قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / House holds Barr, Ross in criminal contempt, as GOP criticizes "more political theater"

House holds Barr, Ross in criminal contempt, as GOP criticizes "more political theater"

The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to hold criminal prosecution against Attorney General Bill Barr and Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, saying they would interfere with the Trump administration's efforts to add a citizenship question to the Census 2020. [19659002] The vote was part of a series of rapid developments that should shake the house. It took place less than an hour after the renewed attempt to sue President Trump. 137 Democrats voted with Republicans to initiate impeachment, which President Trump later called a "slaughter."

And on Tuesday, a chaotic and historic bottom battled against the Democrats' determination to present a united front and condemn Trumps. racist remarks over the weekend.

The vote to keep Barr and Ross in criminal disdain was 230-1

98, with 4 Democrats and all Republicans voting No. The Michigan MP Justin Amash, who after the Leaving the Republican Party is now independent, voted Yes.

Ross made a fiery statement immediately after the vote, accusing the House Democrats "never tried to have a productive relationship with the Trump administration." 19659003] WATCH: MAYHEM IN THE HOUSE WHEN PELOSI IS KEEPED FROM THE ORDER AND CHAIR SIMPLY GAVEL AND WAYS FALLS

"Today's PR stunt further shows that they are anxious to generate headlines instead in good faith With our department, "said Ross. To support political games rather than the leadership of the country, they have made every effort to attribute evil motives to everyday government functions.

  President Donald Trump is assisted by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Attorney General William Barr, right, as he speaks in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington on Thursday, July 11, 2019. (AP Photo / Carolyn Kaster)

President Donald Trump will be accompanied by Trade Secretary Wilbur Ross and Attorney General William Barr as he speaks in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington on Thursday, July 11, 2019. (AP Photo / Carolyn Kaster)

In a separate statement, Justice Ministry spokesman Kerri Kupec described the moment as "a new low for Spokesman Pelosi's House of Representatives."

"The Ministry of Justice has been working for months to deliver thousands of documents to meet Congressional demands," Kupec said. "In addition, many of the documents that are the subject of this vote have been categorized as privileged by a federal court … This vote is nothing more than a political stunt. "

However, in his own statement and his comments on the House Floor, Chairman of the Supervisory Committee, Elijah Cummings, described the move as overdue.

"Since the committee made bipartisan rulings on April 2, 2019, the ministries of justice and trade have refused to submit important unreduced documents," Cummings said. "The government initially claimed that it would not submit documents, while the Supreme Court was examining this case – an unfounded argument that was rejected by the committee. "


Cummings added, "Secretary Ross testified under oath that he added a citizenship question" only. "Support to the Justice Department in enforcing the Voting Rights Act. But we now know that asserting was nothing more than an excuse, "he said after a Supreme Court ruling. Meanwhile, Republicans proposed that Democrats were only concerned about the political consequences when they inquired about the citizenship of the individual's census.

The Democrats turned against the citizenship issue to discourage illegal immigrants from participating in the census and to reduce the number of populations that could impact on federal funding and representation of congresses in high-immigration areas, also determined by population censuses legally residing illegally in the country.

"Democrats are discussing another episode of political theater to delegitimize the citizenship issue," Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, the head of the Republicans in the House Oversight Committee said after the vote, "The abuse of the Democrats from their contempt authority today raises the question: "Why do not you want to know how many American citizens are in this country?"

It was highly unlikely that Barr and Ross would file charges, as they would have to be prosecuted by the Trump Department of Justice's Barr heads , When Holder was finally despised in 2012, his Justice Department under President Barack Obama did not pursue any charges.

In May, Barr joked with Pelosi on the usefulness of a resolution to contempt. According to a source close to the Attorney General, Barr approached Pelosi in a tent after the National Peace Officers Memorial Service and asked if she had brought her handcuffs.

Nonetheless, the debate over contempt during the day was controversial. In a spirited moment, Rep. Mark Meadows, RNC, Cummings & # 39; s own words from 2012 when republicans tried to despise then Attorney General Eric Holder about the gun operation sanctioned by Obama. Fast and Furious. "

" Keeping someone in contempt of Congress is one of the most serious and formal measures that our committee can take, "Meadows began." It should not be used as a political tool for generating press in a witch hunt in the election year , Well, who is responsible for this quote? It is not Jordan, it is not Cheney, it is chairman Elijah Cummings! "

For his part, Cummings, D-Md., Said that the resolution on criminal disdain" for the protection of democracy "and" the protection of democracy "It's bigger than the census," Cummings said, "I do not come lightly on this floor."

  Young demonstrators gather in the Supreme Court when the judges call the term important Ending Cheating Decisions and a Census Trump Administration Trying to Ask Everyone For Their Citizenship Status in the 2020 Census on Capitol Hill, Washington, Thursday, June 27, 2019. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite) [19659007] Young demonstrators gather in the Supreme Court as the judges terminate the tenure with major decisions on Gerrymandering and a census with the Trump administration's attempt to question everyone about their citizenship status at the 2020 Census on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 27, 2019. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)
<p>  Sparks also flew on Tuesday, when the house hosted a fierce ground combat, before finally passing a resolution condemning President Trump for giving "racist" comments. The spit saw House Speaker Nancy Pelosi shut down and briefly lose her right to speak, and the chairman left his post in frustration. </p>
<p>  "Oh, that's just more political theater," Ross said Wednesday morning to Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business Network. "It has no real material basis, we have submitted to the committee more than 14,000 pages of documents, about a dozen documents, about 15 pages, which the courts did not consider necessary to draw their conclusion." </p>
<p>  In In a letter to Pelosi, Barr and Ross proposed the House panel's decision "I recommend that the House exercise its law enforcement authority, despite the continued readiness of the privileged status of the documents in question and active litigation pending in the matter </p>
<p>  "We urge the House to postpone the vote on contempt to allow the continuation of the constitutional placement procedure," wrote Barr and Ross, "and we respectfully remind the committee Remember that the constitutionally required obligation </p>
<p>  The Democrats could have resolved the path of civil contempt, but that would have meant bringing the matter to court court. Barr and Ross could then file the defense that they would not have provided the requested material because President Trump had asserted the executive privilege over them. </p><div><script async src=


"We are not walling, but we are not giving in on the very, very important issue of executive privilege," Ross said Bartiromo. "These are privileged documents. They will remain privileged documents, and we will not be afraid to change this position just because the House could take action. "

House democrats have been trying to get records explaining why the administration has been trying to pick up the citizenship issue. Ross claimed that the Department of Justice had urged the enforcement of the Voting Rights Act, but the Supreme Court found this only as a pretext.

The Supreme Court ruling said that a citizenship question could theoretically be allowed, but there had to be a valid reason for that. Democrats have argued against the issue of citizenship, claiming it would discourage people from responding to the census, influencing the level of federal funds and drawing district maps in areas with large immigrant populations.

The Trump government seemed to be going back and forth on how to proceed after the Supreme Court ruling. First, Ross's sales department said they would continue to print the questionnaires for the census without the question, just so that President Trump would tweet he would not give up the fight to take him.

Finally, Trump announced that the administration would not include the citizenship issue in the census, but ordered the Commerce Department to compile citizenship information from various federal databases.

Regardless, the House voted to reject the government that surrounds Congress and sells weapons to Saudi Arabia. The move is likely to trigger another veto with the president.

"Today, Parliament has decided to reject the rash decision of the Trump administration to allow the sale of sensitive military equipment and ammunition to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which continue to pursue a war in Yemen whose main result is a war Unhubed humanitarian catastrophe and a military stalemate, "said House majority leader Steny Hoyer in a statement.

PELOSI VOWS TRUMP PUSH TO JOIN THE AOC KADER WHO DOES NOT WORK [19659002] "Forcibly putting pressure on the Iran-backed Houthi rebels, who committed terrible atrocities and are responsible for terrible civilian suffering, has demonstrably not accepted the demands of the coalition," Hoyer continued. I am encouraged by reports that the UAE is now rethinking its role in this conflict. we should do the same.

In addition, Parliament voted to effectively kill homicide articles by Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, which has long urged that Trump resign from Trump's statements this weekend, aimed at four progressive lawmakers , are disqualifying.

The vote on the filing of impeachment proceedings was successful from 332 to 1995. Each Republican voted in favor of filing the bill, and 137 Democrats joined them to an independent, yes yes, and Oregon Democrat Rep. Peter DeFazio Vote was present.

The vote was not a mere up-or-down vote on the Trump case, but a procedural move to lull Green's articles. [19659003] "I rejected this procedural motion because this article denied Dismissal to the House Judiciary Committee should have been referred, "said Jerry Nadler, DN.Y., the chairman this body, in a statement. "An impeachment resolution has already been referred to the committee, and Congressman Green's resolution was separate and unambiguous and did not directly address issues of disability, corruption, and abuse of power – but it also referred us

Nadler added, "I hope that here too future impeachment decisions will be expelled, so they will also be part of the committee's general response to unequivocal allegations of misconduct by the president."

Despite procedural concerns The vote officially marks the temperature of the Democratic Caucus on this matter for the first time since the publication of Special Adviser Robert Mueller's report, just days after the MPs. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., And Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Demanded Trump's removal from office at a fiery press conference.

Omar even alleged that there was "credible evidence" that Trump had illegally denied to Russians. despite Müller's findings to the contrary after a long investigation. In fact, Mueller found that Russian actors had made numerous attempts to involve the Trump team in their hacking efforts, but there was no evidence that the Trump team had ever teamed with them to hack disinformation campaigns on social media or participate in it.

Democrats, including Pelosi, have long warned that there is not enough factual justification for impeachment. And the topic is a hot topic for swing-state Democrats who risk being alienated from moderates.


The parliament previously voted to submit Green's impeachment article in December 2017 with 238-126 against 4 voting members.

In January 2018, the articles were filed with 234-121 against 3 voting Democrats.

Fox News & # 39; Ronn Blitzer and Chad Pergram contributed to this report.

Source link