قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Sports / Goodell: Helmet should serve for protection, not a weapon

Goodell: Helmet should serve for protection, not a weapon




One day after the NFL extended the Helm Hit Rule, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell decided which league hopes would help make the game safer.

"Our focus is on how we take the head out of the game and make sure we use the helmet for protection, and it's not used as a weapon, and that's the core of what we're focusing on, and I think so "We have made tremendous progress this week," said Goodell at the conclusion of the annual Orlando meeting on Wednesday.

Following the announcement of the rule, many current and former players have changed the problem, worried about how it could change football. Goododell said that the next phase of the process is to educate players and coaches on what will be a penalty in motion.


"Everyone is excited and supports this," Goodell said, noting that coaches were involved in the decision change the rule. "We understand that the players are still, they have not seen all the data we have yet, and they have not seen exactly how we're going to approach it, but I'm confident in the months to come." "We'll do it, you'll understand, and our game will be much better."

Under the extended rule, abusive players would be punished for lowering their heads and using the crowns of their helmets to initiate contact with an opponent each time they play. A 15-yard penalty is imposed and players can be disqualified depending on the severity of the hit. Goododell said that Replay is used to determine if a player should be eliminated from the game.

"I think it was [Patriots] Coach [Bill] Belichick who built it first, but if we can repeat it If there's one of those fouls that we think should be removed from the game, and that also confirms that someone should be ejected, I believe that there is much more trust among the coaches, that it is done consistently and fairly, "he said. "And I think it also gives officials more confidence to make those judgments because they know that there will be some kind of video input, in fact, I think that the coaches, the clubs and our officials are doing this collectively feel." It's the first time we use Replay for security, and I think that's a positive thing. As [Competition Committee Chairman] Rich [McKay] said, this is the first time we've used Replay in terms of any such thing as a foul, but we think that this is warranted for security-related issues.

The commissioner added that the league is still deciding which types of helmets justify ejection compared to a 15-yard penalty.

"That's exactly what we're doing in the coming weeks We have been working a lot on it, but now let's go back and look at what a standard it is when it comes to disqualifying a player to a fine, suspension or other alternative from there. That's the work we're going to do, and that's the work we do to train our clubs individually with the clubs in May and June.

Further notes from Roger Goodell's press conference at the NFL Annual General Meeting:

On Property Talks Concerning National Anthem Policy:


"The real The focus of the meeting on social justice passed away, which we unanimously did, the last piece of our program that we had worked out with the Players' Coalition, which was to create a platform to address the issues that the players had addressed "and I believe so 'We've come together in a unique program to help players and work between teams and players to address these community issues.' Www.mjfriendship.de/de/index.php?op…37&Itemid=32 There has been some discussion about the anthem, but only in the context of "Is this the platform to help players address these issues in their lives? To address communities and ensure that we are in a better place?

For safety Eric Reid is still not contracted:

"The 32 teams make their individual decisions about the players, of which they believe that they will best help their franchise. These are decisions they have to make. They do that every day. They do so with the best interest in winning and setting the best franchises. And they will make those decisions. I'm not directly involved.

About the progress of the sale of the Carolina Panthers:

"The sales process is progressing. I talked to Jerry (Richardson) and the leadership team about this process. It moves with unprecedented interest and we are excited about it. And I would expect that they will eventually come to a conclusion, so that has the potential and the hope is that we can vote as a league in May.

Possible changes to the Rooney Rule after Raiders situation:


"I consider it broader. I think we need to keep looking at our efforts in this area, because I think it's not just about the Rooney rule, our efforts were never just about the Rooney rule. I think it's an important element. This has a fundamental aspect. But I think it is much more comprehensive than that in the sense that we are creating the opportunities and how we are doing everything we can to help educate people and give them the experience to advance their careers. And with an enormous focus on diversity so we have the best people at the highest levels of the league. And that is a central value of who we are and what we do. I think that will come in different forms beyond the Rooney Rule. Let's look at the Rooney rule and see if we can improve that? Absolute. Will we look at some of the training methods to give those trainers, GMs and officials and all other aspects of our operation better opportunities to expand their roles and move to another level? That's what we're doing very well, and I think we'll look at it all.

On the attitude of the NFL regarding a possible Supreme Court ruling that could legalize sports betting:

"Well, I do not know, I have no insight into what the Supreme Court will do. We are not initiated. I think what we did this week was to make sure that people understand what I call perspectives and ways gambling can change, partly because of the Supreme Court decision, and how it develops beyond that. And that is not new work. For some years, we have focused on how this affects our way of working. Number one, repeatedly confirmed by our membership, was the integrity of our game. We need to make sure that no matter what kind of environment we work in – some of which may be in line with what the Supreme Court decides, some of which are future legislation – we need to make sure that we work in an environment where We can protect this integrity of our game. We acknowledge that we are in an environment where we do not know what the Supreme Court is going to do, and we do not know how other issues are resolved, but we wanted to make sure that our clubs understand everything we do, to make sure that we are prepared for it. "


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *