Though Apple argued in its court battles that Qualcomm patents were no longer worth unlike those The company praised them privately by companies such as Ericsson and Huawei – and wanted to sue Qualcomm in 2014, according to new documents.
"Technically speaking, they were" The Best, "said Johny Srouji, senior vice president of hardware, in a March 201
Apple did not choose Qualcomm Sue until the end of 2016, when Qualcomm spent billions under its exclusive partnership, continued to post and a third June 2016 Apple document was referred to as the Qualcomm Royalty Reduction. One section specifically states: "Goal: Reducing Apple's Net License to Qualcomm."
The strategy was to "financially violate Qualcomm" and "the L Qualcomm licensing model, "the document said. Apple did not initiate its first lawsuit against Qualcomm until January 2017, which claims that Qualcomm not only owes $ 1 billion in license rebates, but also applies abusive practices that force chip buyers to sign patent licensing agreements. References by Ericsson and Huawei were created on Tuesday during the first and only day of the lawsuit against Apple against Qualcomm. Cordell's argument was that a group of patents twice the size of Qualcomm's Apple had a fraction of what Qualcomm had requested. However, Qualcomm lawyers claimed that Apple's internal documents revealed that the iPhone maker purposely licensed other, less-expensive patents to make Qualcomm look overbearing.
The idea was to "selectively filter" a group of patent licenses that would serve as "evidence" comparable in dispute with others, "the paper notes.
According to opening statements, the process ended abruptly, and The two companies announced that they would settle any outstanding litigation, Apple will pay an unknown amount to Qualcomm and enter into a new licensing agreement, and UBS analysts speculate that the former could be $ 6 billion and the latter nearly $ 9 per iPhone  The Post report might suggest this Apple not only decided to install 5G modems in 2020 iPhones, but because it could not succeed with clear evidence, it wanted to reduce royalty.