قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / Extinction rebellion: High Court decides that the London protest ban is unlawful

Extinction rebellion: High Court decides that the London protest ban is unlawful



  Protests against Extinction Rebellion at Oxford Circus

Image Rights
Nathan Williams / BBC News

A police ban on protests against Extinction rebellion in London last month was illegal Under the Public Order Law, the police imposed a ban that prevented the participation of two or more people in the group in protests.

However, the judges have ruled that the police are not authorized to do so because the law does not foresee "separate assemblies".

Activists claim the police could now be charged by "potentially hundreds" of demonstrators for improper imprisonment.

The Met said she would "scrutinize" the verdict.

The protests cost £ 24 million for the police and were reported According to Met, 1

,828 people were arrested and 165 people charged with crimes.

During the trial, the military had argued that the ban was the only way to fight the widespread disruption.

Lord Justice Dingemans and Mr. Justice Chamberlain, however, pronounced their verdict in favor of the Extinction Rebellion.

Lord Justice Dingemans said: "Separate assemblies, separated by time and distance, are not a public gathering within the meaning of the law.

" XR [Extinction Rebellion] The Autumn Uprising, October 14-19 Therefore, the decision to impose the condition was unlawful because there was no power to impose it under the law. "[19659005] The judges pointed out that there are powers within this law that can lawfully be used to" control future protests that purposely serve to "push police resources to the limit."

Image Rights
Getty Images

Caption

Green P Arty Peer Jenny Jones (center) was among those who brought the successful legal challenge to court

During the 10-day protests against climate change last month, activists have closed areas around Parliament and the Bank of England and targeted London City Airport.

The police had previously warned the demonstrators to continue demonstrations in Trafalgar Square, or the risk of arrest – prior to issuing a city-wide ban on October 14, pursuant to Section 14 of the Public Order Law.

The court was told that the ban was issued on the same day as a message posted online by London activists.

Protesters using the "be water" tactics used by demonstrators in Hong Kong.

"Be water, crowds divide into fast-moving groups and couples who connect via phones," it said.

"In particular, they gather in large numbers until the police react and move you to a new location."

The ban was lifted four days later, and officers said it was no longer necessary since the demonstrations were ended.

Analysis

BB C Internal Affairs Correspondent Daniel Sandford

This was a radical tactic that was passed by the Metropolitan Police on October 14 and which saw all future protests against the Extinction Rebellion for several days in London banned.

But she failed. No police likes it when their actions are labeled as "unlawful."

Today's decision of the High Court deprives officials of the possibility to ban future protests citywide, meaning that demonstrators want to be "like water" – where they divide up into fast-moving groups – it will be difficult to control if they try to disturb a whole city.

So the police have to deal with what lies ahead.

If a particular protest gets out of hand at a particular location, they can close it, but it must be a decision made by a local official and not by someone who sits in a police station and worries about possible protests the next day.

In response to Wednesday's decision, Extinction Rebellion UK tweeted: "We will not be silenced." The decision was considered "historic" and criticized by ministers who voted in favor of the ban.

  • Celebrities admit the "hypocrisy" of climate change.
  • Festival atmosphere as demonstrators fill the streets The ban was "reasonable and proportionate" and "not taken lightly".

    He added that the police "can not ban and prohibit protests" and that it was specifically decided whether officials could arrest demonstrators for assembly in Central London.

    "There is no criticism from me of the decision to impose the condition that was met with good intentions and was based on the circumstances the commanding team encountered at that time," he said.

    "It has indeed led to a reduction in disruption, but in this case it becomes clear that monitoring demonstrations like this within the existing legal framework can be challenging."

    What Does Extinction Rebellion Mean?

    image credits
    Getty Images

    The legal victory of Extinction Rebellion follows two weeks of protests in Britain last month.

    The group (XR for short) wants governments to declare a "climate and ecological emergency" and take immediate action to tackle climate change.

    It describes itself as an international "non-group" violent civil disobedience activist movement. "

    Organizers launched in 2018 say they have groups ready to take action in dozens of countries

    For the full article click here.


Source link