Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and former Finance Minister P Chidambaram are not among the plaintiffs' signatories to the Supreme Judge of India, Dipak Misra. Congress leaders Ghulam Nabi Azad and Kapil Sibal rejected the suggestion that there was a "split" within Congress and that the opposition parties had no consensus on the issue. "Since the issue dealt with the Constitution, we deliberately did not consider Dr. Manmohan Singh because he is a former prime minister, and we did not want to embarrass her with respect to some others whose cases are developing," Sibal told reporters. The impeachment petition was condemned by the Bharatiya Janata Party, with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley accusing Congress and his friends of using the impeachment as a "political tool". He called the notification a "revenge petition" after Judge Loya's Supreme Court judgment "unmasked" the plot of falsehood.
Previously, the Supreme Court had sought the advice of the Attorney General (KK Venugopal) to prevent the media from publishing such "scandalous" stories against the judiciary.
Here are the ten key developments related to the impeachment of Congress and other opposition parties against CJI Dipak Misra:
. 2 Manmohan, Chidambaram has not signed an indictment of CJI : Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and former Finance Minister P Chidambaram are not among the signatories to the indictment of India's Chief Justice Dipak Misra.
This committee of inquiry will consist of three members: a Supreme Court Justice, a Supreme Court, and a major lawyer. The committee will bring charges and ask the judge to give a written answer.
The judge also has the right to hear witnesses. After the investigation, the committee will decide whether the indictment is valid or not and then submit its report.
If the investigative committee determines that the judge is not guilty, there are no further measures. If it finds him guilty, the parliament that made the motion can continue the motion.
The application will then be debated and the judge (or his representative) will have the right to represent his case. Thereafter, the proposal will be voted on. If two-thirds of the voters, and most of them the full strength of the parliament, are supported, it is considered passed. The process will then be repeated in the other house.
The judge's bench, which also includes Judge Ashok Bhushan, said, "Lawmakers should also follow rules."
Judges must act fearlessly, "the lawyer said, adding that politicians had spoken publicly about the issue and reported to the media on the impact on the functioning of the judiciary.The matter was heard in the court hours before the opposition MPs the indictment motioned against CJI Misra.
Sorabjee, attorney general during the NDA government led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee, made a devastating attack on the opposition's decision to bring the indictment against the CJI and say: "This is the worst thing of the independence of the judiciary can happen. "
He said Friday's event would shake the trust and confidence of the people in the judiciary.
Sorabjee's view was shared by Justice Dhingra, who said it's an attempt to gain political mileage.
8. Loya will not forget, there is hope, as millions can see Truth says Rahul : Congress President Rahul Gandhi said today that India makes judge BH Loya not forget and millions of Indians can see the truth , His remarks came when Congress and six other opposition parties filed an indictment of the Supreme Judge of India, one day after the Apex court rejected a request for an investigation into the death of Loya, who heard the allegedly fake case of Sohrabuddin Sheikh  "There is no hope, everything is fine," says Judge Loya's family. I want to tell them that there is hope. There is hope because millions of Indians can see the truth.
"India will not allow Judge Loya to be forgotten," he said on Twitter.
. 9 Charges against CJI Dipak Misra: A series of indictments has been filed against the Supreme Judge of India, Dipak Misra. 19659010] a) The first indictment relates to the conspiracy to pay illegal gratification by persons in connection with the case Prasad Education Trust and to the way the case was handled by the Chief Justice FIR references to the Chief Justice by allusion In these talks are obvious. The refusal of permits to the CBI to register an FIR against Judge Narayan Shukla of the Supreme Court of Allahabad when the CBI shared incriminating information with the Chief Justice was itself an act of misconduct.
b. The second indictment relates to the Supreme Judge having received a written petition, both administrative and legal, seeking to investigate the matter of the Prasad Education Trust, which he would probably also consider as part of the investigation.
c. The third charge is that the Chief Justice acquired land when he was a lawyer by making a sworn statement that turned out to be false. Despite the orders of the ADM, which canceled the allocation in 1985, the Supreme Judge did not surrender the land until 2012, when he was summoned to the Supreme Court.
d. The fifth indictment refers to the abuse of power by the Chief Justice in deciding to send sensitive matters to certain banks by abusing his authority as the master of the list with the likely intention of influencing the outcome.
With contributions from the agency
First published: Sat, 21. April 2018. 10:12 IST