MARK GARLICK / GETTY
Here's something to think about. Peter Hintz, a mathematician at the University of California at Berkeley, this year theorized that the universe contains a class of black holes that are not just the normal (or normal) laws of physics (space-time), but under Under the circumstances, a human being could enter without being pushed into a stream of material, but in a state of affairs that seems spooky. But that's a very strange haunting. It is one who has no past, but instead holds for the Lord how long he stands in futures that have no past (or are determined by any particular past). They only move in a cloud of potential (the virtual one of Delueze). You are a ghost of the coming jets. They do not relate to what you have been, but only what you can become. Its givenness is always a givenness unconnected with any objectified or unified (or, to use a Whitehead's term). What kind of spirit is that? Of course, those in our world are stuck like an insect in a glass cube in the past. Or an object that enters the eternal birth of the universe.
[G] Against the background of the past and present, the physical laws of the universe allow no more than one possible future … But says UC Berkeley, postdoc colleague Peter Hintz, show mathematical calculations, That this is the case for some When certain types of black holes expand in a universe like ours, which is spreading with increasing speed, it is possible to survive the transition from a deterministic world to a non-deterministic black hole.
In the mathematics of Hintz, this "benign black hole" can break with the so-called Strong Cosmic Censorship (SCC). This rule, which the physicist Roger Penrose imposed fifty years ago and was certainly in the spirit of the great thinker and spinster Albert Einstein (he hated black holes and ghosts), is basically a stop sign on the so-called Cauchy horizon. a horizon within the event horizon of a black hole and the point at which Einstein's universe collapses completely and the past is separated from the future (the Grundbesitz der Grundphysik from 1
It is believed that encountering the Cauchy horizon will be physically catastrophic. Nothing can survive such an experience, because black holes are nothing but bad news. First, "the tidal forces near the event horizon are enough to spaghetti anything: that is, to stretch it until it is a series of atoms." Second, you could never return to the normal universe and share the experience on Instragram. It is also believed that once a person is in this zone of the black hole, they will be overwhelmed by all the energy the black hole has recorded throughout the evolutionary process of the universe. It would not be there in stages (or as cosmic history), but at once (all the energy that has ever been). Hintz and others are now challenging SCC, which, according to Hintz, is based on a thinking that does not adequately reflect or misjudge the accelerating expansion of the universe.
With this different understanding, it is possible that the entire universe of history (as a whole) is not in a black hole. The universe is expanding faster and faster. The further away something is from us, the faster the room is expanded. Under the right conditions and with the right black hole, this could be an opening to the ghostly world that absorbs what has become of what might be.
Professor Hintz, in a post by Berkeley News :
No physicist will travel in a black hole and measure it. This is a mathematical question. But from this point of view, this makes Einstein's equations more mathematically interesting … This is a question that you can only study mathematically, but it has physical, almost philosophical implications, which makes it very cool.
The keywords here are "almost philosophical implications." Hintz knows the dangerous game he plays with this form of mathematical speculation very well, and points directly to another reason why Penrose has the Stop Sign (SCC) on Cauchy's horizon has placed.
One of the chief opponents of scientific thought was from the beginning (along with Galileo and others of his time) this bastard metaphysics (or speculative philosophy). Even philosophy (the love of all wisdom) adopted this (and largely conditioned by it) form of argumentation, the logical positivism that emerged in Vienna in the 1920s. The main reason is that since metaphysical sentences can not be verified, they are nothing but nonsense. Metaphysics, which attempts to grasp a comprehensive and fundamental picture of "the universe" in order to connect everything with everything (especially the best metaphysics that exists, Whitehead's philosophy of the organism), became quite dishonest. And we can see in Penrose's SCC an attempt to keep metaphysical speculations of all kinds out of this obviously messy region of scientific research. It is prone to it. It asks. It begs for it. Everyone can enter the area and think as freely and freely as they want. Poetry can even thrive here. And poetry is only worse than speculative philosophy.
But there is still something to be considered here, and it is related to the possibility of surviving a Cauchy horizon because the danger of the entire history of the energy of the universe has been reduced by the expansion of the universe: the fact that we are Seeing Light Left galaxies 13 billion light years ago – galaxies so close to the birth of this universe that they are still in the early stages of their formation (they are fuzzy masses of gravitational gas and dust) should make us wonder me: why now? Why can we see so much of the universe, watch it almost until the beginning of its inflation? Why are not we at a later date when the light of distant galaxies has been overwhelmed by the expansion of space, and therefore can never be reached and seen by a human instrument (organic or otherwise)? That's funny, no? We are aware of the universe at exactly the right time. There must be a connection.