Warren's goal was to take the theme of her legacy out to nervous democrats and show that she was willing, willing, and able to face President Donald Trump if and when the time came for her to accept the The problem is that if you sweep away all the glamor of your well-produced video, you stick with it: there is still no assurance that Warren, in any meaningful way, is an Indian.
Yes, Stanford geneticist Carlos Bustamante tells Warren in the video that "the facts indicate that you absolutely have an Native American in your family tree." But the estimates of how much Indian blood Warren actually has range from 1/64 to a whopping 1/1024. What, uh, is not much.
Trump himself picked up on this uncertainty in a series of tweets (of course) on Tuesday morning.
(This claim is untrue based on facts available.) There is no evidence that Warren was Employed by Harvard Law School – or elsewhere – for claiming minority status for her Indian heritage.
That's Trump's deed, of course regardless of the facts: If Warren had made a DNA test that confirms that she is ha Do you think that Trump simply granted the Native Americans the point and moved on? Of course not! He would almost certainly have sent a similar tweet to one Tuesday, claiming – without evidence – that the DNA test was "wrong."
So, if Warren thought this video and DNA test would close Trump up, she was dangerously wrong. But I suspect neither Warren nor their campaign team thought so. Because they are not hopelessly naive.
My strong impression is that the whole presentation of the facts on Monday was not aimed at Trump, but at Democratic activists and donors, who probably voiced Warren some nervousness about how to use the entire "Pocahontas" attack could come against them from Trump 2020. Remember that every political party will fight the last elections in the next election. And in the last elections, the Democrats lost what they thought was a safe cause because they nominated someone in Hillary Clinton who had enough political baggage to fill a wagon. Trump took advantage of Clinton's luggage, often calling her unknowing, who was close to an uncontrolled criminal.
Against this background, Warren tries to fully explain her own claims about the Native American heritage – and the fact that she was not originally there when she spoke about what she said about Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania in 2012 Minority status, it is a problem for some Democrats. And this concern will be harnessed by Warren's later opponents of the Democrats as they try to raise doubts among the voters as to whether the Massachusetts senator is the right person to take on Trump.
What Warren was trying to do Video and DNA test then shows fellow Democrats that she was ready to strike back and had the firepower to refute all of Trump's attacks. A good idea – in theory! In practice, however, it works less well. Because Warren is unable to give an answer to her Indian background, which seems to completely and completely pass the smell test.
Before her big rollout on Monday, we knew she'd told people she was part of the Native American because her mother and her mother's family had told her that. Now we have a geneticist who says "the facts imply that she has some Native Americans and the estimates of how much Indian blood Warren actually roams around wildly – and could be as small as 1/1024.
That is no certainty.Not closed.And the uncertainty remains something that can and will be exploited – by Trump publicly and by their likely Democratic opponents in subdued conversations with keywers and party activists.
This fact means that Warren's strategy has become a blow and a failure leads 19659016]