قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / From redesigning her engagement ring to a $ 3 million remake: how Meghan Markle's unique taste continues to revolutionize royal life

From redesigning her engagement ring to a $ 3 million remake: how Meghan Markle's unique taste continues to revolutionize royal life

From the second in which Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made their love story public in 2016, there was not a single facet of royal life that the American did not have modernized one way or another.

From her proudly progressive politics to her groundbreaking wedding ceremony, her approach to raising a royal baby, to her routine disregard of outdated royal protocols and conventions – hell, even her very existence as Duchess of Sussex Meghan has proven that she is a thoroughly modern woman who is ready and willing to revolutionize royal life at any cost.

But not only does she bring her progressive ideals to the table. With a past life as an actress in the lead role in the American drama Suits when she met Harry, she also brings a unique flavor to the party she has won from her days with red carpets and industrial functions, wrapped in designer goods.

The first indication that Meghan's taste was beyond the traditionally firm attitude of the royal family came from her wardrobe. Their flawless selection has not only led to a phenomenon known as "Markle Sparkle". In the days after the Duchess wears a piece of a particular fashion designer, the demand for designers or brands will typically increase by 200 percent over the course of the week, but they've also proven she's not afraid to take risks (like the awesome semi-transparent couture dress worn by Ralph & Russo on her and Harry's engagement photos) and paid a nice dime for it.

Take, for example, her enviable maternity wardrobe while she was pregnant with the little Archie Harrison . According to Love the Sales, the total cost of each Meghan ensemble in the months leading up to their maternity leave came to nearly $ 700,000, along with a tailored Oscar de la Renta gown worn at the Australian Geographic Society Awards Gala last October was the most expensive piece in her coterie. According to the Daily Mail, the dress covered with black birds costs more than $ 1


  Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex

Paul Edwards – Pool / Getty Images

Meghan's wardrobe has cost many times more than her new sister-in-law, Kate Middleton – seven times more, Love the Sales said. Meghan has a well-established background before [marrying] Harry, a passionate designer clothing designer, told MarieClaire.com Liam Solomon the fashion designer of Love the Sales in March: "Walking on red carpets Living in glamor. " LA Lifestyle, the former actress already wore brands like Dior and Givenchy. One might argue that her new fame in the royal family has only improved her style choices, which would obviously mean bigger budgets. "

" On the contrary, Kate grew up, meaning she stayed with more conservative brands "As Meghan wore Stella McCartney & Victoria Beckham during her pregnancy, Kate favored pregnancy brands like Seraphine, which were much cheaper."

During pregnancy, Meghan tasted exquisite – and she was ready to spend whatever was needed to satisfy her – but she was not just seen in her closet. In the days and weeks prior to Archie's birth, we learned that Meghan jumped across the pond in February to celebrate a glamorous A-list bridal shower in the Big Apple. planned by bestie Serena Williams to whom she flew with a rented private jet that allegedly cost $ 125,000 return flight, and in early April there was the luxury baby moon with Prince Harry in five-star The Heckfield Place in Hampshire (just 45 minutes from home) reportedly cost $ 43,000.

Of course, all of them had faded compared to the project she carried out at her planned residence, Frogmore Cottage. We knew that the Sussexes were planning their own course at the Windsor House, which Queen Elizabeth II gave as a gift. It took four months – from November 2018 until the following March – to update the home for the Duke and Duchess. As we learned last week, life as a new parent began there, and it took quite a few taxpayers' money

According to the recent annual report from The Sovereign Grant and Sovereign Grant Reserve, upgrades to Frogmore Cottage cost 2.4 million Pounds (over 3 million dollars) in taxpayer money. "The property has not been under construction for some years and has already been earmarked for renovation as part of our responsibility to preserve the condition of the occupied royal palace", Sir Michael Stevens of which is Keeper of the Privy Purse and responsible for the accounts of the monarchy, said. The Sovereign Grant covered the works undertaken to transform the building into the official residence and residence of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their new family, the building was relocated to a single residence and the outdated infrastructure replaced of course, to ensure the long-term future of the property. "

Of course, work on the historic house was not just because of the special sensitivity of Meghan and Prince Harry. It was also a necessity. According to the report, the funds were used to reconfigure and completely renovate five units in "poor condition" – turning them into an official home. According to a royal source, the work involved replacing defective wooden floor beams and beams, updating obsolete and inefficient heating systems, rewiring electrical wiring, and installing new gas and water pipelines as part of the expensive bill. "Essentially all furnishings were paid by their royal highnesses," Stevens said with a source that clarified to people "Curtains, furnishings – everything that gets paid separately is paid privately." According to a royal source, a supplement will be provided to finance a new kitchen, a new bathroom and other facilities. However, if higher quality is desired, the additional amount must be paid privately. However, these sums and details were not stated in the official report.

And although apparently Meghan and Harry are not yet done with updating their house, in May it became known that almost all Frogmore Cottage applications need updating. The exterior had recently been approved – it should also be noted that it hardly are the only royal couple that has made such expenses. And when you compare Harry's older brother Prince William and his wife Kate, they seem downright frugal. As it turned out in 2014, Duke and Duchess of Cambridge raised more than $ 5 million in taxpayer money when renovating their current home at Kensington Palace, turning offices into a stand-alone apartment. Heating, hot and cold running water Removal of asbestos and a "simple refurbishment", so People . They also used their own funds for a new kitchen and interior.

In the last few days we also learned that Meghan had her engagement ring specially designed for her by Prince Harry himself and contained two diamonds from his deceased mother Princess Diana collection, updated as her husband's anniversary gift. It was not until the fans compared close-ups of the Duchess' hand that the original gold band, upon which the three diamonds had been placed, had been replaced by a thinner micro-pavé with a line of smaller inlaid diamonds deep in the band.

Of course, it was a decision that was not well received by at least one so-called "royal expert," such as Majesty Magazine Ingrid Ingrid Seward who has been covering the royal family since the 1980s and has written over 20 books on the subject, The Sun said this week that she could not understand the thought process behind the jewelery update.

"I find it odd that Meghan wants to change a ring that her husband designed specifically for her," she said. "A royal engagement ring is a piece of history and not a piece of jewelry that needs updating if it looks old-fashioned."

What historians like Seward do not seem to understand at this point is that they are the ones who seem to be a bit strange when it comes to her reactions to the Duchess of Sussex. Because if they do not realize at this point that she's determined to update all facets of a rather old-fashioned royal life while still worshiping the story behind them – well, that's up to them.

var fbstarttime = new date (); ! Function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s) { if (f.fbq) Return; n = f.fbq = function () { n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply (n, arguments): n.queue.push (arguments) }; if (! f._fbq) f._fbq = n; n.push = n; n.loaded =! 0; n.version = & # 39; 2.0 & # 39 ;; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async =! 0; t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (s) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s); } (Window, document, & # 39; script & # 39 ;, & # 39; https: //connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');

fbq (& # 39; init & # 39 ;, & # 39; 1611373942516879 & # 39;); fbq (& # 39; track & # 39 ;, & # 39; PageView & # 39;);

var fbendtime = new Date ();
Source link