The Republican legislator beat the electoral security bill passed Wednesday in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives on a so-called "garbage heap" and said it violated freedom of speech.
The proposed legislation would require the detection of illegal campaigns, offers campaign assistance from foreign governments, and would limit campaign-related communication between candidates and foreign governments. It would also require more transparency in social media ads such as Facebook and Twitter.
"Today, spokespersons [Nancy] agree with Pelosi and House Democrats to pass the First Amendment and suppress the freedom of speech," said Ben Sasse of Nebraska. "This bill is [a] a heap of hot waste that gives the federal bureaucrats the power to decide what political speech is and what is not political speech, and then demands that records be kept on who says what."
"This bill is so blatantly un-American that it has managed to unite constitutionally conservative and ACLU [American Civil Liberties Union] liberals", he added.
The ACLU said in a statement that the bill "has found the wrong balance, swept too far and more language than necessary to achieve its legitimate goals" to prevent foreign interference in US elections.
GOP LAWMAKER'S STORM-IMPEACHMENT-SESSION AS SHIP IS RUNNING 227 to 1
Leaders of the GOP see the legislation as unnecessarily restrictive for campaigns. The White House threatened to delete the bill before the vote because it was superfluous, comprehensive and unenforceable. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he would be dead on his arrival in the Senate.
Kevin McCarthy, Chairman of the House Minority, R-Ca. He said that the House Democrats' bill would not protect against outside interference and would also "dangerously expand the control of the federal government over the freedom of speech of the Americans."
"The vague wording of the legislation would potentially give Washington the unprecedented responsibility of determining what may be considered" legitimate "news or who may be considered a" legitimate "journalist," McCarthy said.
"This Partisan The bill, for which Republican votes have not been cast, is unlikely to see the light of day in the Senate, but reminiscent of the Democrats' efforts to suppress competing speeches," he added.
The bill was introduced during the summer, highlighting the investigation by former Special Representative Robert Mueller into Russia's involvement in the presidential elections of 2016. The investigation established political ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, but found no conspiracy between the two Parliament's approval of the bill follows the expulsion of Democrats against President Trump who is accused of not providing military assistance to Ukraine unless he examines his son, former Vice President and hopeful President Joe Biden Hunter, and their business in the country.
CLICK HERE TO OBTAIN THE FOX NEWS APP
The Electoral Security Act is the third law passed by the Democrat-led House in connection with problems arising from the presidential elections of 2016.
] In March, Parliament approved a bill designed to facilitate voter registration, tighten voting security and encourage presidential candidates to disclose their tax returns. The Senate still has to vote on the bill.
In June, Parliament approved a draft bill for paper votes for federal elections and granted $ 775 million to help states secure their electoral system. However, the Senate Republicans vetoed this and other laws on electoral security this week, and showed no sign that they were stopping their efforts to block Democratic laws.
The Republicans said Wednesday's bill would be a federal election and could cost billions of dollars. McConnell declined to present a stand-alone bill on electoral security, but said he would support efforts to send $ 250 million to election security funds to states to strengthen their electoral system before the 2020 election.
The Associated The press has contributed to this report.