Has an internal Facebook memo been leaked that aims to justify the social network's strategy of growing at any cost? Or just an opportunity to open the debate on difficult questions about new technologies?
The extremely blunt memo of a high-ranking executive director who leaked this week and was quickly rejected by the author and Facebook warned the social network's goal of connecting the Internet. The world could have negative consequences, but these have come from the positive side outweighed.
"It may cost a lifetime to expose someone to perpetration," states top executive director Andrew "Boz" Bosworth in a memorandum of 2016. "Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack geared to our tools. "
While Bosworth and Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg said the memo was only one way to provoke a debate, it created a new social storm for the social network that is in the controversy surrounding the kidnapping
David Carroll, professor of media design at New School Parsons, tweeted that the memo highlighted a "ruthless hubritious attitude." From the world's largest social network.
"What's so striking is that a leader has this conversation on a Facebook wall, "said Jennifer Grygiel, a professor at the University of Syracuse, who studies social networking." He showed a schlec high level of judgment and bad business communication skills. This speaks for the culture of Facebook. "
Grygiel said such issues require" thoughtful discussions "and should take place in the context of protecting users." When these companies build new products and services, their job is to eliminate the risks to evaluate and not only to know but also to ensure public safety. "
Bosworth, who is considered part of the inner circle of CEO Zuckerberg, wrote:" The Ugly The truth is that we believe in it, people so deeply that everything that connects us more people is "de facto" good. "
On Thursday he said he just wanted to open a discussion and added," I do I do not agree with the post today and I do not agree with her when I wrote it.
Zuckerberg replied that he and many others on Facebook "did not agree with the points raised."
Outsourcing Ethical Issues
Jim Malazita, Professor of Science and Technology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute , said it's not surprising to see the memo in an industry whose work culture is heavily subdivided.
Malazita said the memo outlines the discussion with the assumption that technology and connecting people are always positive.
"The assumptions built into these frames are already ending a series of talks," he said.
added Malazi In addition, most people learning computer science are encouraged to make these technologies work as well as possible while "outsourcing" the issue of moral responsibility.
"It does matter to them, but even if they impact on the social impact, there is a limit to how much they practice this care."
Joshua Benton, director of the Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard University , said it was too easy to hold Facebook responsible for abusing the platform
"I'm rarely able to defend Faceboo," he said, but the view that technology is worth spreading although some people would use them for horrible purposes, "one might have believed the telegraph, the phone, the e-mail, sms, the iPhone, etc.," said Benton Tweeted
Doing The Right One
Patrick Lin, director of the Ethics and Emerging Sciences group at California Polytechnic State University, said he sees "no evidence that the Facebook culture is unethical, even though only one of the senior executives can be in the right place the Brun poison you.
"I suspect that most Facebook employees want to do the right thing and are increasingly uncomfortable with how the proverbial sausage is made," Lin added.
Copies Facebook's internal reactions to the The Verge website showed that many employees were upset or upset about the Bosworth memo, but some defended the executive.
Others said the leaks may indicate that Facebook is being attacked by spies or "bad actors" Emba upsets the company.