Why now? President Trump's campaign this month posted ads that made false statements about Democratic candidate Joe Biden. Biden's campaign urged media and digital platforms to stop advertising. CNN then took down, but Facebook kept it upright.
- Then Senator Elizabeth Warren provoked Facebook with a deliberately misleading Facebook ad claiming the company had backed Trump – before admitting that this was a trick to uncover flaws in Facebook policy. Facebook has also maintained this ad.
- In the meantime, Senator Kamala Harris has requested on Twitter that Trump's account be given the impetus for the repeated attacks by the President on the Ukrainian whistleblower, among others.
The Big Picture: Online forums have always stood in front of the door fighting for "where are you pulling the line." But now that the game Troll vs. Moderator is being played on the stage of national politics, neither Facebook nor Twitter wants to play at all. Your solution: to work out some special rights for politicians.
What the Poles can not say on Facebook ads or postings:
- You can not give details about the voting process incorrectly, such as when there is a choice, the rules or the way how is chosen.
- As Trump's campaign found out, her ads must not contain swear words.
- You can not embed social media posts tagged by a fact checker.
- Although they are not bound by factual standards, they must adhere to Facebook's other community standards, such as hate speech.
Between the lines: It gets even more messy as politicians can accept an already debunked claim and repeat it in their own ads. Meanwhile, a normal user can not accept false claims from a politician's ad and repeat the same words without violating the Facebook rules. However, they are free to share the ad of this politician.
Twitter defines a class of "world-leading" users who are or represent a government / elected official, who are candidates for public office, or candidates for a government position, "and that too have more than 100,000 followers and are verified.
- Theoretically, world leaders should obey the rules that apply to all others, which would not threaten violence, promote terrorism, target harassment, or harass people Race, religion, sexuality, or a particular gender mean rules based on the "timeliness" of their comments.
- The Company reserves the right to restrict the promotion of such tweets and to clearly state that the content is in violation of Twitter's rules This step, however, has never been done since in June the directive was announced.
Conclusion: The rules of each platform have their own peculiarities. But both divide their users into two groups – and give one of them a fundamentally greater freedom to violate ethical and social norms in their contributions and not to be punished.
The Outliers: Google Ownership According to YouTube, the guidelines are not based on the speakers, but on the content.
- "Anyone who uploads videos to YouTube is subject to our policies, including politicians," said YouTube spokesman Farshad Shadloo.