No matter what you think of James Franklin, you need to tell him the following: If he asks a big question about the state of college football or the Big Ten conference, he will not mind. He does not hesitate to express it.
I've always liked the Penn State coach, even though I disagree with his answers.
That's how it was on Friday's Big Ten media days, when longtime Illinois reporter Bob Asmussen asked a number of coaches a brief question:
"The Big Ten have been eliminated by [College Football Playoff] in the last two years. What's happening? "
Jim Harbaugh apparently did not feel like responding, so he did not, it's fun to interview him, you really do not know how he'll answer any question at any point, this time perhaps because the However, Franklin, after chuckling over the "very straightforward" nature of the champagne sports author's query, put down a few factors that he believes to be the cause of his surprise.
they are at work in the B1
- • The B1G East Division beats each other.
- • Nine conference games increase the likelihood of loss.
- • No one knows how to play the system when it is so subjective to a constantly changing committee.
Franklin's Answer b egann with this foreword:
"We [the B1G] occur at a very high level. But of course, I think if you leave the playoffs for two years in a row, there must be discussions, and there are discussions, and I think we have to look at it all.
Consider this as our own discussion. My answer begins as follows:
The Big Ten are not as good as the Southeastern Conference. Nobody is as good as the Southeastern Conference. It dominates the college football playoff for a reason. And whatever it does not do, it is Clemson and, to a lesser extent, Oklahoma.
To repeat, the best of the SEC, ACC and Big 12 are often better than the best in the Big Ten. It is not about unbalanced divisions. It's not about plan strengths. It's not about the committee. The best teams in the country's southern league – Clemson, Georgia, Alabama and Oklahoma – were simply better than any other in the north (Big Ten) or west (Pac-12). And that will continue for a number of reasons that were discussed recently at this point.
- READ MORE: James Franklin of Penn State at the Big Ten Media Days: The Challenge to Achieve the Elite Status, the Big Ten's Playoff Fights, Position Deficits, More
But if we just want to rest here for a bar debate, I'm ready for it too. We follow Franklin's points:
1. The first reason why the PSU coach had no Big Ten teams in the CFP in the last two years was that the East was too competitive and he could never get away enough to justify a selection:
"We look at what the divisions look like, how the divisions are split right now. I think the East is very strong and very strong for a couple of years, and I think you can argue about the story, of course, there is high and low tide. But if you look east, it's pretty strong. Probably similar in many ways to the SEC West.
"Well, I think we have to have a discussion at least. That does not necessarily mean that we need to make changes, but we need to have a discussion. Regardless of whether the B1G East is really that much better than the B1G West, anyone recognizing this theory recognizes the opportunities the Ohio State has been in the CFP over the last two years.
destroyed by router losses in Purdue and Iowa. The Michigan's was subtracted from Iowa in 2016? The state of Michigan can not beat the northwest, no matter what year. And that the CFP appearance in 2015 was almost denied by a defeat in Nebraska?
Should we also discuss that it has made the Big Ten in the two previous CFP appearances – both from representatives of the East Division (Michigan State in 2015, Ohio State in 2016), they were chosen by Alabama and Clemson beaten by the combined score of 69-0?
Just because Franklin's teams are 3-12 against these three Eastern Powers does not mean that If we compare the difficulty of navigating between the B1G East and the SEC West, how is it that Alabama seems to make it so often? ?
2. Then of course it has to be the schedule, right? Franklin's Friday quote on the planning:
"I think the nine conference games are something to discuss. If you play nine conference games, you will have more losses in your conference. The math obviously tells you that. "
I've never been a fan of the nine conference games, not that I think an extra Big Ten game should be an obstacle to a CFP mooring, but if the B1G returned to eight league games tomorrow, that would be Franklin continued
"Obviously, we have now made some changes to some philosophies that deal with 1-AA games, FCS opponents, and similar things."
Yes, 2016 has the Big Required Ten Members are planning no further FCS opponents than those who have already signed a contract, and in 2017 the caveat was added that league members who had only four home games could use one FCS opponent to complete their home games. 19659002] The assumption here, however, is that the B1G schools have played the main role, unlike the schools of the South with their flimsy non-conventions in which they ni the house Just leave the bowling cones of the Sun Belt and the Conference USA or, worse yet, string FCS games together.
Except, that was not the case Among the already mentioned top 4 players were those who had 12 of the last 16 CFP moorings and eight places in the last four championship games.
Alabama has been planning multi-year top 25 residents in the USC, Florida State, and Louisville seasons for the past three years, the latter two who were suddenly hit by potholes, and the former, who temporarily had quarterback instability.
- READ MORE: Scenes from Penn State's First Day at the Big Ten Media Days
home-home with Ohio State, a neutral showdown with Houston, a road trip to Tennessee, and UCLA and Army last year.
Georgia debuted in 2017 in Notre Dame and North Carolina for a neutral appearance this year and has recently joined sigs Clemson plays in South Carolina each year, went to Texas A & M last year and met Auburn and the year before Year 2015 on Notre Dame.
These schools do not exist Temple and Pitt are among the big challenges in September. Under Franklin, Penn State has not played a single non-con opponent in its first five seasons. And it will not be this year either.
Franklin summarized his point of view: "I think all these things have to be discussed after the last two years and what happened, because I obviously think that many people in this room are like that. The participants of our conference feel like that we have the opportunity to compete with everyone anytime, anywhere. We want to have the opportunity.
"The hard part I think of is the criteria you've been told, the ability to play the playoffs, to control the strength on schedule, and similar things. There are many variables. There are many things you can not control. "
Yes, I think the above data shows that the teams that should have played in the College Football Playoffs were on some criteria.
. 3 Franklin ended up with his only valid point in my opinion – the continued membership of the CFP Selection Committee. Its members serve short, multi-year terms, similar to the NCAA basketball tournament selection committee. More recently, it has been talked about that each committee treats the mentioned criteria differently:
"The people who are in this room are different each year. I think we have to control the things we can control and the things we know as constants. And these are the discussions we need to hold as a conference.
When it comes to trying to play the system in an attempt to remedy the absence of the Big Ten at the College Football Playoffs, they will be in a circle.
Talking is cheap. Schedules and departments do not matter. The league is respected only when it earns on the pitch. At the moment it is not there. For very good reasons.