قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / In the first story, the British government found a disregard for Parliament's UK News

In the first story, the British government found a disregard for Parliament's UK News



London, United Kingdom The British government will fully publish legal advice that it has received regarding the widely criticized Brexit transaction by Prime Minister Theresa May after it was determined that she was the parliament originally disregarded for failure.

In a groundbreaking vote on Tuesday, parliamentarians in the lower house of the House of Representatives supported a six-party petition the day before, in which they demanded full disclosure from the attorney by 311 against 293.

The vote marked for the first time in history that a British government was found defying Parliament.

In response to the result, the Chairman of the Conservative Party of the House of Commons Andrea Leadsom the government intended to publish the council on Wednesday.

"We have listened attentively and will publish the final and complete advice of the Attorney-General to the Cabinet, given the explicit will of the House," Lea dsom told Parliament.

The matter is also referred to the Commons Privilege to determine which ministers are responsible for the alleged disrespect and whether a subsequent penalty is required.

A previous attempt by the Ministers to reject the petition for requisition by referring the entire matter to the cross-party Privileges committee was defeated with four votes.

" Acute Constitutional Conflict Principle"

The sensation aroused on Tuesday after the government released a 52-page summary of the legal adviser on the May Brexit Plan on Monday.

A binding parliamentary vote last month called on ministers to publish all the advice they received on the planned EU resignation agreement.

In a speech to parliament on Monday, Attorney General Geoffrey Cox announced that he would publish the full amount of legal advice he would submit to the government on the deal, "violating the public interest". 1

9659005] "I have come in an acute conflict of the constitutional principle," said Cox.

"Suppose I had given advice … on all sorts of matters, including our relations with foreigners. Tes … including matters of acute importance to this country, it would be true that the Attorney General, regardless of the impairment I say that would not do it. "

May explained that the advice her government received about the Brexit deal was fully treated confidentially under the lawyer-client privilege should be.

The Shadow Brexit of opposition party secretary Sir Keir Starmer, meanwhile, called on the government to follow Tuesday's ruling, which he described as "of great constitutional and political significance."

"Strengthens Government Fragility"

Analysts It was unlikely that formal sanctions would be imposed on ministers on Tuesday of contempt for the bureau, instead it was used as a "primary political" instrument which should force the government to publish the full range of attorneys it receives.

"That [punishment of ministers] would only have happened if the government had continued to challenge Parliament for publishing legal advice," said Dominic Walsh, a political analyst at the impartial independent political think tank Op de Europe to Al Jazeera.

"But the political implications are significant … they reinforce how fragile the government is – the alliance with the DUP is almost dead," added Walsh, referring to the partners of May's Conservative Party in the government, the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP).

Nine out of ten DUP deputies voted in favor of the government's petition for a petition.

"Meaningful Voting & # 39;

Following the vote, May began five days of parliamentary debate over her planned resignation agreement with a statement to parliament.

A so-called "meaningful vote" on the proposed agreement is scheduled for December 11 in the lower house as soon as the ongoing discussions are completed.

A majority stake would mean that May can introduce a formal law on an EU withdrawal agreement to be submitted to Parliament in early 2019 for consideration and ratification.

However, the majority of the opposition would force their government to submit a new plan within 21 days. A vote by the House of Commons on Tuesday afternoon stated that parliamentarians would have the right to change such a motion.

Experts said Parliament's decision to give itself the authority to amend a second Brexit motion filed in May should it lose The vote on December 11 could force the government to make large concessions in their current position regarding the UK's withdrawal from the EU.

"To date, the option for the government seemed to be the one that had them a few weeks earlier when they had to face music for a second vote when they lost the first attempt on December 11," said Scott Lucas, professor of international politics at the British University of Birmingham, opposite Al Jazeera.

"But after today's developments, the government [instead] will have to form a new coalition of MPs, some of whom are skeptical of the current bill before Parliament, but may accept an amended version," Lucas added added.

Walsh suggested, however, that Parliament would seek to push Brexit into a "softer direction" should be defeated on Dec. 11 as Brexiteers make riskier decisions as this leads to the opposite outcome of the

"Paradoxically, today's events could actually reduce the scale of rebellion for the meaningful vote next week," he added.

May's proposed deal has been flatly criticized across the UK's political spectrum, including his own, and will be rejected by a majority of parliamentarians next Tuesday.


Source link