Today we say "Hey, Jones!" The weekly staples during the football season. Every Wednesday I'm going to get a few questions from the mailbox that are mostly about Penn State and Big Ten football, but maybe one week on a different topic – maybe PSU / B1G tires as we approach November, maybe something in relation to a recent column.
With Idaho and Week 1 Under Control …
This, from Michael Grego:
Will James Franklin live or die against the former doctor?
You have the command backwards, but we give you a passport. Terrible soon to answer, because Dr. Scott Lynch v. PSU, James Franklin, Sandy Barbour and other lawsuits filed were filed with the Dauphin County Court on Monday morning.
But on the basis of what I could For reading here the best guess on some aspects of the case:
First of all, it is difficult to determine the viability of this suit. Although Lynch claims Franklin has "repeatedly and repeatedly attempted to intervene in autonomous authority to determine medical management and make decisions to resume the game in relation to student athletes," he does not cite any examples nor names of names. It is possible that his lawyer Steve Marino has ammunition he hides ̵
It is unlikely that this lawsuit came out of the blue. It is common for a claim to be threatened before it is filed, as the filing itself is a negotiating ground for a possible settlement. This is probably a second step between Lynch and PSU. The process will most likely drag on at least during this football season.
At this time, a case often becomes a game of chess between lawyers. PSU and all defendants will raise preliminary objections to reject the lawsuit. Supplements may be submitted so they can take time to take this step. Then Lynch's lawyer could file an amended complaint. It's all a bit like a possession on the goal line, where both sides line up and then take a break to change the game and the defense, depending on what they see.
What you can count on, I believe is Penn State, which settles this out of court when it sees a chance that the lawsuit will go to a discovery phase. If this is a legitimate case, Franklin and PSU, as a last testimony, want players to be sent to play before they should have been sent.
This, by Bruce Snyder:
Do you think if the SEC had to play in Big Ten in November, would they be in the playoff mix every year? The weather is a good balance.
Yes, I do. If anything, the brand of the ball they play is very well suited to cold weather.
I mean, think about it: SEC teams often do not use outstanding thrower quarterbacks (keep in mind that all the food merchants Nick Saban has hired at QB do not matter) on Bama – Jake Coker, Greg McElroy , John Parker Wilson, zzzz ).
But SEC clubs are great in the trenches and they produce by far the nastiest D-lines in the country. All these things mean cold-efficiency.
Do not confuse this assumption with what I believe to be your tangency point: Georgia, Alabama, and the State of Louisiana do not need to enter cold weather outposts like Ohio, Michigan State, and Penn State (Purdue, Iowa, Wisconsin, etc.). ), in which a surprise is more plausible.
I also disagree that so many SEC teams never leave their backyards in September and basically never play outside the US South. In the past five seasons, less than half of the SEC schools have crossed the Mason Dixon line for street games: Georgia (@Notre Dame & # 39; 17), Vanderbilt (@Notre Dame & # 39; ; 18), Arkansas (@ Colorado State & # 39; 18), Mississippi (@California & # 39; 17), Missouri (@Purdue & # 39; @Connecticut & # 17;) and Louisiana State (@ Syracuse & # 39; 15). That's pretty lame.
This, from Charlie Tocci:
Do you see that anything is happening towards an expanded college football playoff?
Coming soon, I'm scared. The current contract, which started in 2014, has a term of 12 years and we are already almost in the middle. As you know, Disney owns the current deal. You and all other networks and organizations (Netflix, YouTube, we do not even know there is anyone?) Want the parameters to be set before they start negotiating and make a new offer by about 2024 6- or 8-team playoffs, it makes sense that the proof is provided until about 2023.
But there's still plenty of time left. Although you could abort and re-run the current agreement at any time, this is a lot of work if negotiations on a new long-term agreement take only four out of five years. Why bother?
Although I think there is a future for a single network or mix of broadcasters in an extended playoff, there is no incentive to do so over the next four years.  From Chris Fried:
Will Franklin retire after the season when the USC job is finally open?
Clay Helton has to be canned before all is German. I happen to think he has a good chance of having a season in which to survive – which is likely to be at least a Pac-12 title and a Rose Bowl appearance. Leach / Kingsbury disciple Graham Harrell is his new OC, who installs the hyper-vertical offensive "Air Raid," which became popular with Texas Tech a decade ago. Of course, that suits the Trojans, of course, since they have so many deadly weapons in their receiving stacks. Throw it long and let the greyhounds run under it. That said, I can not quite forget that I asked Franklin directly last November 24 hours if he would return as a Penn State coach in 2019 and he did not answer. He "corrected" himself the next day, but he knew what I was asking and he would not just say, "Yes, I will." Obviously, Helton would have had to do bad enough for USC AD to fire Lynn Swann and Penn State would have to do well enough for Swann to sell Franklin to the USC fan base. Meanwhile, Swann's future at the USC, with a new university president appointed earlier this year, is certainly not set in stone. But I have always thought that USC and Franklin fit together perfectly for all the 10 reasons I set out in this part last year. Apart from point 6, I think that's all true.