قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / Food stalls: The most important moments of the first day of the public hearings on impeachment

Food stalls: The most important moments of the first day of the public hearings on impeachment



I'm watching the eagerly anticipated and highly controversial listening. Below my thoughts on the biggest moments so far.

Adam Schiff's opening statement, Chairman of the Intelligence Committee, had a very clear message: these hearings are not just about Trump. It is about how the Presidency works (and should work) in our democracy – and about the balance between the legislative and executive organs that are incorporated into the Constitution.

"Our answer to these questions will not only affect the future. Www.mjfriendship.de/de/index.php?op…01&Itemid=37 […] of this presidency, but of the future of the presidency itself and of which Conduct or misconduct the American people is to be expected from its commander-in-chief, "Schiff said at one point.

Elsewhere, he cited the Trumps The government's refusal to allow its high-ranking officials to testify before Congress, Schiff said, was not what the founders intended. "

Finally, Schiff asked, "Is that what the Americans should expect from their president now? If this is not an incontestable behavior, what is it? Must the oath of office itself ̵

1; that our laws are faithful? Our President has stated that he is defending a constitution that balances the forces of his branches and sets ambition against ambition, so that we do not become a monarchy. V3.espacenet.com/textdoc? – still have meaning? "Founders twice and the constitution three times – these hearings should be expressed less as a partisan effort against Trump than as a necessary defense of the democratic principles upon which the country was founded.

This is not about Trump or even a specific one Political party, said Schiff, this is about how our government should work – and not.

Schiff's appeal to the story is unlikely to affect many people in the committee, even before he started speaking, the Republicans had Sign behind the podium set to criticize the proceedings.

Devin Nunes turns it to 11

When ship tried to substantiate the hearings in the story, Californian MP Devin Nunes, who said High-ranking Republicans on the intelligence committee wanted to take the Gonzo route.

He called the hearings an "erb "Discard rmliches finals for democratic experiments, the results of the elections of the 2016th

He described the testimony given by Ukraine that there is a "cult-like atmosphere".

He suggested that the whistleblower "is known to have a bias against President Trump".

He mocked the "impeachment fraud".

He described the process as a "star chamber".

He dismissed the investigation as a "cheap Ukrainian continuation" investigation of the Mueller investigation.

Nowhere I could say that Nunes actually addressed the July 25th protocol between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Or the facts presented by the witnesses requested by the investigators of the House of Representatives.

Bill Taylor's opening statement is a Wow

– full of details about the formation of an "irregular" channel (led by personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani) with Ukraine, often directly against his own regular Kanal and the long-standing US policy in the region.

Taylor also presented a highly specific timeline for his interactions, including with National Security Advisor John Bolton, US Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, and senior Ukrainian officials. On this timetable, he repeatedly made it clear that there is little agreement that US military aid for Ukraine will be held back, unless the country announced an investigation against Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas company owned by Hunter Biden The son of the former vice president sat on the board.

Most astonishingly, Taylor recounted an episode of which he had only learned about Sondland after his closed testimony of September 22. According to Taylor, Sondland met on July 26 with a top adjutant for Zelensky – one day after the fateful call between Trump and Zelensky. Sondland then called Trump and informed him of the nature of the meeting, and a Taylor aide heard Trump ask about "the investigation." After this call, Taylor adviser Sondland asked what Trump's thoughts about Ukraine were. Sondland responded that Trump cares more about the Biden investigation than anything else.

What, wow.

The Geopolitical Implications of Trump's Approach to Ukraine

During the center of the hearing on Wednesday – by at least Congressmen – that did Trump (and his allies) regarding Ukraine and the Bidens. Both Taylor and George Kent, a State Department official, have repeatedly expressed their concern about the impact of restraining military aid on the country.

Taylor noted that he had traveled to the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine and had directly seen the impact of nearly $ 400 million of American military aid on the country in the current fight against Russian raids. Kent also tried to stress how critical Ukraine – and America's support for Ukraine – was in continuing efforts to curtail Russia's progress in the region. (Russia annexed Crimea, a Ukrainian territory in 2014.)

Taylor and Kent expressed their sincere concern that the White House-organized pressure campaign had real implications for these longtime diplomats. Not only for Ukraine but also for the interests of the United States States in the region – and especially for their relations with Russia.

In short, it was not just about getting Trump out of Ukraine, what he wanted from the Bidens. This had a real impact on American geopolitics.


Source link