قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / Here are the most common reasons why Republicans defend Trump against impeachment

Here are the most common reasons why Republicans defend Trump against impeachment



Here's a look at the most common GOP defense mechanisms, why the president should not be subject to impeachment investigations, and the facts about those arguments.

One line the Republicans have repeated is that there was no return in Trump's call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. This despite the fact that Trump says in the rough transcript of the call, "I want you to do us a favor," after Zelensky mentioned his desire to buy more spear missiles from the US.
Among the topics of conversation that the White House addressed to the Republicans in response to criticism of Trump's call to Zelensky, there was no compensation that was inadvertently forwarded to the White House Democrats.
Within hours of the White House When the minutes were published, some Senate Republicans used the "no quid pro quo" line. "I've read the minutes in full, it shows that there was no return," Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley told CNN.
"It shows no return," said Republican Senator from Pennsylvania, Pat Toomey Politico.
The following day, Ohio MP Jim Jordan repeated this point to NPR's All Things Considered and said, "If you read the transcript, there is nothing there … there was no return." 1
9659004] In the last two weeks, MP Mark Meadows has tweeted several times that the idea of ​​a return is ridiculous. "It's ridiculous for some to try to turn that part of the call into" quid pro quo "- to put it mildly," he wrote on September 25 .

Some experts have noted that because the US is the most powerful ally of Ukraine, and much of the country's security ahead of Russia depends on support from the US. All the demands of President Trump are under some pressure.

The question of consideration is a contentious point for many Democrats to sue the President, as there is no doubt that Trump has asked a foreign government to investigate a political opponent during a legislature.

Just hours before announcing a formal impeachment investigation, House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi told the Atlantic Festival, "There's no need for the conversation to be rewarded."

He's just investigating corruption

Republicans also tend to argue that Trump is simply trying to expose corruption by asking other countries to investigate the Bidens Trump talks about … things, they both do to eliminate corruption and drain the swamp. "On October 4, Senator Ron Johnson told reporters that Trump" is worried about corruption "and that he" says what President Trump says at par.

Given Trump's statements and actions in the past, there is reason to suspect that this has nothing to do with politics and his only motivation is to eliminate corruption.
  Fact Review: Why Trump's Sudden fixation on the investigation of corruption does not add up

In the transcript In his telephone conversation with Zelensky, Trump never mentions "corruption" and focuses only on conspiracy theories around the DNC server, a US cyber security firm and the Biden.There is no evidence that could support one of the theories mentioned by Trump.

Trump has also defended his former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and expressed his condolences to him for years and pro-Putin) former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich has worked.

Manafort is currently in jail for tax fraud.

The whistleblower only had second-hand knowledge of the call between Trump and Zelensky.

Rep. Kevin McCarthy tweeted on September 29 that one of the key facts was that "the whistleblower was not on the call."
Sen. Lindsey Graham told CBS that the whistleblower complaint was "only hearsay," arguing that "the whistleblower did not hear the phone call," then the complaint was "a hoax."
The Inspector General of Intelligence, Michael Atkinson, exposed this The assumption that the allegations against Trump were all based on hearsay, wrote in a letter dated September 30, that the whistleblower had "direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct," and this information helped the IG considerably to make a "credible" decision.
  Intelligence Watchdog Debuts Whistleblower Conspiracy by Trump and other Republicans

the notion that the lawsuit against Trump is based on hearsay. "They are thinking about what the Democrats are up to," Jordan said October 8. "They are suing the President of the United States 13 months before a vote based on an anonymous whistleblower with no first-hand knowledge that has a bias against the president."

The law on reporting maladministration in the intelligence community does not prohibit persons with second-hand information from registering. In fact, the Inspector General has 14 days to investigate complaints about pressing concerns. Within these 14 days, the IG needs to find first hand information to determine if the urgent concerns are "credible" and forward them to the chain of command. [19659004] No matter that Trump has already released the main document of appeal: the call to Zelensky. And according to Mark Zaid, the lawyer representing the first whistleblower, a second whistleblower has provided first-hand information about some of the allegations in the original complaint.

It was a joke

Another The defense of the president, which the Republicans have continued to strive for, is that the media take him too seriously. In other words, he was joking. This defense was used in particular to direct Trump's request to China to investigate the bidens. There is no evidence that Trump joked, and Trump never said so.

Yet, this is the argument that Jordan and the Florida Senator, Marco Rubio, have made in recent days.

"I do not think it's a real request," Rubio said October 4. "I think he did it to reach you, I think he did it to provoke you, me and you He's playing it like a violin and all of that is not a real request. "
Jim Jordan agreed and said Sunday," I think Senator Rubio said that a few days ago. I think he gets the press to think about it.
CNN Trump has also reported that in June he had discussed Biden and Elizabeth Warren in a telephone conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping and told Xi that he would remain silent about the protests in Hong Kong as the trade talks progressed Addressing the Whistleblower

One of the main tactics that Republicans have applied in the defense of Trump is the attack on House Intel Adam Schiff, chairman of the espionage division.

"Ship did not even tell us that He met with the whistleblower before he filed the complaint, "Jordan said Tuesday in defense of the Trump administration, which prevented EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland from testifying before the congress.
During ship in an interview on MSNBC in September mistakenly stated that his committee was not dealing with the whistleblower prior to filing the complaint It was also wrong to say that the ship itself had met with the whistleblower.

Contact the whistleblower before the complaint is submitted, and advise them to contact the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. Although Schiff was generally aware of the whistleblower's concerns, there are no indications that he had met with the whistleblower.


Source link