قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Sports / ECQF Game # 1 Review: Toronto Maple Leafs 4 vs. Boston Bruins 1

ECQF Game # 1 Review: Toronto Maple Leafs 4 vs. Boston Bruins 1

  Toronto Maple Leafs defeated the Boston Bruins in Game 1 "title =" Toronto Maple Leafs defeated the Boston Bruins in Game 1[ads1] "/> 
<figcaption class= Photo: THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

About This Boston Sweep …

Your game in ten:

1. The first test the Leafs had to pass in this game was their start, knowing they were entering enemy territory – in a building full of evil memories – against a squad, who feels really good at home (the Bruins were 29-9-3 in TD Garden this season) The first 5-10 minutes were exactly as the Leafs wanted it – it did not happen much as the two teams did with 50-50 shifts and no lingering shift from layer to layer, letting the crowd out a little earlier and helping the Leafs establish themselves in their game.

The next test dealt with what would happen, w hen something went against the Leafs in the first round period – such as a William Nylander penalties leading to a penalty kdown and a Bruins power play goal were staged by Brad Marchand and Patrice Bergeron, similar to Game 1 in this series last Spring. The Leafs' immediate response was positive as they produced successive shift shifts initiated by the Auston Matthews line (19459014) and did not deviate from the game plan. When 90% of the audience watched, "Here it goes again", this was a leafy answer from the Leafs and a good sign that Game 1 would be a different story this time.

. 2 All eyes that fell into the night were how the Marchand / Bergeron / Pastrnak matchup would play for the Leafs at 5v5 and whether this time would be anything else. John Tavares and Mitch Marner answered this question quite emphatically tonight. Marner was the best player on the ice for both teams. He showed an outstanding performance of 200 feet (constant second and third attempt to defensively defeat), and of course he made it 1-1 in favor of Leafs goal followed by a 2-1 goal. Boston had no answer to Marner last spring, and it looks like they will not find one this year.

Tavares was in the conversation for best player on ice – he won 62% of his draws, including big wins against Patrice Bergeron for the 1-1 goal and a 4-1 goal in which he iced the game off his knees with an excellent performance. The Leafs won the matchup 5: 5 on the scorecard and in the ownership match. Every time this is the case in the marquee match, the leafs' odds increase with their depth advantage.

So much of each series comes to be the best players on this team's other, and this was a very encouraging start by Tavares, Marner and Matthews in this regard. That said, there is an amazing topline with a lot of pride on the other side of this series and a good start is just that – a start.

. 3 From the point of view of the Leafs, there could have been no better script than Nazem Kadri (19459013) and William Nylander (19459014). Both players had disappointing seasons, but had the opportunity to completely reverse the playoff script by taking advantage of some advantageous third-line match situations. The target immediately went to its feet; Nylander was engaged throughout and found another level in his game as he stopped on pucks and competed low in the offensive zone. Kadri, after a hard start for him and his line, began hurling the corpse, jerking his mouth and looking more like Kadri.

Making sure the split in Boston was big, but how they got it Equally noteworthy – they won the Bergeron matchup 5: 5, Frederik Andersen was absolutely solid, and they brought these two (Nylander and Kadri) into the series early on. The Coyle line brought it up early, but they turned it around, and if they can live on this series, the Leafs could exploit some misunderstanding with this couple.

. 4 Anyone who felt that this would be a straightforward series for Boston clearly stopped watching the playoffs after the Leafs lost last year (by the way, in seven after finishing third) and not seeing what Tampa Bay did with it Bruins Team Leaves are not Tampa Bay but now have a year more experience (Matthews, Nylander, Kapanen, Johnsson, Marner, Dermott etc), and with Tavares who have contributed They can boost the pace of the Bruins and create serious matchup challenges over four lines.

This game was played as the Leafs wished to play and they looked like the faster and deeper team at 5v5 – the neutral zone was fairly open, the Leafs were capable of the Bruins rushed into sales on the foredeck, and they constantly stressed Boston in transition play. Significant parts of the Bruins defense did not look as if they could handle the pace of the game in open-ice mode. The right-wing group of the Leafs, who played against Zdeno Chara in this series, seems to be a big mystery to Boston, as the Leafs are quite deliberately attacking the ice's side with flips and chips behind them.

That We'll see how the Bruins adapt and whether they can limit themselves more to the Neutral Zone in Game 2, as the Leafs will need that style of play for all series if they can. 5. We saw the first signs that Mike Babcock finds more comfort in what is available to him in the middle of the ice this time. There were some ways to move against the Bruins Bottom Six beats in Tavares or Matthews' line, but he usually ran it the way Boston wanted it for the first 40 minutes (the matchup Game changed significantly after the Bruins) shortened their bank to chase the game). He looks like he's going to let these matchups roll if he can, and keep the river up from his bench. It's a nice luxury to be able to say, "We are confident in what we have here, so as not to overdo it", and in a perfect world, the Leafs will be able to drive the other team into the ground for more than 60 minutes. Of course, the best plans are one thing, but game situations (persecution vs. leadership) determine everything at the end of the day.

6. Only 6:40 in the Ice Age at 5: 5, but it was a big game from the fourth series of the Leafs which several times helped tip over the ice and set up the Leafs' scoring lines for the next layer with some swing and / or an offensive attack on the offensive, providing the kind of down-low loops that made a serious one Question mark for the Leafs team that was included in the series. Connor Brown landed the first big hit of the first period and drove through the web and mixed it through (his best game for a long time); Trevor Moore grinded on the foredeck, keeping his feet in motion and withstanding countless abuses to prolong the cycles. While playing for less than seven minutes, the fourth line in the third period trusted four shifts (one more than the second and one less than the first).

7. 7. 7 The other calamity that the Leafs needed to weather came in the second hour, in about 5-10 minutes, during which the Bruins with successive strong O-Zone layers (the only time that really happens all night is) arrived on it. They needed a crossbar help for a Charlie Coyle chance and some big parades from Frederik Andersen but the Leafs resisted the wave and scored three hit points in the A attack – one ended with an insurance goal by Nylander before Rask a runaway for Tavares and a chance for Auston Matthews. If the Leafs can often chase Boston after the game in this series, by determining the pace of the games early and restricting their chances, they will have many chances to stave off the games by using Boston games. their blue line group has no overall very good recovery speed.

8. The defensive pair that ultimately pulled the most out of Bergeron was Muzzin-Zaitsev pair; The pairing of Rielly – Hainsey saw just a little more of Boston's topline than in their fourth line. The pair had some nice moments on the defensive – Muzzin made some important defensive games + first passes, and Zaitsev, while struggling to move the puck and occasionally make some games, also made some important defensive stoppages. Muzzin and Zaitsev finished the team's top of the scoring (66%).

In this game in Babcock, these two think that these two stop cycles are better than all the others on the blue line of Leafs (I agree with that in Muzzin's case), but there were definitely a few moments when the puck was moved out of its own zone, which were less trusting. It helped a lot to have the Leafs forward, providing adequate support and generating the attack zone time in the Tavares line. This will be an interesting situation to monitor.

9. A pair of defenses that need to gel quickly here is the Combo Gardiner – Dermott as there was a jump game for them with the puck, and they did not seem to be to be perfectly well or in sync with each other in time. This partly contributed to the struggles of the Kadri Line to start the game. Gardiner ended the night with a single shot on / ice for / 12 against and played only 16 minutes and changed. Undoubtedly, much of this is just a few games that have to return from serious injury. This is a pairing that has the potential to stop secondary matchups, but they have to come in and we need to see how Gardiner's Ice Age tracks from here, as this is an indication of how far from 100% he is in the Moment.

10. Frederik Andersen launched the Bruins series last year by giving up five of 40 shots in Game 1 and three of five shots in Game 2 (after that for Curtis McElhinney) , Another must for the Leafs of course was that Andersen had a good start in this series. He did just that and stopped everything that was required of him, beyond an unstoppable PP goal by Patrice Bergeron. His biggest sequences took place in this second period of Bruin's pressure, but he made consistent timely savings.

Gameplay: 5v5 Shot Attempts

src = "https://46wvda23y0nl13db2j3bl1yx-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019 /04/20182019-30121-cfdiff-5v5.png "alt =" Toronto Maple Leafs vs. Boston Bruins, Game 1 [19659038] Highlights of the Game

After the Game: Mike Babcock

Source link