New York Times columnist Brett Stephens, a college professor who was targeted for an insulting tweet, delivers a statement Tuesday evening accusing his email of being "abuse of his power."
"Bret Stephens is in the status hierarchy above me, he knows that, I know that, he won a Pulitzer Prize and a regular column in the New York Times, I'm just a professor, I was surprised to see one Received email from Bret Stephens last night: "Dave Karpf, Associate Professor of George Washington University, began publishing his article in Esquire.
Karpf had some fun on Monday at the expense of Stephens when he proposed that the bedbugs had hit the Times newsroom. Last weekend there was a "metaphor" and Stephens personally took enough time to give him as well as the GWU-Provost to write an e-mail. TWITTER JAB [1
"It means he has not seriously tried the online It means he's been trying to send a message, that he's above me in the status hierarchy, and that people like me are not supposed to write bad jokes about people like him online, it was an exercise to exercise power – using the New York Times imprimaturist to ward off a speech he found uncomfortable. "
The Associate Professor proposed Stephens' appearance on MSNBC, where he suggested being called a "bed bug". is a tactic that goes back to "totalitarian regimes".
NEW YORK TIMES NEWSROOM-HIT WITH BROKER INFESTATION: REPORT
Giggle. However, equating a random Twitter account with a totalitarian regime is a remarkably long path, "Karpf responded.
He went on to say that Stephens was hypocritical because he repeatedly denounced" safe rooms "and published an article entitled" Freedom of Speech and the need for discomfort, "Karpf added" discomfort to you, but not to me, it seems … "
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
" Bret Stephens seems to think that his social status should make him immune to criticism from people like me. I think that rewarding his social status comes with an understanding that lesser-known people say something about him online, "Karpf continued. He assumed that my university would punish me for having provoked the wrath of a writer at The New York Times. This is an abuse of his social station. It did not cost me anything, but it is a misuse of its power that would be a real punishment for a younger or less privileged academic.
"The Times should expect more from its writers. Stephens should expect more from himself. Nobody has more freedom of speech than a public intellectual with a regular column in the file. Stephens is free to say what he wants. With this freedom comes the discomfort that people disagree with you. If Stephens wants to have this social power, he must learn to handle it more responsibly. "