قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / Hoyer says "for sure" when asked if Trump can deliver SOTU despite Pelosis' objections

Hoyer says "for sure" when asked if Trump can deliver SOTU despite Pelosis' objections



Steny Hoyer, chairman of the majority of the House, said on Tuesday, "Your World With Neil Cavuto" by Fox News, that he had no objection to President Trump's speech in the House of Representatives on 29 January has, despite the Speaker of Parliament Nancy Pelosis repeated threats, the traditional speech would be delayed.

Hoyer, D-Md., Also noted that on Thursday afternoon, the Senate was voting on Republican and Democratic proposals to end the current partial closure of the Federal Government, now in its 32nd edition. Both are Cloture voices, meaning that both take 60 years to pass.

"It is definitely a step forward to have votes, and it is my opinion … that one of the bills we have sent will reopen the government until February 1

.8 will be on the Ground, "said Hoyer, referring to the draft Democrats, which does not include funding for Trump's planned boundary wall. "I'm sure every Democrat will vote for this bill."

The GOP Bill follows Trump's proposal on Saturday, offering the Democrats a three-year extension of protection for 700,000 recipients of DACA receivers. in return for the $ 5.7 billion, he sought a barrier on the country's southern border with Mexico.

TRUMP CHALLENGE PELOSI: WHY NO KEY POINTS IF YOU ARE INFFECTIVE, ?

The agreement proposed by the White House would extend protection for 300,000 recipients of the TPS program by three years – protecting immigrants from certain countries with conditions that prevent the safe return of citizens.

But Hoyer, According to Democratic House No. 2, the Senate Republicans can not really count on just one Democrat backing this legislation, which means they will not get the 60-point threshold needed for transit. The Republicans have a narrow majority in the Senate from 53 to 47.

"I do not think he will pull the Democrats out," Hoyer said, adding that the shutdown was "dangerous," as reportedly an unprecedented number of Airport security officials at airports call out sick "They believe the government should be reopened, then there should be a negotiation."

Hoyer's comments came when Fox News reported that the White House is still planning to push ahead with the union's planned address next week. The details remain in the air after Pelosi urged the president to postpone the speech or she to be submitted in writing in the fight against the government's cessation.

Fox News has learned that the White House has sent a letter to the House Sergeant at Arms to plan a tour of next week's planned address. This happened after a previously scheduled tour had been canceled last week at Pelosis request.

  TSA employee Amelia Williams receives a bottle of milk in a food bank for a government employee hit by the closure, Tuesday, January 22, 2019, in the Brooklyn neighborhood of New York. (AP Photo / Mark Lennihan)

TSA employee Amelia Williams receives a bottle of milk for decommissioned government workers Tuesday, January 22, 2019, in the Brooklyn neighborhood of New York. (AP photo / Mark Lennihan)

According to several sources, it is unclear whether the address scheduled for January 29th will actually be forwarded or where it would be located.

The White House is even planning a speech outside of Washington.

Pelosi has identified security threats to the event as key federal agencies are unsecured, but a senior Homeland Security official told Fox News that the agency was ready and well prepared for the event. Republicans have accused Pelosi of playing politics with the address.

UNsecurity Surveillance STATE OF THE UNION: TRUMP COULD MAKE THE ADDRESS IN SENATE

"It's certainly a step forward to have votes."

– Major Major Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

Asked by host Neil Cavuto whether Trump can legally apply for an opposition from the Union state over Pelosis, Hoyer said he could not. Although Pelosi Trump did not formally refrain from the speech, she suggested that a speech was not a good idea and should only be given in writing.

"Within his rights – now this is a technical term and the answer to that is no," answered Hoyer. "The President comes here at the invitation of the Congress, and especially Parliament, to speak before the United States Congress."

Article II, Section 3 of the US Constitution also gives the President the capacity "on extraordinary occasions". one or both Congress Chambers convened. But this provision was not used since 1947 and 1948, when President Harry Truman examined this option twice, and "Convocation" does not necessarily mean Trump is allowed to speak.

  Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. He leaves the chamber after discussing his plan to implement a 1,300-page show worth $ 5.7 billion to finance the planned wall of President Donald Trump along the US-Mexico border. This is the crux of the dispute between Trump and Democrats A partial government shutdown at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, January 22, 2019. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)

Chairman of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky , leaves the chamber after discussing his plan A $ 1.3 billion spending $ 1,300 bill will fund President Donald Trump's planned wall along the US-Mexico border. This is the crucial point in the dispute between Trump and Democrats, which has led to a partial closure of the government's Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, January 22, 2019. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)

And when Truman used Article II, Section 3, to convene Congress, he did so when the Congress did not convene. Both Democrats and Republicans have vowed to keep the Congress in session until the closure is decided.

Otherwise, both Congress Chambers must be approved for a speech in plenary session of a resolution in order to use the Chamber of the House and have both bodies meet in one session. Joint session of the Congress. That has not happened yet. Should the Senate host the president instead, a resolution would be required.

But Hoyer apparently had no trouble in a break with Pelosi, allowing Trump to speak.

"Sure," answered Hoyer. to the question whether he would be open to Trump when he speaks personally in the House of the State of the Union. When asked if Pelosi would agree, he added, "I do not know what the discussions were."

And in another split with Pelosi, Hoyer humbled himself again when asked if walls really were "immoral."

Physical barriers are part of the solution, "Hoyer said," Look, if it protects people, it's moral, if it imprisons people, it can be immoral. "

On Thursday afternoon, the Senate will pass over to vote on the president 's compromise plan to end the government' s closure and in return to finance a border wall for various concessions linked to immigration, followed by a vote on a Democratic proposal

Reopening Feb. 8 Without Providing Wall Funding. On Monday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Argued that Trump's plan is the only realistic way to end the ongoing partial cutoff of the federal government now on the 32nd day The GOP Senate Act, which follows Trump's proposal, also includes additional funds for d he disaster recovery.

"The opportunity to end all this is to face us," McConnell said. "That's why we're going to vote on this Senate Hall this week. All that has to happen is that the Democrats agree that it's time to put the country before politics to take 'yes' as an answer and to vote for leaving this distancing behind. "US Senator Mitch McConnell's offices in Park Hills, Kentucky, Tuesday, January 22, 2019. (AP Photo / Bryan Woolston) “/>

The US US Senator Jeff Herrema holds a sign in front of US Senator Mitch McConnell's offices in Park Hills, Ky., Tuesday, January 22, 2019. (AP Photo / Bryan Woolston)

McConnell added, "To be clear, the President's proposal, which we are considering here in the Senate, is the only present proposal that can be signed by the President and immediately reopen the government."

But Hoyer told Cavuto that Trump "caused" these problems with DACA by trying to revoke it. "Now he says I'll solve it for you, it's not a negotiation … It's a stupid thing to have done this President."

The GOP Bill provides for means that will allow the Customs and the Border Patrol Authorities allow "considerable investment in improved surveillance technologies, as well as funds for the recruitment and training of 750 people." New Border Patrol Agents … and $ 5.7 billion for the construction of a physical barrier in the highest-priority areas of the US In his remarks, McConnell also pointed to Democrats who have publicly denounced House Speaker Nancy Peloso claiming a border wall was an "immorality."

"Is it really their plan, workers, DACA – receivers, customs and border patrols and actually throwing all Americans on the bus to expand this political theater theater? can they look like champions of the so-called "resistance"? "McConnell asked with regard to the leaders of the Democrats."

"Not surprisingly, considering that the speaker went completely out of control a few weeks ago and stated that physical border security was on his face "An immorality," he continued, "but not every democrat seems to see it that way. And how could they? A Democrat from Washington State admitted, quoting, "The wall is not a bad idea in itself … it was made." Another from Illinois claimed, "If we have a partial wall, if we have fencing, if we have." Technology that was used to protect our border is fine. "And one of the Californian delegation members said," We will support border security … all the elements including the fences. "

" You can not compromise when a page explains: "We want that, and you want that," said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y. In its own remarks.

On Sunday, Bennie Thompson, chairman of the Homeland Security Committee of the House, broke with some of his Democrats in Congress by saying in an interview with ABC News "This Week" that he "in certain cases "Although he warned that the White House needed a better" plan "than simply using a wall, it was" a point of conversation. "

Hoyer also appeared on Thompson's position last Wednesday in the Special Report from Fox News "with Bret Baier, who argues that boundary walls" obviously "work, and rejects the proposals to reduce barriers where they already exist Hoyer also said walls are not necessarily a matter of morality.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

. Democratic Californian MP Juan Vargas confirmed this in an interview with CNN earlier this month. These physical defenses were effective and increased security for local residents.

"I mean, you go to the border and see long queues of people waiting to come in … so we have a problem with huge queues coming in," Vargas anchor Don Lemon said. "You know, there is even fencing, to be honest, there are places where we already have fencing, where it made sense for security reasons. "

Fox News & # 39; Chad Pergram, Alex Pappas, John Roberts and Neil Cavuto contributed to this report.


Source link