قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / House condemns the boycott of Israel for liberal objections

House condemns the boycott of Israel for liberal objections







  Ted Deutch "title =" Ted Deutch "/> </source></source></source></source></picture>
            </div><figcaption>
<p>
                " BDS does not seek social justice. It seeks a world in which the state of Israel does not exist, "said Rep. Ted Deutch on Tuesday. Luis Magana / AP Photo </p>
</figcaption></figure>
</p></div>
<p>  On Tuesday, parliament passed a resolution condemning a worldwide boycott movement against Israel the objections of some progressives claiming that the measure violates their initial revision rights. </p>
<p>  The controversial resolution passed by the House in a vote of 398-17 <b> </b>  with five present legislators comes after a struggle between moderate and liberal Democrats The scenes to publicly condemn the thrust, boycott, divestiture and sanctions movement, or BDS. </p><div><script async src=

History Below

The vote had the potential to uncover an ideological divide within the Caucus, even after the unification the Democrats against the racist tweets of President Donald Trump brought forth advanced opponents tv These are convention women from minorities.

"BDS does not seek social justice. It seeks a world in which the state of Israel does not exist, "said MP Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) On Tuesday.

There is a chance for Congress to stand up and point out that supporting a movement that does not envisage a two-state solution and delegitimizing the state of Israel is not something that promotes peace and should be called upon to find out what it is, "said Deutch later in an interview.

Moderates were promised that the resolution would get a vote on the house floor before the break in August. And some, like Democratic MPs Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Stephanie Murphy of Florida, privately threatened to rebel and sign a firing petition to enforce a more binding version if the Democratic leaders did not do so.

However, some liberal legislators – including high profile Progressives such as MEP Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) – have vigorously protested against the resolution, stating that Parliament voted to condemn a non-violent movement.

"We should strongly condemn violence that perpetuates the occupation, whether immortalized by Israel, Hamas or individuals. But if we condemn forcible means to resist the occupation, we can not condemn non-violent means, "Omar said at a hearing last week's resolution.

Omar, who was reprimanded by her colleagues for anti-Semitic remarks this spring, was immediately confronted by the militant GOP MP Lee Zeldin of New York, who accused her of "holding Israel responsible for all the violence she did has done.

The Minnesota Democrat introduced her own legislation to "reaffirm that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts to enforce civil and human rights". D-Ga.) As a co-sponsor, the BDS movement does not specifically mention, but is a clear antidote to the measure that has passed the house on Tuesday evening.

In private, some high-ranking Democrats had feared that the anti-BDS resolution would create a messy spit between moderates and progressives that had been publicized in recent weeks.

Leaders of the various interest groups in the Caucus issued a rare joint statement recognizing the dispute and promising to move forward. But privately, lawmakers feared that the anti-BDS resolution would ignite a powder keg on US policy toward Israel, which has been in cows for months.

In light of this, some lawmakers called for the House majority leader, Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), To bring the resolution to the floor after the August break, when hopes of tensions between the two ideological wings of the Caucus have cooled off.

The progressive leaders went one step further and actively urged the Democrats to cancel a proposed vote on the resolution. But the Democratic leaders opposed and sought instead a compromise that could satisfy both wings of the Caucus.

Progressives had demanded that the anti-BDS bill be combined with a much less controversial proposal that affirms that any US Middle East peace plan must "include and focus on a two-state solution."

Democrats are in talks to bring the two-state resolution – by Deputy Alan Lowenthal (D-Calif.) – to the table at the end of this week to give the House democrats the chance to settle for a policy easily in relation to Israel, which would not divide its own caucus.

Kyle Cheney contributed to this report.


Source link