Jeanne Louise Calment lived 122 years and 164 days, the oldest detectable age ever. Her interviews revealed a portrait of the centenarian in high spirits: "I've only ever had one wrinkle and I'm sitting on it," she told reporters when she turned 110. Calment died in 1997 in Arles, France, where she spent much of her impressively long life. No one has lived, according to accurate records, more than 120 years.
Whether there is a limit to the human lifespan is an age old question. An actuary named Benjamin Gompertz suggested in 1825 that the mortality rate increases exponentially with age. Under the so-called Gompertz Act, the probability of dying every eight years is doubled. This seems to be the rule for people between the ages of 30 and 80 years.
But the researchers do not agree on what happens to mortality rates very late in life. A new study, published Thursday in the journal Science, reveals that the Grim Reaper suddenly goes off the gas
"The goal was to create a controversy over whether human mortality would be the same as mortality in many other species has to solve, "said study author Kenneth W. Wachter, emeritus professor of demographics and statistics at the University of California at Berkeley. It has been found that mortality rates in laboratory animals, such as Mediterranean fruit flies and nematode worms, are weakening. "We think we settled it," he said.
Accelerate mortality rates to the age of 80, slow it down and then plateau between ages 105 to 110, the study's authors concluded. The Gompertz law ends in a flat line in this view.
To be very clear, we're talking about accelerating mortality rates, not chances themselves. They're still not good. Only 2 out of 100,000 women live to 110; For men, the chances of becoming a supercutenarian are 2 to 1,000,000. At the age of 105, according to the new study, the chances of surviving until your 106th birthday are 50 percent in the stadium. It's another 50-50 turn to 107, then back to 108, 109 and 110.
Under the direction of Elisabetta Barbi at the University of La Sapienza in Rome and experts from the Italian National Institute of Statistics, all were born in Italy between 1896 and 1910, who lived to 105 or over. The data included 3,836 individuals, of which 3,373 were women and 463 were men. The National Italian Register, which requires annual updates from citizens, provides more accurate information than US Social Security data. "Italy probably has the best data we have," Wachter said.
Statistician Holger Routen of Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden called the study a "very careful and good analysis" that had a mortality plateau between 105 and 110
Using similar longevity data from Japan and Western countries , which were collected by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rozenzen rejected the study published in December in the journal Extreme a hard line for human life in research. He predicted that in the next quarter century, someone would be 128 years old.
Two years ago, researchers at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Nature based on data from 40 countries for longevity argued that the limit was around 115, the Washington Post reported. In her view, Calment's lifetime was a stroke of luck.
Brandon Milholland, who worked as a PhD student on the Nature study, said it was "highly unlikely" that the mortality curves weakened. So suddenly and flatly.
"There are more than these two options," said Milholland on Wednesday. In a statement, his co-author Jan Vijg, a geneticist at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, described the choice between a sharp plateau or the Gompertz law as a "false dichotomy."
"Your error bars are big," said Milholland This leaves room for steeper turns through the Italian data. He agreed that the Gompertz Act should end, as mortality rates could not double more than 100 percent. But this study has not convinced him that the mortality rate does not continue to rise at about 50 percent.
Rozenzen denied the conclusions of the Nature newspaper, which estimated a lifetime limit, and said the authors had made a statistical mistake: Yes, the chances of living beyond 115 are low, but that does not mean one Boundary exists, he said. He used the example of throwing darts on a dartboard. In 10 throws, you will not get a Bull's Eye. Throw thousands of darts at a dartboard and maybe you will.
"You simply do not understand this problem if you make more attempts" – more darts on the dart board or more people who are very old – "then the record higher, "said Routzen.
The numbers of very old grow. In Italy, for example, four people born in 1896 lived to age 105 or older. More than 600 people born in 1910 lived so long. Between 1896 and 1910, child mortality was reduced in Italy, Wachter said. In later decades, the care of 80- and 90-year-olds also improved as more people were added to the centenarians.
"If we understand the interactions between our genomic heritage and all these other well-studied practical factors, such as diet and behavior, why will humans be able to make and advance this progress in the '80s and' 90s?" , he said.
So far, the oldest among us have come from all walks of life. "The lifestyle recommendations – you train, you eat this or that – these are quite effective at a young age, but do not seem to matter in older years," said Rozenzen.
Calment said she smoked two cigarettes a day. She was 119 years old and did not come out of the habit until she could not see well enough to kindle.
How Space Exploration Can Help Treat Earth's Old Age
Calm down, scientists have not discovered a 512-year-old shark. (It's probably like 400, tops.)
As you get older, grief literally starts to make you sick