قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Italy / Does the "blow" on the house with the "outlaw" to

Does the "blow" on the house with the "outlaw" to



The maneuver that comes soon has the taste of an asset. The house actually returned to the seeker, and the government intends to use it as an ATM. The union of Imu and Tasi could actually revive the buildings. And to highlight this risk is Confedilizia, which uses no exchanges and without hesitation rejects the Giallorossi maneuver. The President of Confedilizia Spanzani Testa used strong words to describe the next budget law that started his parliamentary process. In fact, number one Confedilizia points to the new tax that could result from the merger of IMU and Tasi: "Negative judgment on the union of the two taxes Imu and Tasi, which was not necessary because it does not solve them at all These are the problems of Imu and Tasi, which are related to a fortune of 22 billion a year, which continues to burden so many properties that have no income opportunities and that should definitely be reduced.We hope the changes will help Improvements may come and in particular confirmation for at least a year of flatrate on stores and a change of Imu-Tasi, which is not just the union of the name. "

And on this front a fairly detailed analysis of the content of the maneuver. "There are no reasons to justify raising the base price for the main residence from 4 to 5 × 1

000 and for the other buildings from 7.6 to 8.6 × 1000." And "there is no justification for the fact that about 300 municipalities, including Rome and Milan, receive a higher maximum rate than all other municipalities: 11.4 × 1000 instead of 10.6". added Spanzani Testa. But on this point Confedilizia takes a step forward and raises interest rates. Indeed, according to Confedilizia, the maximum limit of 11.4 per thousand set by the government for 300 municipalities could be suspected of being unconstitutional compared to the 10.6 per thousand limit set for all other cities. But beware: The Imu-Tari fusion has another aspect that should not be underestimated. As Confedelizia informs the Adnkronos, the new rules also suppress the obligation of each municipality to use a regulation to indicate all costs and services relating to the coverage of the same tax. In addition, the new tax is fully assigned to the owners. In short, the maneuver that will "take off" in Parliament is likely to be a kind of boulder for homeowners who have long been dealing with a tax that the house is almost considered a luxury.


Source link