قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Face recognition technology: The California legislature wants to ban them in police cameras

Face recognition technology: The California legislature wants to ban them in police cameras



The program falsely identified 26 lawmakers as criminals, the ACLU said.

The ACLU announced the results of its test as it pushed for the passing of a law banning technology for police cameras.

"This experiment reinforces" the fact that face recognition software is not ready for primetime – let alone for use in body cameras worn by law enforcement agencies, "said Assembly Member Phil Ting, whose photograph is a counterpart to a prime minister In the Declaration of the ACLU.

Facial recognition systems have gained popularity in recent years and are used at airports, schools, at home and even at concerts.The technology can also help a bartender find out who is next People are identified by videos and photos, and their facial features compared to those in a database.

However, the ACLU is concerned because the technology is biased and inaccurate, especially among women and people of color

Together with the ACLU, Ting AB 1

215, also b Recognized as The Body Camera Accountability Act, co-sponsored. The bill prohibits the use of face recognition and any biometric monitoring system in body cameras worn by the police. There are currently no cities in California with this technology in their police cameras, Ting said at a news conference on Tuesday.

"I saw innocent Californians exposed to constant police rendition for mismatches," Ting said. "We can not permit that."

More than half of the misaligned legislators were colored according to ACLU. Last year, the organization conducted a similar test that wrongly identified 28 members of Congress. In these results, they found that the program was more inaccurate with women and people of color.
  The legislations, which were provided with a false flag. One refused to have his picture published.

"Face-recognizable police body cameras would be a disaster for communities and their civil rights, regardless of the accuracy of the technology," he told Matt Cagle, lawyer for technology and civil liberties, ACLU in Northern California ,

"Even if this technology were accurate, which is not the case, face-tracking cameras would be a source of massive damage to California's civil rights."

Others say that technology is a "necessary tool"

Some law enforcement agencies disagree, claiming that the bill would compromise officials' ability. During a hearing of the Senate Public Security Committee in June, the Riverside Sheriffs & # 39; Association said the technology would help attract events that attract a large crowd like the Coachella Music and Arts Festival and the Rose Bowl to provide the best available security.

"By banning this technology, California will tell the nation and the world that it does not want our law enforcement officers to have the necessary tools to adequately protect the public and participants in these events," the association statement said the sheriffs.

John Beverly Hills Mayor John Mirisch reiterates these feelings in a letter he wrote to Ting in June expressing his opposition. He said the technology will help manage events that attract high-profile entertainers such as The Golden Globes.

"This technology allows law enforcement agencies to compare images of hundreds of thousands of people, saving time and agency resources." Writes Mirisch.

Other States Have Prohibited It

If passed, California will be the largest state banning face recognition technologies in body cameras worn by the police. New Hampshire and Oregon both passed laws in 2017 to ban the practice.
This year, San Francisco, for a long time one of the world's most technically-friendly and tech-savvy cities, and Oakland, California, banned the use of technology by police and other government agencies.
  Beyond San Francisco, more cities refuse face recognition

Axon, the police make Los Angeles police Angeles also announced this year that facial recognition systems will not be added to these devices.

AB 1215 was first introduced in February and approved by the California Assembly in May. According to ACLU to be voted on in the coming weeks in the California Senate.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story has misclassified the timetable for approval of the bill. The article has been updated to state that the Bill was approved by the California Assembly in May.

Rachel Metz of CNN contributed to this report.


Source link