apply to McGahn. And the Democrats are proposing to use the new legal powers provided for in the Tuesday resolution to prosecute the former White House lawyer in the not too distant future.

"It seems to me that Mr. McGahn is in a particularly vulnerable situation, private citizen," Jeffries said. "He should either work immediately or face the consequences."

More Liberal Democrats Advocate Trump to Initiate Impeachment – A Measure Refused by the Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi Nancy PelosiFeehery: Pelosis Dangerous Impeachment Game Feehery: Pelosis Dangerous Impeachment Game Press: How "Nervous Nancy" Trump MORE (D-Calif.) And other top democrats trumped who have political concerns about taking such a drastic step without much public support.

"In my opinion, there is nothing more balancing in our country than impeachment," Pelosi said Tuesday during an event in Washington that featured a well-known refrain.

At least 56 Basic Legislators Seek Impeachment According to The Hill's footprint, Pelosi is increasingly under pressure to show that her preferred strategy of aggressive investigation is to produce results.

The language the Democrats used in describing Tuesday's resolution points to the readiness of the top democrats to give the scandal-stricken government a hard-line image, even if they decide against stricter legal measures.

Indeed, democratic leaders refer to the resolution as "civil contempt." But the measure does not mention contempt. And the language is much softer than any other resolution passed by the Judiciary Committee last month to keep Barr and McGahn in contempt of congress – a move that carries high sentences, including heavy fines and up to a year in jail becomes.

"We briefly call it contempt because the courts obviously need to despise the executive to give the orders to obey," the MP said. Jamie Raskin [19659024] Jamin (Jamie) Ben Raskin Overnight Health Care: Biden Upset Abortion Rights Groups with Attitude to Hyde Amendment | Trump increases restrictions on fetal tissue research | Democrats plan event to review Trump's mental health Overnight Health Care: Biden Upset Abortion Rights Groups with Attitude to Hyde Amendment | Trump increases restrictions on fetal tissue research | Democrats plan Trump House mental health review event Democrats plan Trump MORE mental health review event (D-Md.), Member of the Judiciary Committee and former constitutional professor.

"So it's generally not contempt."

There is some disagreement among the Democrats as to why they have not pursued the resolution on criminal contempt. Jeffries and Nadler both cited the DOJ's recent decision to release more Mueller files as a reason for the weakening of their position.

"We began yesterday to see that given the possibility of criminal contempt or inherent contempt, they suddenly began to see things differently," Jeffries said.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer Steny Hamilton HoyerHouse democrats are pulling laws that would lift legislators House democrats are pulling laws that would lift lawmakers This week: House democrats are escalating the fight for Mueller report MORE (D-Md .) Proposed The decision was based on more practical considerations and the unlikelyness of DOJ lawyers prosecuting the head of the agency.

"I understand that contempt is not contained in the resolution – it's essentially civil contempt – and … it authorizes the committee … to let the courts enforce the summons," Hoyer said Tuesday. "We think this is a far more productive way than pretending that a US lawyer appointed by Donald Trump will prosecute the Attorney General – his boss – for disregard."

Regardless, Democrats are still negotiating on the testimony of Mueller, who had hinted last month that he would prefer not to appear before Congress to discuss his findings. Nadler took the lead in these talks, but refused to provide information about her status.

The lengthy deadline has frustrated a growing number of legislators who want the Special Envoy to clarify a multitude of issues that still revolve around him, especially for not recommending that he be impeached for obstruction.

"That's the view of the vast majority of House Democrats," Jeffries said. "Bob Mueller is committed to the American people to bring these conclusions to light in a public testimony before the United States Congress."

Source link