قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Fact Check: White House Vs. Mueller report, a week outside

Fact Check: White House Vs. Mueller report, a week outside



Since summing up Attorney Bill Barr's report, President Donald Trump has claimed that the report says there is "no hindrance" – he has continued to assert this claim since the publication of the edited report.

At a tirade on the Mueller report, Trump on Thursday tweeted that the end result of the report was "No Collusion, No Obstruction. Amazing!"

First Facts: Trump is wrong in constipation, but correct in collusion.

The report clearly states, "While this report does not exclude that the President has committed a crime, he does not relieve it" on issues of disability. Mueller also writes that "we did not draw definitive conclusions about the President's conduct" and were unable to pass judgment on the issue of disability.

Trump agrees, however, that the report found no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. While the report did not establish "collusion" between Trump's representatives or the campaign and Russia's intervention in the 201

6 elections, Mueller wrote that campaign members knew they would benefit from illegal Russian action to influence the election, and that they did not take any criminal steps to help Russia intervene in the campaign.

Firing Muller

During the same Tweet Storm Trump attacked reports "from the fake news media," claiming that he had never told the then White House lawyer, Don McGahn To shoot Robert Mueller.

Facts first: The report confirms that McGahn was asked to get Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein is to fire Mueller

In several Interviews with McGahn and others said in the report, after a message with the news that Trump had given McGahn orders to shoot Muller, "the President wanted … McGahn to deny that he had been instructed to remove the Special Counsel McGahn declined the order and "insisted that his memory of the President's order to remove the Special Counsel was correct," the report said.

Later, in a conversation with McGahn, Trump said, "I did I said the word "fire"? "McGahn replied," What you said is, "Call Rod, tell Rod that Müller has conflicts and can not be the Special Adviser." Trump replied he had not e said "fire" and just wanted McGahn to direct Rosenstein's attention to the perceived problem and leave it to the report.

McGahn understood, however, that Trump said, "Call Rod, there are conflicts, and Müller must go," the report said.

Trump Tower Meeting

During a press conference, White House Advisor Kellyanne Conway was asked about the famous 2016 Trump Tower meeting. She said that the first testimony of Donald Trump Jr. was correct after the meeting's reports and that Trump Jr. had received "complete relief from it" through the Mueller report.

CNN's Jim Acosta asked Conway, "Why did we originally tell a false story that the meeting was Russian adoption?" Conway disapproved of the characterization of Acosta, pointing out that the Trump Jr. statement said that the meeting was "mainly" about Russian adoptions.

First Facts: The presumption that Trump Jr.'s first statement on the meeting was confirmed was confirmed by the Mueller report is false.

In Trump Jr.'s statement to the New York Times in July 2017, Donald Jr. described the meeting primarily as an adoption program. The statement was not about whether the presidential campaign was discussed.

However, the Mueller report describes how Trump Jr. was promised "" official documents and information that would burden Hillary and her dealings with Russia "as" part of Russia and his government's support for Mr. Trump. " Replying to this offer, Trump Jr. wrote back, "If that's what you say, I love it." The meeting was then scheduled.

According to the report, when the Russian lawyer, with whom Trump Jr. and his staff met at the Trump Tower, could not provide any incriminating information about Clinton, the conversation turned to the Magnitsky Act, which sanctioned several top Russian officials , In response to these sections, Russia has banned all adoptions from Russia to the US.

The assumption that the meeting was "primarily" about Russian adoptions is completely misleading. In the report of Mueller it is said that the reason for the interest of the Trump government at the meeting was the promised "dirt" on Clinton. The claim also ignores the discussion of the Magnitsky Act documented in the report.

Testimony to Mueller

Trump tweeted on Monday that "the people closest to me, who knew the campaign better than anyone else, had never been asked to testify before Mueller . "
Facts First: Several top election officials were interviewed by Muller's team.

Mueller and his team interviewed Hope Hicks, Sarah Sanders, both Campaign's top campaign officials, along with campaign leader Corey Lewandowski, campaign leader Paul Manafort, campaign chairperson Steve Bannon, and campaign head Law, Jared Kushner.

Facebook Ads from Russia

At the Time 100 summit Tuesday, Kushner claimed that Russia had bought "some" or "a pair" during its efforts in the 2016 US presidential election. from advertising on Facebook.

First Facts: Russia's efforts to disrupt the presidential 2016 election on social media amounted to more than "a few" Facebook ads.

The Internet Research Agency, a group backed by the Russian government, "bought over 3,500 ads and spent around $ 100,000," the report said, citing Facebook.

The Internet Research Agency promoted Facebook based groups with these ads. The agency's sites on these pages, according to the report, reached between 29 million and 126 million US persons. While the impact of these efforts on the 2016 elections is under discussion, Kushner's characterization as an agency buying "a few Facebook ads" is wrong.


Source link