What if, suddenly, decades of progress in weather prediction The great on life, property and the economy would be enormous. Yet the government's science agencies say it's a loss in forecast accuracy could happen if the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S.
Both the FCC and the wireless industry are looking to deploy 5G technology, which will deliver 100 times faster than today's mobile networks.
The FCC and the Government's Science Agencies, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA,
Both sides agree that American advancement and leadership in 5G is critical, but talks break down when it comes to the technology
Last week, Neil Jacobs, the acting head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said Congress that 5G interference could set the accuracy of weather forecast back 40 years.
Yet on Tuesday, CTIA, the trade group representing the US wireless communications industry, unleashed a scathing rebuttal of the Jacobs' assertion.
"It's an absurd claim with no science behind it," wrote Brad Gillen, CTIA's executive vice president, in a blog post.
Gillen maintained that the NOAA claims that it is "never going into use" (The study, a collaborative effort between NOAA, NASA and the FCC, still under deliberation, is not public
The Never-Used Sensor was released on 2010.
Jordan Gerth, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, called CTIA's blog post both "misleading" and "misinformed." n
These microwave sensors, Gerth wrote in an email, transmit important water vapor data at 23.8 gigahertz, where they are potentially vulnerable to interference. In March, the FCC auctioned off the 24 gigahertz band.
The proximity of the two bands could expose the water vapor to un-band emissions. Gerth said "it is undisputed"
In an email, CTIA countered that the newer sensors are "
But, in reviewing the House Science Committee on May 16, Jacobs Told Members of Congress that the interference could result in a 30 percent reduction in forecast accuracy. "If you look back in time to see our forecast, what about 30 percent less than what is today, it's somewhere around 1980," he said.
With this reduced forecast skill, the European model would not have Predicted 2012's Superstorm Sandy hitting the Northeast coast several days in advance, Jacobs said. Instead, the model would have steered the storm out to sea.
Jacobs added that if the data loss from 2 percent, NOAA would likely have to "stop working" on its $ 11 billion polar-orbiting satellite program, important
Gillen wrote NOAA's predictions about 5G interference "are wrong on the merits, on the facts, and on the process," but both NASA and the Department of Defense support [noun]
"[T] he assessments that NASA has done in connection with NOAA have determined that … there is a very high probability data, "NASA's administrator, Jim Bridenstine, told the House Science Committee.
In March, the Navy wrote a memo stating the data interference would lead to" a probable degradation of weather and oc
The United States of America's Democratic Republic and Democratic Republic of the United States of America (1965) ] "NASA took us to the moon, and NOAA helped us explore the depths of the ocean," said Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) In a statement to The Washington Post. Frank D. Lucas (R-Okla.) "We should listen." , the top Republican on the House Science Committee, struck a similar chord. "
" There is only one frequency we can use to observe water vapor in the atmosphere and to averaged out in areas where it could interfere with our predictions, "Heather Vaughan said. a spokeswoman for Lucas.
A major meeting of the world's spectrum regulators is set for this case, which limits on out-of-band emissions will be negotiated. The State Department is currently trying to build a consensus. position between NOAA and NASA on one side and the FCC on the other. All indications are that the sides remain far apart.